In hour 3 of The Armstrong & Getty Show
Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio the George Washington Broadcast Center. Jack Armstrong is Joe Getty.
Armstrong and Getty and now he Armstrong and Getty. Are you following this whole thing with the steel company being a US steel company being sold Japan, all the candidates and the presidents, so five people are against it? The Business Voice Wall Street Journal says they're all wrong. We'll talk about that later.
Among other interesting and misguided economic plans and policies that have surfaced during the election.
I hope you can stay tuned for that. Do you know who Douglas Murray is.
He is a brit He is a writer, thinker, historian, and he has no time for your bull crap.
That's kind of his manner, if you will.
He has long been my hero. He and Matt Taibi teamed up to utterly flog Malcolm Gladwell and Michelle Goldstein of The New York Times in a debate about whether we should trust the mainstream media. It was a stunning victory of good sense and truth against progressive blather. Anyway, he was on Piers Morgan, as he often is the other day. Piers Morgan's show in the Just in Britain at this pointers he flogging the ears and eyes of Americans as well.
I don't think he's on anywhere in the United States. Of course.
The internet is what am I saying? How old am I?
The Internet is like the whole world. It's as if it's a worldwide I don't know web anyway. So he was on talking about the situation in Israel, Hamas, the college protesters, etc. And his prosecution of the case was so incredibly skillful and eloquent we thought we would share it with you. We've divided it up into chunks. Jack feel free obviously to jump in wherever you want and we'll discuss. But we'll kick it off with ninety four Michael and just go in order.
Do you not feel that something has to give here, that this has to get resolved somehow, and that the only way to do that is, as with all these situations, you have to eventually compromise in some way. And the problem for Netanyao is that people think he is completely incapable of offering Hamas any compromise, and therefore there is no deal. So the families of the hostage are still there and hundreds of thousands of protesters in Israel on the street to Tel Aviv right now. They are of the firm belief that it's his own intractable position on this which is not going to allow any kind of cease far to be achievable.
But there again, if I can says appears it's the same thing, which is the presumption that it's Netanyahu who is uncompromising. We end up with this again because nettnya who's a democratically elected leader, and so it's assumed that some pressure can be brought to bear on him. In my view, it is not Netanyah who's uncompromising. It's Hamaza's uncompromising.
So he's just getting going.
But I thought peers did a reasonably good job of steel manning, as they say, the argument of the mobs in the streets yelling at Netnahoo he's got to compromise and make a deal.
Yeah, I've got comment on that, but I want to hear the rest of what Marie as is say. Okay, roll on, Michael.
They could have handed back the hostages last October. They could have not done this. I mean, they could have tried to build a state since two thousand and five when Israel withdrew from the Gaza and handed the place over to them. Hamas could have used the billions of dollars and pounds and euros that British and European and American taxpayers gave them since two thousand and six. They could have used those billions of dollars to build up Gaza. They could have made a booming in the good sense of the term Mediterranean paradise. They could have created for their people. He finishes the point the next club. But you know what they did. They built down instead of upwards. They built a tunnel network bigger than the London underground for all of those years, and they squirreled away the money, just like yasa Arafat did before them, and they made themselves rich. Why was Ishmael Hahnir worth billions of dollars? Why does Kalid Machal why is he worth billions of dollars? Why are there their children like princelings who live in in apartment complexes in Doha. Because they took the money of Americans and Brits and Europeans and they took it for themselves and kept the people of Gaza in the miseration and poverty.
Man. I'm looking at NBC News right now, and they've got they're doing the story and they're showing Net Nyahu in front of a big map. He did a presentation that was running on the news in Israel yesterday explaining the Philadelphia Corridor and Gaza and how all the stuff comes in that. Douglas Murray is just talking about that's how, that's how they got everything in for those tunnels, and have you managed to get around all the various sanctions and rules and that sort of stuff. And then the headline up there in NBC is growing pressure on net and Yahoo. Okay, that's true in a sense, but not near to the extent that everybody's claiming. It's still just barely but majority opinion in Israel, they agree with Net Yahoo and his war cabinet. The other day, is government had a vote on whether or not to stay there in the Philadelphia Corridor and it wasn't even a close vote. So the mainstream media is acting like the protesters are by far the majority opinion in a parliamentary government, where where if it was the majority opinion, they would have already won the argument.
