A conversation about how government laws create a "gaming the system" mentality, and how moral choices versus legal ones drive very different behaviors. From handicap parking to healthcare, the hosts explore why more laws often lead to more loopholes — and whether leaving decisions to individuals and businesses might produce better outcomes.

 

0:00 — Intro & show overview

0:29 — Introducing today's topic: loopholes in government

0:56 — Laws vs. morals: are they really the same?

2:13 — Speeding, yellow lights & everyday rule-bending

2:40 — Handicap parking: the conversation that started it all

3:34 — When laws lose legitimacy (VA, over-assigned disability placards)

6:38 — Bad government incentives breed gaming behavior

7:36 — Doctors getting pressured for handicap placards; military enforcement story

9:39 — Emotional support animals: same loophole, different context

11:23 — Should government stay out of it? Moral vs. legal sphere

12:26 — Welcome back; recap of laws vs. morals

12:51 — Airline wheelchair boarding scam ("meeting Jesus at 30,000 feet")

14:14 — Airlines self-regulating boarding without government intervention

14:34 — We unknowingly break 7 laws a week; too many regulations

15:22 — Local Boerne/Kendall County parking situation

17:41 — Is there actually enough parking downtown?

18:31 — Business owners' parking perspective; inviting government in

19:19 — Book rec: *Overruled* by Justice Neil Gorsuch

20:08 — Big corporations don't break laws — they write them with loopholes

21:33 — Ron's insurance work: gaming Obamacare's minimum essential coverage rules

23:11 — How a $60/month plan lets employers avoid all ACA penalties

24:09 — Healthcare law shifts employer focus from care to compliance gaming

24:36 — What if government got out of healthcare entirely? The GM/Ford example

25:29 — From parking to healthcare: all laws distort markets

26:11 — Can we unwind the gaming mindset? The case for trusting people

26:28 — Outro & where to find the podcast

Original Air Date:  August 16th, 2025 at 1:00pm as heard on Boerne Radio 103.9FM

Boost Boerne Business hosted by Baron Wiley

 

Original Air Date: March 21st at 10:30AM CST as heard on Boerne Radio 103.9FM

Contact:
ceasefireboerne@gmail.com 
https://www.theboernebookshop.com/

Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61561356682575 

A conversation about how government laws create a "gaming the system" mentality, and how moral choices versus legal ones drive very different behaviors. From handicap parking to healthcare, the hosts explore why more laws often lead to more loopholes &mdash; and whether leaving decisions to individuals and businesses might produce better outcomes.
&nbsp;
0:00 &mdash; Intro &amp; show overview
0:29 &mdash; Introducing today's topic: loopholes in government
0:56 &mdash; Laws vs. morals: are they really the same?
2:13 &mdash; Speeding, yellow lights &amp; everyday rule-bending
2:40 &mdash; Handicap parking: the conversation that started it all
3:34 &mdash; When laws lose legitimacy (VA, over-assigned disability placards)
6:38 &mdash; Bad government incentives breed gaming behavior
7:36 &mdash; Doctors getting pressured for handicap placards; military enforcement story
9:39 &mdash; Emotional support animals: same loophole, different context
11:23 &mdash; Should government stay out of it? Moral vs. legal sphere
12:26 &mdash; Welcome back; recap of laws vs. morals
12:51 &mdash; Airline wheelchair boarding scam ("meeting Jesus at 30,000 feet")
14:14 &mdash; Airlines self-regulating boarding without government intervention
14:34 &mdash; We unknowingly break 7 laws a week; too many regulations
15:22 &mdash; Local Boerne/Kendall County parking situation
17:41 &mdash; Is there actually enough parking downtown?
18:31 &mdash; Business owners' parking perspective; inviting government in
19:19 &mdash; Book rec: *Overruled* by Justice Neil Gorsuch
20:08 &mdash; Big corporations don't break laws &mdash; they write them with loopholes
21:33 &mdash; Ron's insurance work: gaming Obamacare's minimum essential coverage rules
23:11 &mdash; How a $60/month plan lets employers avoid all ACA penalties
24:09 &mdash; Healthcare law shifts employer focus from care to compliance gaming
24:36 &mdash; What if government got out of healthcare entirely? The GM/Ford example
25:29 &mdash; From parking to healthcare: all laws distort markets
26:11 &mdash; Can we unwind the gaming mindset? The case for trusting people
26:28 &mdash; Outro &amp; where to find the podcast
Original Air Date:&nbsp; August 16th, 2025 at 1:00pm as heard on Boerne Radio 103.9FM
Boost Boerne Business hosted by Baron Wiley
&nbsp;
Original Air Date: March 21st at 10:30AM CST as heard on Boerne Radio 103.9FM
Contact:
<ul>
<li><a href="mailto:ceasefireboerne@gmail.com">ceasefireboerne@gmail.com</a>&nbsp;</li>
<li><a href="https://www.theboernebookshop.com/">https://www.theboernebookshop.com/</a></li>
</ul>
Facebook: &nbsp;<a href="https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61561356682575">https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61561356682575</a>&nbsp;

