In a recent ruling, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit criticized the Biden administration for potentially violating the principles of the First Amendment. The appeals court panel, comprised of two George W.

Bush nominees and one Trump nominee, asserted that the President, along with the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the FBI, and the surgeon general, cannot exert pressure on social media platforms to remove content they find controversial.

Although the court upheld the ruling, it discarded certain language used by a Louisiana judge who had previously stated that the government should refrain from contacting social media platforms to request content removal. Consequently, the administration now has 10 days to seek a Supreme Court review of the ruling.

This ruling originates from a lawsuit brought by Missouri and Louisiana, conservative website owners, and four individuals who object to the administration's COVID-19 policy. The plaintiffs accused the Biden administration of using antitrust lawsuits and potential changes to federal law, which protect social media platforms' liability, as leverage against platforms like X and Facebook.

The Fifth Circuit ruling argued that the administration exerted undue influence on the platforms, employing tactics such as intimidating messages and threats of consequences to steer their moderation decisions.

By doing so, the court opined, the administration violated the First Amendment. This decision has been celebrated as a victory for free speech and against censorship by Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry.

In a recent ruling, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit criticized the Biden administration for potentially violating the principles of the First Amendment. The appeals court panel, comprised of two George W.
Bush nominees and one Trump nominee, asserted that the President, along with the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the FBI, and the surgeon general, cannot exert pressure on social media platforms to remove content they find controversial.
Although the court upheld the ruling, it discarded certain language used by a Louisiana judge who had previously stated that the government should refrain from contacting social media platforms to request content removal. Consequently, the administration now has 10 days to seek a Supreme Court review of the ruling.
This ruling originates from a lawsuit brought by Missouri and Louisiana, conservative website owners, and four individuals who object to the administration's COVID-19 policy. The plaintiffs accused the Biden administration of using antitrust lawsuits and potential changes to federal law, which protect social media platforms' liability, as leverage against platforms like X and Facebook.
The Fifth Circuit ruling argued that the administration exerted undue influence on the platforms, employing tactics such as intimidating messages and threats of consequences to steer their moderation decisions.
By doing so, the court opined, the administration violated the First Amendment. This decision has been celebrated as a victory for free speech and against censorship by Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry.

Subscribe to Our Show for Real News, All Day Every Day

Subscribe to Our Show for Real News, All Day Every Day

Real News Now Podcast

Real News Now Podcast is a Podcast bringing you the Real News All Day Every Day!

<a href="https://realnewsnow.com/">Real News Now</a> Podcast is a Podcast bringing you the Real News All Day Every Day!