A crucial legal proceeding has been slated in the pending case involving the handling of confidential material by ex-President Donald Trump, a pivotal development being closely watched. March 14 is when Judge Aileen Cannon intends to evaluate a 'motion to dismiss' the case, a lengthy session where the lawyers on both sides of the aisle will present their respective arguments in detail.

The lawsuit's fate may well rest on this hearing. If the judge sides with the defense, it could signify the end of the trial concerning the classified documents. Lawyers representing Mr. Trump are advocating for the case's dismissal, asserting the principle of presidential immunity.

The defense bases its argument on the U.S. Constitution. They reference the Impeachment Judgment Clause to argue that a president cannot be subjected to criminal prosecution unless he is first impeached and convicted by the Senate. This principle, they maintain, justifies immunity from legal charges relating to his presidential tenure.

They further argue that the Presidential Records Act gives the president indomitable authority to define certain records as personal. This, in their view, confirms that Trump had a legal right to possession of the disputed documents. Yet, contrary opinions are being voiced by Special Prosecutor Jack Smith's team.

A crucial legal proceeding has been slated in the pending case involving the handling of confidential material by ex-President Donald Trump, a pivotal development being closely watched. March 14 is when Judge Aileen Cannon intends to evaluate a 'motion to dismiss' the case, a lengthy session where the lawyers on both sides of the aisle will present their respective arguments in detail.
The lawsuit's fate may well rest on this hearing. If the judge sides with the defense, it could signify the end of the trial concerning the classified documents. Lawyers representing Mr. Trump are advocating for the case's dismissal, asserting the principle of presidential immunity.
The defense bases its argument on the U.S. Constitution. They reference the Impeachment Judgment Clause to argue that a president cannot be subjected to criminal prosecution unless he is first impeached and convicted by the Senate. This principle, they maintain, justifies immunity from legal charges relating to his presidential tenure.
They further argue that the Presidential Records Act gives the president indomitable authority to define certain records as personal. This, in their view, confirms that Trump had a legal right to possession of the disputed documents. Yet, contrary opinions are being voiced by Special Prosecutor Jack Smith's team.

Subscribe to Our Show for Real News, All Day Every Day

Subscribe to Our Show for Real News, All Day Every Day

Real News Now Podcast

Real News Now Podcast is a Podcast bringing you the Real News All Day Every Day!

<a href="https://realnewsnow.com/">Real News Now</a> Podcast is a Podcast bringing you the Real News All Day Every Day!

Advertisement