It's like when you have two hundred and fifty college kids and Antifa members trying to stir them up, and you press the camera in close. And even if it's thousands in New York, there are hundreds of thousands, millions who think they're crack pots. But it makes for good TV. I think it's worth considering and to arrive at the conclusions the college types have takes such a willful ignorance of history or just you know, an accidental ignorance because your Marxist college professors have been indoctrinating you. But when Israel pulled out of Gazin was it five or six, doesn't matter, it's going on twenty years ago. They said, all right, we're out your self governing. Elect who you want. God bless you, good luck. We're not going to interfere in your affairs. And they elected Hamas. Hamas took power and then canceled subsequent elections as totalitarians ten two. But during that period, as Muttery was making clear, we the West showered billions and billions and billions of dollars on the Palestinian people in Gaza and the Western Bank for that matter.
And what did they do with that money?
Build themselves a Mediterranean paradise, a booming, a city, a series of cities with schools to be admired and in fabulous commerce and tourism and the rest of it. No, they built tunnels purely for the purpose of wiping the Jews off the map. That's what they did with your money for almost twenty years. So the idea that net Nyahu needs to be flexible and come to an agreement, you've.
Got to ignore all of that.
Next clip that has been since two thousand and five a complete counterfactual of what could have happened. But the Hamaz leadership didn't want that. They have said themselves, they want to use Palestinian children and their lives in order to pressurize the world. These are fanatics. They want the death of their own citizens, their own citizens, in order to get world opinion turned against Israel again.
How do you negotiate with that?
Reminds me of what you're saying about the Reagan biopic that's coming out that was focused on his philosophy and his recognition that we.
Got to call evil out for being evil. Don't get all academic on it all the time. It's fine to get into the details, but you got to call evil out for being evil. So I wish there could be a debate between who would whoever would represent represent the college kids side versus Douglas Murray on this topic, because I'd love to hear that.
Yeah, And I've seen them do that sort of debate, and it's it's what debate ought to be. It's very respectful, it's forceful, but they listen to each other and respond to each other and and counter each other's claims.
I would love that. But without going back to the history of the founding Israel or maybe even two thousand years ago or whatever, if you just stay what with today. I don't understand the argument, the debate that's going on in the streets in Israel right now that I was just talking about the should Israel pull out of that corridor that they're trying to keep more arms, money, food, whatever from flowing into Hamas. The people on the street say no, no, no, Hamas wants us out of there, so we should get out and they'll give the hostages back. I don't understand that argument, I guess unless you're just naively believe Hamas is going to live up to what they just said, Well, sure, sure, you get out of there, we'll give the hostages back and we'll stop trying to kill you. Well, that makes you a nun. That makes you a nut.
Yeah, it's incredibly naive or desperate. If I was terrified every day that Hamas was going to put a bullet in my daughter's head, as they did a couple of people's daughters the other day, yeah I would.
I would probably say, you've got to risk.
Everything to get the hostages home, but it will create many more hostages in the years to come. One more clip from Douglas Murray. I appreciate this one because it speaks to the ridiculous naivete of the comfortable, affluent West.
The assumptional in the.
West today because we're so sort of fat and lazy in our expectation that piece is the norm, and that historically it's the norm. We're so full of our own expectations and presumptions that we always think that wars end by some kind of compromise and coming around the table, to use a cliche, They don't. Historically, most wars end because one side wins and one side loses. And one of the reasons, in my view, why there is this endless rounds of war in this region is because the Israelis are never allowed to win and Hamas in this case are always allowed to draw. And I think that that is simply to set up the precursor for the next conflict. If Hamas come out of this with a fighting capability, then there will be another round of this war in a couple of years. So when David Lammy and others say what we need to have is a piece deal, I'd say on what terms? Everybody wants peace except for Hamaz and the fanatics. Everybody else wants peace. All of these people in the south, these Kabbutzniks, and the party goers and others who were murdered on the seven all dreamed of peace with their Palestinian neighbors and brothers and sisters who stopped that piece being possible Hamas from two thousand and five and again to this very day.
