Michael Cohen, formerly a trusted lawyer to President Donald Trump but now known for his proven history of deception, may have unwittingly given a significant boost to Trump's legal stance. Cohen’s recent courtroom comments could pose a challenge to the case being built against the 45th President by District Attorney Alvin Bragg. This interpretation emerged after detailed analysis on an undisclosed platform, following Cohen’s statements in the 'hush money’ case on Monday.

In his testimony, Cohen revealed that he had clandestinely taped conversations with Trump discussing a proposed payment to David Pecker, who was then the publisher of the National Enquirer. This occurred prior to the electoral race of 2016. According to Cohen, Pecker had offered $150,000 to Karen McDougal, a former Playboy model, in exchange for her story about alleged romantic involvement with Trump, and her subsequent silence in the lead-up to the election.

Cohen plays a significant role in another high-profile legal case, relating to alleged hush-money payments meant to silence adult film star Stormy Daniels. Daniels has claimed to have had a dalliance with Trump in 2006 during a celebrity golf tournament. The prosecution's narrative suggests that these payments were strategized moves by Trump to prevent any damaging information from affecting his 2016 presidential campaign.

However, Cohen's recent deposition points towards a different interpretation. It suggests that the possible ramifications of these allegations were of no great concern to Trump during his campaign. Cohen has insinuated that Trump was indifferent to the potentially damaging reputation effects of the stories, emphasizing that the President dismissed them as inconsequential to his election victory.

Michael Cohen, formerly a trusted lawyer to President Donald Trump but now known for his proven history of deception, may have unwittingly given a significant boost to Trump's legal stance. Cohen’s recent courtroom comments could pose a challenge to the case being built against the 45th President by District Attorney Alvin Bragg. This interpretation emerged after detailed analysis on an undisclosed platform, following Cohen’s statements in the 'hush money’ case on Monday.
In his testimony, Cohen revealed that he had clandestinely taped conversations with Trump discussing a proposed payment to David Pecker, who was then the publisher of the National Enquirer. This occurred prior to the electoral race of 2016. According to Cohen, Pecker had offered $150,000 to Karen McDougal, a former Playboy model, in exchange for her story about alleged romantic involvement with Trump, and her subsequent silence in the lead-up to the election.
Cohen plays a significant role in another high-profile legal case, relating to alleged hush-money payments meant to silence adult film star Stormy Daniels. Daniels has claimed to have had a dalliance with Trump in 2006 during a celebrity golf tournament. The prosecution's narrative suggests that these payments were strategized moves by Trump to prevent any damaging information from affecting his 2016 presidential campaign.
However, Cohen's recent deposition points towards a different interpretation. It suggests that the possible ramifications of these allegations were of no great concern to Trump during his campaign. Cohen has insinuated that Trump was indifferent to the potentially damaging reputation effects of the stories, emphasizing that the President dismissed them as inconsequential to his election victory.

Subscribe to Our Show for Real News, All Day Every Day

Subscribe to Our Show for Real News, All Day Every Day

Real News Now Podcast

Real News Now Podcast is a Podcast bringing you the Real News All Day Every Day!

<a href="https://realnewsnow.com/">Real News Now</a> Podcast is a Podcast bringing you the Real News All Day Every Day!

Advertisement