Stephen Phipson, CEO of Make UK, says Britain should negotiate a trade deal, as the country faces a 10% blanket US tariff, as well as steel and vehicles tariffs. He tells Bloomberg's Caroline Hepker and Valerie Tytel that the Labour government's effort to develop the relationship with the Trump White House has been "impressive" but 45% of all UK exports are manufactured products.
Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.
The Make UK lobby representing manufacturers across bitten says that the tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump are devastating for UK manufacturing, but according to Bloomberg reporting, British officials say that the UK is getting mixed signals on whether this ten percent have is permanent or not, and the UK government continues to pursue a UK US bilateral trade deal. Joining us this morning is Stephen Phipson, who is CEO of Make UK, the lobby that represents UK manufacturing businesses. Stephen, welcome back to Bloomberg Radio. Thanks for your time. Look, I'll cut to the chase. We know that it's bad ten percent tariffs anyway you slice it. How tough should the British government be with the UK? The indication is not very well.
Actually, Callen.
What we should be doing is negotiating a deal. So we're fully behind what's happened so far in terms of Keir Starmer trying to really you know, develop that relationship with the US government, which is which has been very very impressive so far, and the tirelest efforts of the Business Secretary to try and negotiate and our push is to try to get a negotiated deal. We don't think it's in anyone's interest to try to escalate. And I think in terms of the effect on manufacturing, ten percent, you know, sounds reasonable, but don't forget we've got twenty five percent on our automobile sector, which is really really challenging. We've got quite a large automotive activity in the UK, we've got the steel tariffs, and of course the other problem is that a lot of our exports in the supply chain go to the EU. So with the EU at twenty percent, if those volumes drop off, that has a direct impact on UK manufacturing volumes. So we think the way through this is to really concentrate on trying to see if we can negotiate.
A deal with the US.
Okay, step, when you're talking about negotiating, you're obviously not thinking that escalating is the best way out of this. But what does Britain have to concede to bring down these tariffs?
Well, that's a very interesting point, I think. I mean, so far these tarots have been concentrating, of course on products. There may be something on the services side, particularly because that's the large import. If you like into the UK from the US, so we might see where the government goes with that. At the moment, they're not sharing the details of what the negotiations look like, but.
They are assuring us that they are making progress.
So are your members saying anything to you about what possibly could should be conceded.
Well, not directly in terms of manufacturing. What they're really focused on the moment. At the moment is trying to work through the detail and trying to understand what this effect is going to be. I think it's pretty clear with automotive and there's a lot of concern about what that's going to do to volumes. But of course many of the other things we're exporting our high technology, advanced manufacturing products to the United States, many of those companies have never done really got involved in tariffs before, so there's a lot of concern about what that's going to do to volumes. So really there's a lot of uncertainty at the moment. There's also some some big questions going on, I think, which is also worth thinking about, particularly Northern Ireland.
I mean, that's a complex situation.
We've got a number of really important manufacturing sites in an eye they've now got the situation between two borders twenty percent on one side, ten percent on the other.
The winds of framework.
Everyone's unclear as to how that's going to work in this scenario. So there's quite a lot of detail to run through at this stage the game. We're talking about the initial reactions here.
Yeah, absolutely, Northern Island immensely complicated, isn't it. For really, it's because Northern Ireland has effectively stayed within Europe for kind of practical purposes because of the border issue. In terms of the overall view though, I mean, is Britain basically breathing a sigh of relief. Eighty percent of our economy and services led, so you know, if we have to sacrifice a bit of manufacturing. The government seems to be saying, you know, we're fine with that. You know, let's just, you know, let's hope that the US doesn't think about the kind of services side of the business. Is that is that the idea? Do you think that the UK will go into a recession? It won't surely as a result of this.
Well, well again we have to see the effect on volumes. One thing I would point out, I mean, the government is taking the manufacturing issue very seriously.
It's forty five percent of our exports.
