Ohio House Judiciary Committee leader Jim Jordan has declared that the GOP is actively constructing a case in opposition to Anthony Fauci, who was previously in charge of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

This came to light during a conversation with notable conservative broadcaster Benny Johnson. The contention revolves around Fauci's previous assertions that he had no knowledge concerning the funding of gain-of-function research that has raised eyebrows among some conservatives.

Johnson pointedly remarked in the course of the dialogue that it is unequivocally evident that Fauci was not truthful in his statements. He then brought up the existence of the 18 U.S. Code 1001, a rule stating that presenting dishonest statements to Congress carries the potential of incarceration for the responsible individual.

His conversation with Jordan explored the potential strategies that could be employed in this matter. However, any official recommendation would have to be fed through the current administration's justice department, a fact that Jordan expressed concerns about. He expressed doubts about the chances of action from the Senate Judiciary Committee with the current party makeup.

Jordan did imply a potential committee referral may be feasible. He also mentioned his preference would be for bringing Dr. Fauci back for an additional round of questioning. He gave a nod to previous testimonies, including the one given by Dr. Redfield and Chairman Wenstrup, as building blocks in this case.

Ohio House Judiciary Committee leader Jim Jordan has declared that the GOP is actively constructing a case in opposition to Anthony Fauci, who was previously in charge of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.
This came to light during a conversation with notable conservative broadcaster Benny Johnson. The contention revolves around Fauci's previous assertions that he had no knowledge concerning the funding of gain-of-function research that has raised eyebrows among some conservatives.
Johnson pointedly remarked in the course of the dialogue that it is unequivocally evident that Fauci was not truthful in his statements. He then brought up the existence of the 18 U.S. Code 1001, a rule stating that presenting dishonest statements to Congress carries the potential of incarceration for the responsible individual.
His conversation with Jordan explored the potential strategies that could be employed in this matter. However, any official recommendation would have to be fed through the current administration's justice department, a fact that Jordan expressed concerns about. He expressed doubts about the chances of action from the Senate Judiciary Committee with the current party makeup.
Jordan did imply a potential committee referral may be feasible. He also mentioned his preference would be for bringing Dr. Fauci back for an additional round of questioning. He gave a nod to previous testimonies, including the one given by Dr. Redfield and Chairman Wenstrup, as building blocks in this case.

Subscribe to Our Show for Real News, All Day Every Day

Subscribe to Our Show for Real News, All Day Every Day

Real News Now Podcast

Real News Now Podcast is a Podcast bringing you the Real News All Day Every Day!

<a href="https://realnewsnow.com/">Real News Now</a> Podcast is a Podcast bringing you the Real News All Day Every Day!

Advertisement