AstraZeneca CFO Talks Tariffs, Forward Guidance, Earnings

Published Apr 30, 2025, 10:28 AM

AstraZeneca is a posterchild of the UK stock market as Britain's largest listed company. So it's telling that it too is warning that there is a risk a trade war could damage both its bottom line and its drug development Bloomberg's Caroline Hepker and Stephen Carroll spoke to the pharmaceutical giant's CFO Aradhana Sarin as the company posted its first quarter earnings figures.

The medicines that we provide are essential medicines, whether it's an ecology or rare diseases or cardiovascular So there is a public health element here and drug shortages and things like that that one needs to take into account, you know, if any tariffs were to be to be implied. And then also one has to take into account the fact that manufacturing and supply chains are not a lift and shift. You know, these are highly complex manufacturing supply chains and they need to be regulated and quality controlled and approved by the FDA, etc. So there's also a time element to moving supply chains.

President Trump there has repeatedly said that TE plans to apply levies to the pharmaceutical sector, although it seems to seems to be paused for the moment. If there are US tariffs on imputed meds into the US, who pays? Is it companies? Is it US consumers? You just mentioned how complex it would be for firms like Astra Zeneca.

Yeah, so I would say, you know, again, every company is different. We're actually in a very fortunate position for manufacturing, so we have thirty one manufacturing slits globally. Over the last several years, we've actually been manufacturing, investing in manufacturing separately in China, you know, in the US, in Europe and our manufacturing is fairly segregated. So the product we manufacture in China is for China and emerging markets, and we have eleven of those thirty one manufacturing sites in the US. The vast majority of the product that we that we sell in the US is actually manufactured domestically. There is a minority of product that we do import from Europe into the US. However, as you know, for pharmaceutical product, we always maintain dual sources of supply, so that will require you know, if there were caraffs put on Europe, that would require some sort of measure of changing those supply chains. But that's a process that we've already started to rebalance the amount that comes from Europe versus the US for those minority of products.

Pascal Soyo, who was speaking to Bloomberg, also talked a bit about the innovation in your sector, the innovation being mostly paid for by America, Europe and mitture countries have to invest more in farmer innovation. Was his message that the model is unbalanced. Too much funding in the United States. Do you expect more investment in drug innovation in Europe. Now, President Trump's push in the defense sector move the needle significantly on spending. Will it do the same in the farmer industry.

Well, that's our hope, but obviously it's not for me to comment on. I think Pascal has also talked about this concept of health sovereignty, and it's both from making sure that patients in Europe have access to the best medicines, the best innovation in a timely manner, and that's important for the patients and the citizens of that country, but also that Europe maintains and spends more on innovation and innovative drugs, and that will attract more investments in R and D and more investments in manufacturing and so forth. So I think it is in the best interest of Europe, but obviously that's a policy matter and budget matter that they'll need to consider.

As to drop to plan four hundred and fifty million pounds investment here in the UK at the start of this year, Chance of rahel Reeves then called Astra one of the great companies. You said that in January as she was setting out her plans to try to kickstart the UK economy saying she was determined to make Britain the best place in the world to invest. Are you seeing any benefits at all that you could point to of this attitude from the government, the need for more economic growth, of focus on growth as the Labor government has talked about.

Uh not yet, So we haven't really seen any of that yet. I think bescal And has often mentioned an example of this, which it relates to in her two which I would say, you know, has one of has been one of the key innovative drugs in breast cancer, probably the best innovation in the last twenty years as it relates to breast cancer, and that is not reimbursed in the UK. So, you know, it's industrial policy is obviously one thing, but obviously access to medicines is also important because you know, if you think about where we do our studies and where we invest R and D investment, you know, eventually at the end of all of that, we do want patients in that country to have access to medicine. So you know, if we spend all the money in research and then patients don't benefit in that country, that's very disappointing.

Yeah, So perhaps NHS patients in the UK missing out on that. In terms of vaccines, the takeup of important vaccines also is falling in the US and here in the UK and worldwide. I want to ask you about the MMR vaccine, the measles, mumps and Rebella vaccine. Are you concerned at astra about the decline in vaccine take up in the US and the UK.

So we don't actually supply vaccines, either childhood or adult vaccines, so we're not really in the vaccine business. So from a business standpoint, we we don't really have any concern. I know it's a public health issue obviously that needs to be addressed.

Coming back to some of the diversification of your supply chains that you mentioned earlier as well from a cost point of view, At a financial point of view for the company, what is the added cost of producing in a siloed sort of fashion that you described versus the more integrated global supply chains.

You know, it's hard to say, you know, which is more efficient because again every product is different. Components for manufacturing do come from from different places. But you also have reduced shipping costs for example, you know when you have more segregated supply chains. But I also when I talked about moving some of the supply and manufacturing from Europe to the US. We already have, as I said, eleven manufacturing sites, and many of them actually have additional capacity. So it would be, you know, some incremental investment for US, but you know, very from a marginal standpoint, it would not be a lot of investment.

Bloomberg Talks

Curating today’s top interviews from around Bloomberg News. Hear conversations with the biggest name 
Social links
Follow podcast
Recent clips
Browse 2,059 clip(s)