A ruling issued by a federal judge has rejected a legal challenge against a piece of statute in the capital city, Washington, D.C., that gives the right to non-citizens in the area to participate in local elections. The lawsuit fell through due to the inability of the seven involved plaintiffs to prove substantial detriment due to the operative law. The magistrate responsible for the decision, Amy Berman Jackson, was originally appointed by former President Obama.

The aggrieved parties of this legal showdown are all U.S. citizens who had their voter registrations in D.C. The law under scrutiny is known as the 'Local Resident Voting Rights Amendment Act of 2022.' The litigants voiced disapproval over this law, citing an alleged violation of their rights as enshrined in the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. constitution. This novel statute came to be part of the D.C. laws after the city's Council passed it in 2022.

The innovative aspect of this legislation was that it abolished the pre-existing mandate of citizenship as a necessity for involvement in local municipal elections. Exclusive to the domain of local ballots, the law endows noncitizen residents of the country's capital with the ability to cast their vote, leaving out federal-level voting entirely. This is clearly observed in the documents pertaining to the law.

This law assures the right to vote in a range of matters, from the selection of local leadership figures to the decision-making processes related to local initiatives, referenda, recalls, or changes to the city's charter. It's worth noting that the reach of the law is not confined merely to voting rights. It also allows non-national residents to contest for different roles within the D.C. government and to contribute as members of the city's Board of Elections, as illustrated in the judicial documents.

A ruling issued by a federal judge has rejected a legal challenge against a piece of statute in the capital city, Washington, D.C., that gives the right to non-citizens in the area to participate in local elections. The lawsuit fell through due to the inability of the seven involved plaintiffs to prove substantial detriment due to the operative law. The magistrate responsible for the decision, Amy Berman Jackson, was originally appointed by former President Obama.
The aggrieved parties of this legal showdown are all U.S. citizens who had their voter registrations in D.C. The law under scrutiny is known as the 'Local Resident Voting Rights Amendment Act of 2022.' The litigants voiced disapproval over this law, citing an alleged violation of their rights as enshrined in the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. constitution. This novel statute came to be part of the D.C. laws after the city's Council passed it in 2022.
The innovative aspect of this legislation was that it abolished the pre-existing mandate of citizenship as a necessity for involvement in local municipal elections. Exclusive to the domain of local ballots, the law endows noncitizen residents of the country's capital with the ability to cast their vote, leaving out federal-level voting entirely. This is clearly observed in the documents pertaining to the law.
This law assures the right to vote in a range of matters, from the selection of local leadership figures to the decision-making processes related to local initiatives, referenda, recalls, or changes to the city's charter. It's worth noting that the reach of the law is not confined merely to voting rights. It also allows non-national residents to contest for different roles within the D.C. government and to contribute as members of the city's Board of Elections, as illustrated in the judicial documents.

Subscribe to Our Show for Real News, All Day Every Day

Subscribe to Our Show for Real News, All Day Every Day

Real News Now Podcast

Real News Now Podcast is a Podcast bringing you the Real News All Day Every Day!

<a href="https://realnewsnow.com/">Real News Now</a> Podcast is a Podcast bringing you the Real News All Day Every Day!

Advertisement