Ceasefire with Dale Adams and Ron Cisneros

Creating better conversations between citizens and our government, and how you be can be involved in Boerne!

As heard on Boerne Radio 103.9FM every Saturday at 10:30AM.

Ceasefire with Dale Adams and Ron Cisneros
Creating better conversations between citizens and our government, and how you be can be involved in Boerne!
As heard on Boerne Radio 103.9FM every Saturday at 10:30AM.

Ceasefire with Dales Adams and Ron Cisneros

Ceasefire - Loopholes and Government 3-21-2026

Hosts Dale Adams and Ron Cisneros continue their series on ownership, exploring both the legal and philosophical dimensions of what it means to truly possess something.

Key themes covered:

Legal ownership is socially constructed — property, vehicles, intellectual property, and ideas are only "owned" because society agrees to recognize those rights. Without that agreement, ownership collapses.

John Locke's labor theory: You own what you produce through your labor. He also argued you can only rightfully take what you can use — no hoarding.

Rousseau's view: The first person to fence off land and say "this is mine" founded civil society — but only because others agreed.

Epictetus's Stoic view: Nothing external truly belongs to us. What we actually own are our character, judgment, choices, and emotions.

Rights > possessions: The right to own something (e.g., free speech, gun ownership) is more important than the physical possession of it.

Inheritance & legacy control: Is it ethical to dictate what happens to property after death? The hosts argue a true gift should confer full control to the recipient.

We trade true ownership for false ownership: Modern society increasingly recognizes ownership of external things while people give away their emotional self-control and inner life.

Hoarding mentality: Contrasted with Locke's "take only what you can use" — storm-prepping and COVID toilet paper runs as modern examples.

Teaser for next episode: Stewardship — a different lens on ownership.

Timeline

Time     Topic

0:00     Intro / Welcome to Ceasefire

0:29     Episode topic introduced: "What can we truly possess?"

1:09     Legal vs. philosophical ownership — framing the discussion

1:54     Society as the foundation of ownership (Jeep example)

2:27     John Locke's labor theory of ownership

3:50     Inheritance — recognizing a deceased person's right to transfer

4:39     Transferring ideals, not just property — "my homestead stays a homestead"

5:52     True gifts should bestow full control; controlling from beyond the grave

6:11     Rousseau: the first fence = the birth of civil society

6:59     Ownership depends on societal agreement — what if we disagree?