So that part about war's end, when one side has been defeated almost all the time, rarely is there any other way that a war ends reminded me of the end of all quiet on the Western front, which if you haven't seen that the foreign version with subtitles, Man, that's a powerful movie anyway. At the very end, when the Germans show up and they're asking for some stuff, and the Allies, the French and the people that are going to sign the peace agreement there on November eleventh, they're looking like, you're freaking kidding me. We ain't given you nothing. You want to die, you want more of you to die, you want us to take more? Go ahead, or it ends now. I mean, that's why that war ended. They were Germany was so thoroughly defeated they could not fight any longer.
That's how war's end. Well, in one final point.
The only exception of that sort of thing is occasionally if you have a territorial dispute among various ethnic groups.
And they're a long list of them in European history, but all of them, all of them that have gotten settled through negotiation, have resembled so many of the deals. I'm old enough to be able to picture Jimmy Carter with Monoch and began and anwar Sadat there on the south lawn of the White House. Then I'm picturing Bill Clinton with Arafat and was it Bagan again, I can't even remember, it doesn't matter, And the Abrahamccords and everything round after round of all right, here's like everything you wanted, and then the radicals rejected it at the last minute. Why I become completely convinced and please feel free to argue me off at this point if you can, maybe drop us a notemail bag at Armstrong you get it. Dot com Islam considers it an incredible insult and defeat and humiliation that Jews occupy that part of the Middle East. They can't have it, they can't settle with the Jews. That's why this conflict will never end until there is victory or apocalypse or something.
Yeah, yah, sir, I remember talking about this when I was into the Monoca Megan biography as reading Yasir Arafat walked away from one of those deals when he started to announce that the Jews don't actually have any claim on Jerusalem. That's all a lie. All that stuff is a complete lie with Abraham and all that sort of like what they like, nobody knew where that came from, and he just hit that at the end, and that's what blew up the deal.
Yeah, that's the difference. I mean, like us in Canada, I think Minnesota ought to end here. In Manitoba, Metatoba will be on the other side of the line or whatever. I'm not great on Canadian geography. There's no like there's a grievous insult that a Canadian owns any land in North America. That's the difference. It's fundamentalist Islam.
Interesting. Trump out with a new economic proposal, same with Kamala Harris. Maybe we'll talk about that a little bit later, and a number of other things stay with us.
McDonald's just anouns that they're going to start serving mcflury is in a new cardboard cup that has four flaps to cover the top.
Every Chinese takeout restaurant. I was like, Wow, where'd you come up with that idea? I'm confused. The mcfluury is going to be in a in a small cardboard box. Why, I have no idea. It's not a beverage. True comes with the greatest spoon that any fast food place ever gives you. I keep those things and wash them. They're awesome. The mcflury is a good dessert. I had my first one a year ago. That's a flipping good dessert. I'll let you speak to that. I probably never had one. You should try the mcfluory sometime if you're ever going to have a dessert. I'm going to take a populous turn here. I rarely do every now and then I do, but I'm going to hear as I'm usually you know, beating up on the young people or whatever for their attitudes and you know, life is hard and suck it up, and you know, blah blah blah. But this one, gen Z employees are taking more sick days than previous generations. Here's why. I didn't read the article, but.
I was thinking of this week is why next topic.
And I hate that attitude. And as I've said many times over the years, I've never known a successful person who takes all their sick days and spirit days and that sort of stuff. I know lots of people who do it, but I've never known a really successful person that does it. I don't think that's a coincidence. But in terms of the change in the culture, some of it is entitlement, absolutely, I know people like that.
Some of it.
Though, here's my populos turn. You have Christmas parties anymore. They see their friends get marched out to the car with a cardboard box when they get fired, like their criminals having been perfectly nice people. A lot of the stuff that corporations do. Now, eh, that's some of it. That's definitely some of it.
