The judiciary has resolved that Ivanka Trump has a civic obligation to present her testimony in an ongoing trial relating to alleged civil fraud in New York concerning her father.

Despite attempts by Ivanka Trump's legal representatives to quash a subpoena demanding her statement, presiding Judge Arthur Engoron rejected the motion. He further clarified that her testimony would not be arranged prior to Wednesday, allowing for the possibility of an appeal to be lodged.

The appeal was indeed submitted following a decision by the appeals court to relieve Ivanka Trump of her defendant status. Arguing against the necessity of her court appearance, her defense contended, according to CNN, that she no longer needed to be subjected to the court proceedings.

Judge Engoron counter-argued, maintaining that Ivanka Trump was expected to furnish proof in the form of an affidavit to demonstrate that she no longer maintains domicile or employment in the state. The reason behind this being that only she can provide such confirmation and it was considered untimely to do so after the fact.

The court's disposition took a definitive stance when Judge Engoron declined to acknowledge a deposition from Ivanka Trump that had been recorded in Florida. This judgment was handed down after the first ruling was issued. 'We want her here in person,' he stated, emphasizing his preference for in-person testimonies.

Countering this, the legal team representing Ivanka Trump accused New York Attorney General Letitia James of seeking to capitalize on the media attention surrounding this case. The defense contended that the court held no jurisdiction concerning Ivanka Trump, as she has not been a resident or employed in New York since 2017.

The judiciary has resolved that Ivanka Trump has a civic obligation to present her testimony in an ongoing trial relating to alleged civil fraud in New York concerning her father.
Despite attempts by Ivanka Trump's legal representatives to quash a subpoena demanding her statement, presiding Judge Arthur Engoron rejected the motion. He further clarified that her testimony would not be arranged prior to Wednesday, allowing for the possibility of an appeal to be lodged.
The appeal was indeed submitted following a decision by the appeals court to relieve Ivanka Trump of her defendant status. Arguing against the necessity of her court appearance, her defense contended, according to CNN, that she no longer needed to be subjected to the court proceedings.
Judge Engoron counter-argued, maintaining that Ivanka Trump was expected to furnish proof in the form of an affidavit to demonstrate that she no longer maintains domicile or employment in the state. The reason behind this being that only she can provide such confirmation and it was considered untimely to do so after the fact.
The court's disposition took a definitive stance when Judge Engoron declined to acknowledge a deposition from Ivanka Trump that had been recorded in Florida. This judgment was handed down after the first ruling was issued. 'We want her here in person,' he stated, emphasizing his preference for in-person testimonies.
Countering this, the legal team representing Ivanka Trump accused New York Attorney General Letitia James of seeking to capitalize on the media attention surrounding this case. The defense contended that the court held no jurisdiction concerning Ivanka Trump, as she has not been a resident or employed in New York since 2017.

Subscribe to Our Show for Real News, All Day Every Day

Subscribe to Our Show for Real News, All Day Every Day

Real News Now Podcast

Real News Now Podcast is a Podcast bringing you the Real News All Day Every Day!

<a href="https://realnewsnow.com/">Real News Now</a> Podcast is a Podcast bringing you the Real News All Day Every Day!

Advertisement