In a recent turn of events, Head of the Judiciary Committee, Jim Jordan (a respected Republican from Ohio), took a strong stand against what he identified as politically inclined prosecutions or 'lawfare' initiated by liberal prosecutors and Jack Smith, a special counsel appointed by the Biden Justice Department. He affirmed that he will formulate a strategy to counter these tactics, seemingly aimed at presumptive Republican frontrunner, Donald Trump.

In Jordan's perspective, there has been a systematically designed attempt by certain prosecutors to manipulate professional conduct rules and their obligations towards delivering justice for the sake of political ambitions. He asserts that these unfair mechanisms are employed as a tool to target opposition parties.

Jordan has proposed a radical but necessary action to address these biased prosecutions. He strongly urges the Appropriations Committee to eliminate federal funding for any state prosecutor or attorney general who is partaking in these lawfare tactics. He went further to suggest that funding should also be discontinued for federal prosecutors who exhibit such biased behavior.

The Judiciary Committee has already made strides by approving key legislation aimed at curbing these political prosecutions. Of particular note are H.R. 2553, named the 'No More Political Prosecutions Act', and H.R. 2595, also known as 'The Forfeiture Funds Expenditure Transparency Act.' These acts underscore the committee's commitment to fairness and transparency in legal procedures and it is hoped that the Appropriations Committee takes them into consideration.

In a recent turn of events, Head of the Judiciary Committee, Jim Jordan (a respected Republican from Ohio), took a strong stand against what he identified as politically inclined prosecutions or 'lawfare' initiated by liberal prosecutors and Jack Smith, a special counsel appointed by the Biden Justice Department. He affirmed that he will formulate a strategy to counter these tactics, seemingly aimed at presumptive Republican frontrunner, Donald Trump.
In Jordan's perspective, there has been a systematically designed attempt by certain prosecutors to manipulate professional conduct rules and their obligations towards delivering justice for the sake of political ambitions. He asserts that these unfair mechanisms are employed as a tool to target opposition parties.
Jordan has proposed a radical but necessary action to address these biased prosecutions. He strongly urges the Appropriations Committee to eliminate federal funding for any state prosecutor or attorney general who is partaking in these lawfare tactics. He went further to suggest that funding should also be discontinued for federal prosecutors who exhibit such biased behavior.
The Judiciary Committee has already made strides by approving key legislation aimed at curbing these political prosecutions. Of particular note are H.R. 2553, named the 'No More Political Prosecutions Act', and H.R. 2595, also known as 'The Forfeiture Funds Expenditure Transparency Act.' These acts underscore the committee's commitment to fairness and transparency in legal procedures and it is hoped that the Appropriations Committee takes them into consideration.

Subscribe to Our Show for Real News, All Day Every Day

Subscribe to Our Show for Real News, All Day Every Day

Real News Now Podcast

Real News Now Podcast is a Podcast bringing you the Real News All Day Every Day!

<a href="https://realnewsnow.com/">Real News Now</a> Podcast is a Podcast bringing you the Real News All Day Every Day!

Advertisement