7:33     Epictetus: the only true possessions are character, judgment, choices, emotions

8:26     "You can't take it with you" — nor enforce your will after death

9:02     We've traded inner ownership for ownership of things

9:47     "He made me angry" — we allow others to control our emotions

10:28  We give away emotions for "pennies on the dollar"

10:49  "Take ownership" — the phrase as a cultural echo of inner ownership

11:37  Can we own relationships? A biblical "two become one" perspective

12:18  Ad break: Bernie Bookshop

13:00  Back from break — relationships and biblical ownership

14:13  You own how hard you work and the consequences of your decisions

15:02  Legal ownership revisited: property tax, gas tax — ongoing obligations

16:05  Legal ownership is contingent — "ownership light"

17:36  Rights are more important than physical possession

18:17  Even the right to own is ultimately meaningless — Solomonic view

18:38  Book recommendation: Why We Drive by Matthew Crawford

19:14  Whiskey and Wisdom Book Club — April 16th, 6 PM

20:20  "Ownership light" — two words needed for different kinds of ownership

21:09  Locke's limit: only own what you can use without waste

22:04  Hoarding examples: COVID toilet paper, gas can in a pickup during Harvey

23:02  Clarifying: saving ≠ hoarding; about fair share, not nest eggs

23:43  We'd all be better off understanding what we truly own — character matters

24:03  Teaser: next episode on Stewardship

24:20  Outro / Where to find the show

Original Air Date: April 4th at 10:30AM CST as heard on Boerne Radio 103.9FM

Contact:
ceasefireboerne@gmail.com 
https://www.theboernebookshop.com/

Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61561356682575 

Hosts Dale Adams and Ron Cisneros continue their series on ownership, exploring both the legal and philosophical dimensions of what it means to truly possess something.
Key themes covered:
Legal ownership is socially constructed &mdash; property, vehicles, intellectual property, and ideas are only "owned" because society agrees to recognize those rights. Without that agreement, ownership collapses.
John Locke's labor theory: You own what you produce through your labor. He also argued you can only rightfully take what you can use &mdash; no hoarding.
Rousseau's view: The first person to fence off land and say "this is mine" founded civil society &mdash; but only because others agreed.
Epictetus's Stoic view: Nothing external truly belongs to us. What we actually own are our character, judgment, choices, and emotions.
Rights &gt; possessions: The right to own something (e.g., free speech, gun ownership) is more important than the physical possession of it.
Inheritance &amp; legacy control: Is it ethical to dictate what happens to property after death? The hosts argue a true gift should confer full control to the recipient.
We trade true ownership for false ownership: Modern society increasingly recognizes ownership of external things while people give away their emotional self-control and inner life.
Hoarding mentality: Contrasted with Locke's "take only what you can use" &mdash; storm-prepping and COVID toilet paper runs as modern examples.
Teaser for next episode: Stewardship &mdash; a different lens on ownership.
Timeline
Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Topic
0:00&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Intro / Welcome to Ceasefire
0:29&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Episode topic introduced: "What can we truly possess?"
1:09&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Legal vs. philosophical ownership &mdash; framing the discussion
1:54&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Society as the foundation of ownership (Jeep example)
2:27&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; John Locke's labor theory of ownership
3:50&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Inheritance &mdash; recognizing a deceased person's right to transfer
4:39&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Transferring ideals, not just property &mdash; "my homestead stays a homestead"
5:52&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; True gifts should bestow full control; controlling from beyond the grave
6:11&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Rousseau: the first fence = the birth of civil society
6:59&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Ownership depends on societal agreement &mdash; what if we disagree?
7:33&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Epictetus: the only true possessions are character, judgment, choices, emotions
8:26&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; "You can't take it with you" &mdash; nor enforce your will after death
9:02&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; We've traded inner ownership for ownership of things
9:47&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; "He made me angry" &mdash; we allow others to control our emotions
10:28&nbsp; We give away emotions for "pennies on the dollar"
10:49&nbsp; "Take ownership" &mdash; the phrase as a cultural echo of inner ownership
11:37&nbsp; Can we own relationships? A biblical "two become one" perspective
12:18&nbsp; Ad break: Bernie Bookshop
13:00&nbsp; Back from break &mdash; relationships and biblical ownership
14:13&nbsp; You own how hard you work and the consequences of your decisions
15:02&nbsp; Legal ownership revisited: property tax, gas tax &mdash; ongoing obligations
16:05&nbsp; Legal ownership is contingent &mdash; "ownership light"
17:36&nbsp; Rights are more important than physical possession
18:17&nbsp; Even the right to own is ultimately meaningless &mdash; Solomonic view
18:38&nbsp; Book recommendation: Why We Drive by Matthew Crawford
19:14&nbsp; Whiskey and Wisdom Book Club &mdash; April 16th, 6 PM
20:20&nbsp; "Ownership light" &mdash; two words needed for different kinds of ownership
21:09&nbsp; Locke's limit: only own what you can use without waste
22:04&nbsp; Hoarding examples: COVID toilet paper, gas can in a pickup during Harvey
23:02&nbsp; Clarifying: saving &ne; hoarding; about fair share, not nest eggs
23:43&nbsp; We'd all be better off understanding what we truly own &mdash; character matters
24:03&nbsp; Teaser: next episode on Stewardship
24:20&nbsp; Outro / Where to find the show
Original Air Date: April 4th at 10:30AM CST as heard on Boerne Radio 103.9FM
Contact:
<ul>
<li><a href="mailto:ceasefireboerne@gmail.com">ceasefireboerne@gmail.com</a>&nbsp;</li>
<li><a href="https://www.theboernebookshop.com/">https://www.theboernebookshop.com/</a></li>
</ul>
Facebook: &nbsp;<a href="https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61561356682575">https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61561356682575</a>&nbsp;

