(Bloomberg) -- Nate Persily, a professor at Stanford University Law School, discusses why the Supreme Court dealt a setback to the voter-identification movement, refusing to reinstate North Carolina ballot restrictions, leaving intact a lower court ruling that said the provisions were racially discriminatory. He speaks with June Grasso and Greg Stohr on Bloomberg Radio's "Bloomberg Law."

<p>(Bloomberg) -- Nate Persily, a professor at Stanford University Law School, discusses why the Supreme Court dealt a setback to the voter-identification movement, refusing to reinstate North Carolina ballot restrictions, leaving intact a lower court ruling that said the provisions were racially discriminatory. He speaks with June Grasso and Greg Stohr on Bloomberg Radio's "Bloomberg Law."</p>

June Grasso speaks with prominent attorneys and scholars, analyzing legal issues and cases in the news.

<p>June Grasso speaks with prominent attorneys and scholars, analyzing legal issues and cases in the news.</p>

Hosts June Grasso speaks with prominent attorneys and legal scholars, analyzing major legal issues and cases in the news.

Bloomberg Law

Supreme Court Decides Against Reviving NC Voter-ID Law (Audio)

https://api.omny.fm/orgs/e73c998e-6e60-432f-8610-ae210140c5b1/clips/6abcd4b9-1d6e-48cc-b077-ae2b006781de/transcript

Advertisement