There's no what.
In many situations, there's not a lot going on that would inspire loyalty.
Right, you're gonna use me and throw me away like a kleen X. Well you know what? That goes two ways?
I get that. Yeah, so you know that should be included in this conversation too. Do I agree, like I said, that there's too much entitlement or that if you want to be successful, I would. I'm not gonna. I'm gonna encourage my kids, don't use your sick days unless you're sick, and ignore spirit days and all that crap. Go to work. But again, they've eliminated a lot of the things that used to make people at least semi loyal to their corporation. But depending on your priorities, you can't look at it like what do they deserve?
Ye to look at him? What is best for me?
He's selfish about that sort of thing, and it'll probably lead you to you know, I'm gonna work hard and get ahead. My boss is a jerk, but that's what's best for me.
Armstrong and Getty.
No, but even if you don't like me, you can sit there.
I can't stand that guy, but there's no way I'm going to vote for her.
Now.
You have to have Frackett. You know you're the biggest in the country for this. You have two of the biggest sites in the world. It's a massive business for Pennsylvania, and you can't take a chance. She will not allow Frackett.
Trump yesterday from his town hall with Sean Hannity, he goes on, it's.
Still about the forgotten man and the forgotten woman.
The people are.
Being treated horribly in this country. We're a country that's being left at all over the world. And I'll be honest, if Joe Biden would be a great president, I would be happy than being the worst president in the history of our country, because I want to see what's good for the country.
I think that's an interesting angle he's going with that first clip where he says, I know that you don't like my personality, some of you, but you gotta vote for me. You can't vote for her. Like giving people permission in their own minds to dislike him and yet vote for him. That's a very.
Untrump like tech to take. I'm glad he did. I think he needs to do more of that. Look, I know I.
Can be a little well we talked about this, like every time he's run.
Yeah, just say, look, I know I can be over the top sometimes and then I have a reputation, but I really really want what's best for this country.
Just get sincere for a minute.
If he's capable every time he's run, which is an interesting phrase because he's a nominee for the third time, which is practically unheard of, and it stretches out over a lot of years and is a number of people have pointed out he's been on the national stage now for about a decade and and you know all the gravity that is Donald Trump and the way it pulls our politics and everything like that. But you got, you know, thirty year olds, probably thirty five year olds, depending on when you started paying attention to politics, who have not known politics without Donald Trump being the focus of it. Yeah, and just where we are. I thought this was from the Apprentice, you know, So that's Trump. You know, he's speaking to the fracking crowd. They're in Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania may very well be the entire Bolowax for this election. I mean the math, the way it just works out to get to two seventy. Kamala Harris has almost no chance of being president unless she wins Pennsylvania, so that's why they're all spending so much time there. This is what Kamala said to some steel workers yesterday.
US steel should remain American owned, an American.
Operator crowd scheernet. President Biden has put out a statement saying that he is going to make sure that US steel is not sold to a Japanese company for fourteen point one billion dollars, which is the current offer right now. And I thought this was interesting from the Wall Street Journal. Biden, Harris, Trump, Vance and the dumbest economic idea. A sign of the And this is from the editorial board of the Wall Street Journal. A sign of the rotten political times is that President Biden, Kamala Harris, Donald Trump, and JD. Vance all agree on the dumbest economic idea of the presidential campaign so far, opposing the acquisition of US steel by a Japanese company. And that's a heck of a thing to call it the dumbest economic idea since you got price controls and rent controls, and all kinds of gouging laws, and all kinds of these other different dumb things out there.
It's quite a contest, yeah, for the dumbest idea.
Miss Harris is apparently undaunted by economic illiteracy in all literacy, telling Monday rally in Pittsburgh that US Steel should remain an America owned, American operated in the crowdshared like crazy, and then they go through all the reasons why they think it is a terrible idea. Why is it a terrible idea? May well, there, First of all, this is a beautiful, beautiful, beautiful example of how the at first blush impression of something can be completely wrong. Because if you were to ask me, just on its face, which would you prefer, I'd say, oh, an American company owning US steel, of course. But the reality of it is the other bidder is a union shop Cleveland Cliffs, that wants to create in essence, a domestic cartel with no competition and huge steel tariffs from any imported steel to protect its own union members.