Ceasefire - What Do We Truly Possess  4-4-2026 

Dale Adams and Ron Cisneros, hosts of the Ceasefire podcast, explore whether Americans are truly "living on stolen land" — a question sparked by Billie Eilish's Grammy speech. They examine property rights through political, legal, and historical lenses, arguing that ownership has always depended on force, self-determination, and legal frameworks — not inherent right. They discuss the 1933 Montevideo Convention's definition of statehood, apply it to modern cases (Taiwan, Ukraine, Israel), and critique land acknowledgment statements as empty gestures. They conclude that land is conquered or purchased, not "stolen," since ownership only exists within a political structure willing to enforce it. The episode ends with a teaser for Part 2 and a book recommendation.

 

Timeline:

 

Time  Topic

0:00   Intro & show opening

0:30   Topic introduction: "Are we living on stolen land?" (3-part series)

0:50   Billie Eilish's Grammy comments as the catalyst

1:35   How states form: conquest, revolution, purchase

2:39   Ownership is backed by force

3:51   Self-determination as the foundation of statehood

4:36   History of property rights: nomadic to agricultural societies

6:28   The 1933 Montevideo Convention & legal statehood

7:26   Taiwan, Ukraine, Israel — modern statehood questions

8:15   "There truly is no stolen land" — the core argument

9:20   The problem with historical claims — where do you draw borders?

