The wheels of justice moved on Monday, as an appeals court in New York decided that the bond presumed nominee Donald Trump must post to safeguard his assets amid a civil fraud case could be considerably less than originally stated. The court, arbitrating the case brought forward by New York Attorney General And Honorable Letitia James, declared that a bond of $175 million, as opposed to the prior stipulation of $454 million, would suffice.

This ruling caused ripples as it was originally the decision of Judge Arthur Engoron who dealt the proverbial blow of $454 million. Trump's legal team had argued that expecting to find a surety company willing to back such an exorbitant bond was akin to finding a needle in a haystack. The impending deadline to obtain the original bond was closing in rapidly before the panel of five judges extended the timeframe by an additional ten days, granting Trump the opportunity to secure the downsized bond.

This unforeseen turn of events serves as a setback for Attorney General James. She had been gearing up to place a freeze on Trump's bank accounts and confiscate a portion of his real estate holdings in the wake of his legal challenge. The DC Enquirer, previously reported about James' initial steps to claim Trump's assets as the struggle to find an underwriter for the substantial $454 million bond unfolded.

In the light of these developments, Trump's legal team had admitted to a painstaking search that led them to meet with a multitude of surety companies. Despite their tenacious efforts and extensive interactions with these firms, they were unable to secure the necessary funding or find a willing underwriter for the initial bond size.

The wheels of justice moved on Monday, as an appeals court in New York decided that the bond presumed nominee Donald Trump must post to safeguard his assets amid a civil fraud case could be considerably less than originally stated. The court, arbitrating the case brought forward by New York Attorney General And Honorable Letitia James, declared that a bond of $175 million, as opposed to the prior stipulation of $454 million, would suffice.
This ruling caused ripples as it was originally the decision of Judge Arthur Engoron who dealt the proverbial blow of $454 million. Trump's legal team had argued that expecting to find a surety company willing to back such an exorbitant bond was akin to finding a needle in a haystack. The impending deadline to obtain the original bond was closing in rapidly before the panel of five judges extended the timeframe by an additional ten days, granting Trump the opportunity to secure the downsized bond.
This unforeseen turn of events serves as a setback for Attorney General James. She had been gearing up to place a freeze on Trump's bank accounts and confiscate a portion of his real estate holdings in the wake of his legal challenge. The DC Enquirer, previously reported about James' initial steps to claim Trump's assets as the struggle to find an underwriter for the substantial $454 million bond unfolded.
In the light of these developments, Trump's legal team had admitted to a painstaking search that led them to meet with a multitude of surety companies. Despite their tenacious efforts and extensive interactions with these firms, they were unable to secure the necessary funding or find a willing underwriter for the initial bond size.

Subscribe to Our Show for Real News, All Day Every Day

Subscribe to Our Show for Real News, All Day Every Day

Real News Now Podcast

Real News Now Podcast is a Podcast bringing you the Real News All Day Every Day!

<a href="https://realnewsnow.com/">Real News Now</a> Podcast is a Podcast bringing you the Real News All Day Every Day!

Advertisement