And we saw what.
Forbidding competition did to US automakers in the seventies and eighties. They just got soft and lazy and made crappy, crappy cars. And if Cleveland Cliffs merged with US Steel, they would have one hundred percent of the US blast furnace production, one hundred percent of the domestic steel used an electric motor vehicle, sixty five to ninety percent of other domestic steel used in vehicles, and it would almost certainly drive up prices in a hugely important sector.
Steel goes into everything. And the Japanese company is promising to spend two point seven billion dollars refurbishing the Pittsburgh Steelmakers' aging plants. It's also agreed to honor US Steel's collective bargaining agreements with the United steel Workers. And again, the whole competition argument, that's the main thing the Wall Street Journal argues is that without competition, we all know where things go from there. But what I find interesting about this is how many of those candidates, since they're all in agreement against the Wall Street Journal editorial board, not just like criticizing it, but saying, this is the single dumbest thing that has happened to this presidential election, So how many of them are aware of that? Maybe they're all aware of this, but this is the that was the headline of the op ed our dumbest moment economic you know, populist moment that we're having. Everybody's willing to play that game. Yeah, everybody's willing to say the opposite of what makes sense. Well, I guess if you don't get elected, you don't get to do anything. I think the best.
Example of it, the most clear example, and again I have a great deal of sympathy for the East Side that says, no, we want America to owned US steel. But if you look at the reasons that are holding the deal up, that it's national security grounds and that Japan is not a friend of the US according to the CEO of the other company that's bidding, that's a ludicrous claim.
It's almost hilarious. Anyway, I'm sorry, what was true.
Seventy five years ago? Not true? Now? Yeah?
Yeah, oh oh, that's right now, I remember your question.
A beautiful example of this is the politicians, like in California and elsewhere that continually promised slave reparations. It's ridiculous, it's never going to happen, it's unworkable for half a dozen great reasons, but they keep promising it because they know it will get them votes. Then they get into office and they form commissions and promised to further study the problem, and then say reparations can make take many forms. For instance, these neighborhood grants are reparations in a way, and then they just they forget their own rhetoric.
It's the same thing. Yeah.
JD.
Vance comprehends one hundred percent the reality of the two companies trying to take over the steel and what they did.
But he knows.
If you're trying to explain that to a hard hat wearing American as opposed to US steel should be a US company, you're gonna lose. Right, You heard the crowd cheer there. Yeah, I get it, dang it. Yesterday when we were talking about how price controls poll so well, Yeah, the average person on the street about the government setting prices, most people, the majority of people say it sounds like a great idea. Oh that's troubling. Yeah, yeah, it is is a great peace and bright part. The other day talking about the rent control ideas that Kama has been pitching, which are just idiotic, and they quote a coalition of thirty conservative groups, I mean everybody tho, who's who from well, just all of the think tanks and you know, the lobbiest you've ever heard of, But they wrote quote. Even the socialist Swedish economist as R. Lindbeck once said quote.
In many cases, rent control appears to be the most efficient technique presently known to destroy a.
City except for bombing.
Wow, yeah, that's a socialist one more time.
In many cases, rent control appears to be the most efficient technique presently known to destroy a city except for bombing.
One other well, it polls well, uh yeah, because on the face of it, you did think, yeah, that sounds like a good idea. But as you keep pointing out, you can explain to most people in like five minutes why it's a bad idea, and people say, oh, okay, that makes sense. But yeah, nobody ever gets around to explaining it.
I guess well, they say in politics, if you're explaining, you're losing. Well that's true, so troubling. If that's true, then we're doomed. Uh so I'm not allowed to explain anything. No, okay, well we're done here. Everything has got to be understood at the very first glance without thinking about it for a second.
