Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg recently claimed that the scientific community had asked his platform to censor COVID-19 posts that turned out to be debatable or true. During an episode of the Lex Fridman Podcast, Zuckerberg spoke about the difficulties of enforcing policies on misinformation. He said that it can be challenging to determine whether content is false or simply wrong but not harmful. He used COVID-19 earlier in the pandemic as an example of real health implications where the scientific assumptions hadn't been fully vetted. He noted that the establishment encouraged him to enforce these shaky facts, which turned out to be more debatable than true.

Zuckerberg stated that many requests made by the scientific community hurt their credibility with the public. According to him, it had undermined trust significantly. Fridman prompted Zuckerberg's response by bringing to light his concern that content moderation could lead to the loss of information's nuance and depth found on the internet and AI systems. Zuckerberg has been accused of colluding with former NIAID director Dr. Anthony Fauci to cover up Facebook posts alleging that COVID-19 originated in a Wuhan lab. However, when he was initially accused of such allegations, Zuckerberg stated harmful misinformation would be taken down by Facebook.

He admitted that their system was not perfect in catching everything. However, he mentioned their mistake detection was the best number in terms of what they had seen and detected through their systems. Last year, several state Attorneys General accused Zuckerberg of coordinating with Dr. Fauci to suppress the theory that the COVID-19 virus may have originated in a Wuhan lab. Earlier this year, the US Department of Energy concluded that the virus probably leaked from the Wuhan lab in China.

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg recently claimed that the scientific community had asked his platform to censor COVID-19 posts that turned out to be debatable or true. During an episode of the Lex Fridman Podcast, Zuckerberg spoke about the difficulties of enforcing policies on misinformation. He said that it can be challenging to determine whether content is false or simply wrong but not harmful. He used COVID-19 earlier in the pandemic as an example of real health implications where the scientific assumptions hadn't been fully vetted. He noted that the establishment encouraged him to enforce these shaky facts, which turned out to be more debatable than true.
Zuckerberg stated that many requests made by the scientific community hurt their credibility with the public. According to him, it had undermined trust significantly. Fridman prompted Zuckerberg's response by bringing to light his concern that content moderation could lead to the loss of information's nuance and depth found on the internet and AI systems. Zuckerberg has been accused of colluding with former NIAID director Dr. Anthony Fauci to cover up Facebook posts alleging that COVID-19 originated in a Wuhan lab. However, when he was initially accused of such allegations, Zuckerberg stated harmful misinformation would be taken down by Facebook.
He admitted that their system was not perfect in catching everything. However, he mentioned their mistake detection was the best number in terms of what they had seen and detected through their systems. Last year, several state Attorneys General accused Zuckerberg of coordinating with Dr. Fauci to suppress the theory that the COVID-19 virus may have originated in a Wuhan lab. Earlier this year, the US Department of Energy concluded that the virus probably leaked from the Wuhan lab in China.

Subscribe to Our Show for Real News, All Day Every Day

Subscribe to Our Show for Real News, All Day Every Day

Real News Now Podcast

Real News Now Podcast is a Podcast bringing you the Real News All Day Every Day!

<a href="https://realnewsnow.com/">Real News Now</a> Podcast is a Podcast bringing you the Real News All Day Every Day!

Advertisement