Christian Nationalism: Is It Connected to Postmillennial Christianity?

As mentioned the previous several weeks, there’s an unseemly battle royale taking place among Christian conservatives this year. Some of the fight is over semantics, some is over vision for the future, and some of it (sadly) is due to personality conflict.

The panel is spending six episodes attempting to directly expose the issues involved, hoping to forthrightly frame the various dialogs within a biblical context. This is a VERY complex issue that touches upon how to understand what’s called Theonomy (in distinction from Theocracy and Sacralism), how understand prophecy (primarily in relation to Postmillennialism, Amillennialism, and Preterism), and how to understand the moniker “Christian Nationalism” (as distinct from Christianity proper, Christendom, and even Sharia Law).

That’s a lot to cover. This is episode 4 of 6. The full discussion of six shows is available as one long video on the Rumble channel for Household of Faith in Christ. https://rumble.com/v2kr5kc-video-gg-theonomy-and-christian-nationalism.html

The panel:

Troy Skinner.  Pastor of Household of Faith in Christ.  www.HouseholdOfFaithInChrist.com

Daniel Razvi.  Pastor of The Church That Meets at Imran’s House.

Elijah Dirksen.  Seminary student pursuing an MDiv degree from Whitfield Theological Seminary.

Christian Nationalism: Is It Connected to Postmillennial Christianity?
As mentioned the previous several weeks, there’s an unseemly battle royale taking place among Christian conservatives this year. Some of the fight is over semantics, some is over vision for the future, and some of it (sadly) is due to personality conflict.
The panel is spending six episodes attempting to directly expose the issues involved, hoping to forthrightly frame the various dialogs within a biblical context. This is a VERY complex issue that touches upon how to understand what’s called Theonomy (in distinction from Theocracy and Sacralism), how understand prophecy (primarily in relation to Postmillennialism, Amillennialism, and Preterism), and how to understand the moniker “Christian Nationalism” (as distinct from Christianity proper, Christendom, and even Sharia Law).
That’s a lot to cover. This is episode 4 of 6. The full discussion of six shows is available as one long video on the Rumble channel for Household of Faith in Christ. <a href="https://rumble.com/v2kr5kc-video-gg-theonomy-and-christian-nationalism.html">https://rumble.com/v2kr5kc-video-gg-theonomy-and-christian-nationalism.html</a>
The panel:
Troy Skinner.  Pastor of Household of Faith in Christ.  www.HouseholdOfFaithInChrist.com
Daniel Razvi.  Pastor of The Church That Meets at Imran’s House.
Elijah Dirksen.  Seminary student pursuing an MDiv degree from Whitfield Theological Seminary.

The Frederick Faith Debate is designed to be an open an honest forum for local faith community leaders to share and discuss their views of the truth.  Lady Bird Johnson once said, “the clash of ideas is the sound of freedom”.  In that spirit, the show seriously wrestles with important ideas… the participant often disagreeing with one another.  The hope is that through this wrestling a better understanding of the truth will develop with regards to the most important issues facing the world.

An open and honest forum for local faith community leaders

Frederick Faith Debate

The Frederick Faith Debate is designed to be an open an honest forum for local faith community leaders to share and discuss their views of the truth.  Lady Bird Johnson once said, “the clash of ideas is the sound of freedom”.  In that spirit, the show seriously wrestles with important ideas… the participant often disagreeing with one another.  The hope is that through this wrestling a better understanding of the truth will develop with regards to the most important issues facing the world.

In other words, The Frederick Faith Debate is home to conflict resolution on the issues that matter most.  We can’t truly resolve anything without understanding.  And we can’t gain authentic understanding without honesty.  So, that’s what you get here.  A safe haven for honesty.  We share what we hold to be true and why.  Where there’s disagreement, we hash it out.  Because we know why we’re here, there’s no worry over hurt feelings.  At the end, if we fail to persuade each other within the confines of our program’s allotted time, we will at least know not only where we stand, but the reasons that we camp out where we do.