Democratic Representatives sought to bar President Joe Biden's Democrat primary competitor, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., from delivering public statements during a hearing dedicated to scrutinizing governmental censorship.

Kennedy was among the witnesses who presented their views on the perceived collaboration between the Federal Government and Big Tech companies to suppress free speech to the House Judiciary Select Subcommittee on Corruptions within diverse Federal Government sectors.

Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, a Democrat from Florida, raised an objection based on House Rule 11, Clause 2, claiming a violation attributed to Mr. Kennedy.

She proposed to transition into a closed-door session because she believed Mr. Kennedy had publicly espoused prejudiced comments against Jews and Asians in the week leading up to the session.

House Rule 11, Clause 2 outlines the necessity of a private session when a House witness is expected to share testimony that might 'defame, degrade, or incriminate any person.' In such a scenario, it's deemed appropriate for the testimony to be held away from the public eye.

Democratic Representatives sought to bar President Joe Biden's Democrat primary competitor, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., from delivering public statements during a hearing dedicated to scrutinizing governmental censorship.
Kennedy was among the witnesses who presented their views on the perceived collaboration between the Federal Government and Big Tech companies to suppress free speech to the House Judiciary Select Subcommittee on Corruptions within diverse Federal Government sectors.
Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, a Democrat from Florida, raised an objection based on House Rule 11, Clause 2, claiming a violation attributed to Mr. Kennedy.
She proposed to transition into a closed-door session because she believed Mr. Kennedy had publicly espoused prejudiced comments against Jews and Asians in the week leading up to the session.
House Rule 11, Clause 2 outlines the necessity of a private session when a House witness is expected to share testimony that might 'defame, degrade, or incriminate any person.' In such a scenario, it's deemed appropriate for the testimony to be held away from the public eye.

Subscribe to Our Show for Real News, All Day Every Day

Subscribe to Our Show for Real News, All Day Every Day

Real News Now Podcast

Real News Now Podcast is a Podcast bringing you the Real News All Day Every Day!

<a href="https://realnewsnow.com/">Real News Now</a> Podcast is a Podcast bringing you the Real News All Day Every Day!

Advertisement