So a really important part of the export activity of the UK in terms of a trading nation are manufactured products, most of them advanced manufacturing products one form or another, from commercial aerospace to defense, to luxury vehicles, that sort of stuff, and so that is and of course it creates high quality jobs in the UK, and any reduction in volume is a direct effect on jobs. We have two point six million people in the manufacturing sector and it's that effect really not just the direct effect, but just to go through that again, kind it is that indirect effect of what happens with the EU volumes, which is about half of the exports of manufactured products from this country.
Stephen, We've had analysis from Bloomberg Economics talking about the percent of exports from the EU that are now at risk to the US. They see them dropping by nearly fifty percent, and then even China's exports to the US dropping by eighty percent. You know, these countries are going to try to scramble to figure out where else they can sell these goods. Are your members worried about perhaps the dumping of cheaper goods into the UK economy, perhaps putting your business model at risk or under pressure.
Yeah, we are certainly concerned about trade diversion. I mean we have been experiencing that anyway in the steel sector, and the UK's had a pretty good safeguarding regime that's responded quickly to dumping, for example, of Chinese steel into the UK when when steel is diverted from one market which they're restricted from and we have an open border, and of course what they're going to have to do now is extend that to look at other products where we have a significant trade diversion effect. So again we're going to need to really ramp up the response of that agency in the UK to be able to put in the right safeguards, the appropriate safeguards when those issues arise.
But we are experienced of doing that in steel, for example.
You could well out something quite tough against the US. We don't know. France is a manual MACO urging European companies to pause spending in the US. The UK's got potentially this kind of choice, does it try to get closer to the EU or closer to I end up closer to the US A lot of people I know, So that there isn't a choice, but there surely is.
What's your view, Well, we are stuck between both of them, to be honest with you, and I know the government's been treading a really fine line on this issue.
But as I said, we have you know, the.
US as a single market is the most important export market for UK goods. The UK as a block is the biggest trading partner, so the massive volumes that go to the U. So ideally the government's trying to find this real really this sweet spot, this fine line in between the two, to be able to not choose. But you'll hear that phrase constantly from the government, not choosing between one partner and another, and they will continue to try to do that, but I think it's going to be increasingly difficult if we see retalia from the EU.
Steve and I just want to pivot the conversation to defense because that's I guess an area that not only in the UK but also in Europe is likely to be seeing big investment inflows. Is the UK manufacturing perhaps make up some of this some of this capacity from the Trump tariffs with defense?
Well, defense is growing anyway substantially, as you can imagine at the moment, we're seeing some significant growth in the defense sector. We're also very interested in this idea of collaboration across Europe, and there's a lot of discussions around what we might do with other European countries, and we've already got experience of doing that. We do that with complex weapons, with missile systems for example, NBDA would be a very good example of that. We've done it with Typhoon, and there's a real discussion about how to increase that collaboration across Europe. Interestingly, that might result in actually easing some of the trade barriers that we've got with Europe at the moment, because if you start doing things across border on defence in more volume, you might end up having a better regime for customs and those sorts of things. So it might be a way of easing some of those tensions. But we certainly see demand increasing at the moment, and I think that collaborative collaboration across Europe is going to be a good thing for UK manufacturing and defense.
Do you think that there's going to be a major dampening effect in terms of manufacturing as a result of the whole tariff regime and not just that the major change in thinking, the rewiring the entire foundations of the global trading system, that the trust being lost. Do you think that that has a dampening effect for your members on what they do?
Actually what it really has an effect on, and that's investment, because investment cycles and manufacturing are long. You know, it's between seven and thirty years in terms of investing in new factories, new plant and machinery, those sorts of things. And in this environment where you're not sure, I mean with the Trump tarifs, we're not sure if that's going to last a month, six months, a year, is it going to change. Do you build your factory in the US the next factory expansion, do you build it somewhere else? And so going to be very uncertain about that investment part which drives your manufacturing efficiency, and that's going to have a significant dampening effect unless there's some clarity in this in the short term