10:42 Stable borders are historically unnatural

11:24 Billie Eilish backlash & the $3M home question

13:26 Break / Boerne Bookshop ad

14:24 Property taxes & the stewardship argument

16:40 Property rights as a "bundle of rights" — digital, airwave, privacy

19:04 Land acknowledgment statements — virtue signaling vs. action

20:05 British Columbia court case — when acknowledgments become legal

21:27 "Return it to whom?" — the statute of limitations problem

23:19 You can't undo historical injustice — displacement goes both ways

24:17 Book recommendation & sign-off

Original Air Date: March 28th at 10:30AM CST as heard on Boerne Radio 103.9FM

Contact:
ceasefireboerne@gmail.com 
https://www.theboernebookshop.com/

Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61561356682575 

Dale Adams and Ron Cisneros, hosts of the Ceasefire podcast, explore whether Americans are truly "living on stolen land" &mdash; a question sparked by Billie Eilish's Grammy speech. They examine property rights through political, legal, and historical lenses, arguing that ownership has always depended on force, self-determination, and legal frameworks &mdash; not inherent right. They discuss the 1933 Montevideo Convention's definition of statehood, apply it to modern cases (Taiwan, Ukraine, Israel), and critique land acknowledgment statements as empty gestures. They conclude that land is conquered or purchased, not "stolen," since ownership only exists within a political structure willing to enforce it. The episode ends with a teaser for Part 2 and a book recommendation.
&nbsp;
Timeline:
&nbsp;
Time&nbsp; Topic
0:00&nbsp;&nbsp; Intro &amp; show opening
0:30&nbsp;&nbsp; Topic introduction: "Are we living on stolen land?" (3-part series)
0:50&nbsp;&nbsp; Billie Eilish's Grammy comments as the catalyst
1:35&nbsp;&nbsp; How states form: conquest, revolution, purchase
2:39&nbsp;&nbsp; Ownership is backed by force
3:51&nbsp;&nbsp; Self-determination as the foundation of statehood
4:36&nbsp;&nbsp; History of property rights: nomadic to agricultural societies
6:28&nbsp;&nbsp; The 1933 Montevideo Convention &amp; legal statehood
7:26&nbsp;&nbsp; Taiwan, Ukraine, Israel &mdash; modern statehood questions
8:15&nbsp;&nbsp; "There truly is no stolen land" &mdash; the core argument
9:20&nbsp;&nbsp; The problem with historical claims &mdash; where do you draw borders?
10:42 Stable borders are historically unnatural
11:24 Billie Eilish backlash &amp; the $3M home question
13:26 Break / Boerne Bookshop ad
14:24 Property taxes &amp; the stewardship argument
16:40 Property rights as a "bundle of rights" &mdash; digital, airwave, privacy
19:04 Land acknowledgment statements &mdash; virtue signaling vs. action
20:05 British Columbia court case &mdash; when acknowledgments become legal
21:27 "Return it to whom?" &mdash; the statute of limitations problem
23:19 You can't undo historical injustice &mdash; displacement goes both ways
24:17 Book recommendation &amp; sign-off
Original Air Date: March 28th at 10:30AM CST as heard on Boerne Radio 103.9FM
Contact:
<ul>
<li><a href="mailto:ceasefireboerne@gmail.com">ceasefireboerne@gmail.com</a>&nbsp;</li>
<li><a href="https://www.theboernebookshop.com/">https://www.theboernebookshop.com/</a></li>
</ul>
Facebook: &nbsp;<a href="https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61561356682575">https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61561356682575</a>&nbsp;

Ceasefire -  Are We Really Living on Stolen Land   3-28-2026

Dale Adams and Ron Cisneros explore the difference between being a legal resident of the City of Boerne versus being part of the broader Boerne community. They dig into how Texas municipal incorporation works, why governance boundaries matter, and what it means to be a "stakeholder" vs. a true citizen — touching on voting rights, taxation, and the importance of elected officials staying in their lane.

Timeline

0:00 – Intro & show overview

0:29 – Today's topic: What makes you a citizen of Boerne?

1:15 – Texas law: How cities incorporate (general law cities, population minimums, boundaries)

2:00 – The case of Comfort: a town, not a legally incorporated city

2:27 – City limits define who are the true legal residents

3:27 – The "community of Boerne" vs. the "city of Boerne" — and why people blur the line

6:35 – Ron: "I live outside city limits but have a business inside — am I a citizen?" (Answer: No, you're a stakeholder)

7:55 – What is a stakeholder? (A deliberately vague term)

12:55 – Why there must be a defined group of people who can vote and make decisions

13:15 – Unifying factors: BISD school district, zip code, area codes

16:15 – When Ron was on city council: balancing "community" voices vs. constituent voices

12:26 – Break / Boerne Bookshop ad

13:07 – Back from break

13:47 – Why Ron refused to weigh in on a controversial out-of-city project: "Staying in my lane"

