(Bloomberg) -- Nate Persily, a professor at Stanford University Law School, discusses why the Supreme Court dealt a setback to the voter-identification movement, refusing to reinstate North Carolina ballot restrictions, leaving intact a lower court ruling that said the provisions were racially discriminatory. He speaks with June Grasso and Greg Stohr on Bloomberg Radio's "Bloomberg Law."

Weekend Law: Trump's $1.8B Fund, Luigi Mangione Evidence & ICE Barred
38:05

Castro Indicted, Death Penalty & Police Sue Over Trump Fund
32:20

No ICE Arrests in NYC Immigration Courts
37:32