15:25 – Analogy: Californians telling Texas what to do

17:45 – We need each other: city and county are interconnected

19:21 – Governance requires lines; communities don't

20:23 – Buc-ee's controversy: why it wasn't Comfort's decision

21:05 – Book recommendations at the Boerne Bookshop

22:02 – Bernie Radio listeners as a global "Boerne community" — the Kansas dog-walker story

23:56 – Tootie Pie sends a pie to a listener in Kansas

24:39 – "Good fences make good neighbors" — knowing your lane in government

25:12 – Civics matters: understanding the roles of city vs. county government

25:52 – Mayoral election story: county residents couldn't vote for Frank Ritchie

27:00 – Final thought: Focus your civic energy where you actually have a say

27:35 – Outro

Original Air Date: March 14th at 10:30AM CST as heard on Boerne Radio 103.9FM

Contact:
ceasefireboerne@gmail.com 
https://www.theboernebookshop.com/

Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61561356682575 

 

Dale Adams and Ron Cisneros explore the difference between being a legal resident of the City of Boerne versus being part of the broader Boerne community. They dig into how Texas municipal incorporation works, why governance boundaries matter, and what it means to be a "stakeholder" vs. a true citizen &mdash; touching on voting rights, taxation, and the importance of elected officials staying in their lane.
Timeline
0:00 &ndash; Intro &amp; show overview
0:29 &ndash; Today's topic: What makes you a citizen of Boerne?
1:15 &ndash; Texas law: How cities incorporate (general law cities, population minimums, boundaries)
2:00 &ndash; The case of Comfort: a town, not a legally incorporated city
2:27 &ndash; City limits define who are the true legal residents
3:27 &ndash; The "community of Boerne" vs. the "city of Boerne" &mdash; and why people blur the line
6:35 &ndash; Ron: "I live outside city limits but have a business inside &mdash; am I a citizen?" (Answer: No, you're a stakeholder)
7:55 &ndash; What is a stakeholder? (A deliberately vague term)
12:55 &ndash; Why there must be a defined group of people who can vote and make decisions
13:15 &ndash; Unifying factors: BISD school district, zip code, area codes
16:15 &ndash; When Ron was on city council: balancing "community" voices vs. constituent voices
12:26 &ndash; Break / Boerne Bookshop ad
13:07 &ndash; Back from break
13:47 &ndash; Why Ron refused to weigh in on a controversial out-of-city project: "Staying in my lane"
15:25 &ndash; Analogy: Californians telling Texas what to do
17:45 &ndash; We need each other: city and county are interconnected
19:21 &ndash; Governance requires lines; communities don't
20:23 &ndash; Buc-ee's controversy: why it wasn't Comfort's decision
21:05 &ndash; Book recommendations at the Boerne Bookshop
22:02 &ndash; Bernie Radio listeners as a global "Boerne community" &mdash; the Kansas dog-walker story
23:56 &ndash; Tootie Pie sends a pie to a listener in Kansas
24:39 &ndash; "Good fences make good neighbors" &mdash; knowing your lane in government
25:12 &ndash; Civics matters: understanding the roles of city vs. county government
25:52 &ndash; Mayoral election story: county residents couldn't vote for Frank Ritchie
27:00 &ndash; Final thought: Focus your civic energy where you actually have a say
27:35 &ndash; Outro
Original Air Date: March 14th at 10:30AM CST as heard on Boerne Radio 103.9FM
Contact:
<ul>
<li><a href="mailto:ceasefireboerne@gmail.com">ceasefireboerne@gmail.com</a>&nbsp;</li>
<li><a href="https://www.theboernebookshop.com/">https://www.theboernebookshop.com/</a></li>
</ul>
Facebook: &nbsp;<a href="https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61561356682575">https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61561356682575</a>&nbsp;
&nbsp;

Ceasefire - Loopholes and Government 3-21-2026

In 1 playlist(s)

Ceasefire with Dales Adams and Ron Cisneros

Social links

Follow podcast

Recent clips