Oh that's troubling. Oh so I just came up. I just saw this ad on television from Gillette. This is similar to what I was talking about earlier with Target. I'm not comfortable talking about this on the air, Like as in Target and they got all the sex toys there in the aisle next to the vitamins and like down low and I don't know, shouldn't they I don't know. Am I approved? Like if tim shit beaded curtain or an ID or something? Am I wrong about that? I don't know. I can't figure out if I'm wrong about it. That should pleasuring yourself with various vibrating things be your partner, be something you want your six year old to ask about when you're at Target? Or should you put it somewhere.
Where I, as a parent, would appreciate it if it were not so obvious?
Me too, aren't most wouldn't most parents agree with that? They had they had? I mean, I am I'm a grown man. I've been around the world. They had some various devices there. I couldn't figure out what the hell you would do with that thing? Oh yeah, I'd have to read the manual.
Who's that for?
It looked like it was for a couple of gentlemen to enjoy together the way it was designed to me, I think it would have to be a couple of guys would have to I think. But anyway, and then yeah, there's says some air thing that blows air somewhere, and I'm not sure what that did anyway, Yes, Michael.
I'm the fact you're shaking my head. Why know?
But this is a target. I'm not.
Blows air somewhere, right, Yes, Katie, what are we inflating?
Well, it also doesn't help that the packaging looks childlike with all the colors and whatnot, too.
Right, You're right. They could put it in packaging where it's kind of antiseptic, but it's got the title on there. This is a vibrator. But yeah, they make them look like toys. Man, if I'm a seven year old boy, I look at that. Can I have one of those? It looks like a toy and it's in a fun child color. Well, it is a toy, jack, You're right, the new fangled term sex toy. I prefer the more traditional term marital aid for novelty use only anyway, similar to that, do I have time for this? Similar to that? I just saw an ad that I'm uncomfortable talking about on the air. But I saw the ad middle of the day on network television, so it must be okay, Respect your Pubic Region from Gillette, And it's all about the word. What's that. I don't like the word. I don't either. That's why I'm bringing it up middle of the day, giant letters on my TV screen, Respect your pubic region. I don't like that word either. It should be behind it for a euphemism, please, it should be behind a beaded curtain in a bad area of town. Is the only place you should ever see that word, right, And there should be other scary looking guys and trench coats around if you ever even see that word. Not on my television next to you know, Kelly Rippa and her husband or whatever. But it's from Gillette. And it showed some guy just the camera was like down to just almost all the way down, and he had the razor out and he's doing his thing, manscaping. I guess, and I guess that's the point of the whole thing, But I feel I don't. I don't know why that's got to be on in the middle of the day on my regular daytime television show.
It's the coarsening of society on it.
I'd say, it's not like I'm against any of these activities in private.
Against the grooming their nether regions.
I can't remember who said this famously in the I think it was the very early seventy Well, any of it that is sex really dirty, only if you're doing it right, right, was the answer. But I don't need to hear about it. We let's let's keep the more refined parts of our humanity in front of us and leave the more based stuff as delightful as it can be behind closed doors.
Yeah, I'm not trying to be childish about this. I think it's fascinating. Do we think this is enlightened and a step in the right direction to be talking about these things like very very openly in you know, kids, grandma, whoever? Or do we think we had it right before? I'd be interested what you think text line four one five two nine five KFTC four one five two nine five KFTC. You're shaking your head, Katie. You have a vote on this.
I'm just thinking the same people who are behind that ad you're talking about with a guy shaving his noother reason. Regions are probably the same people that want women to stop shaving all together because it's natural.
It's just like they're I don't it's so backwards.
Yeah, that's funny. That is a corporation that I think has been pretty woke. So they're probably anti women doing it but promoting men doing it, Yeah, for some reason. Yeah.
Yeah, Well, I just in answer to your question, there's certainly a broad spectrum of ways to deal with this in a society. Sexual stuff from you know, very Victorian, straight laced, pretending it didn't exist, which is ridiculous, to the you know, pornographic I saw a video the other day of for women twerking and rubbing their privates in a restaurant while chanting in favor of something it was. It was just well it was animalistic, honestly. Somewhere between those, can we compromise.
Yeah, and we need to find a happy medium somewhere. Anyway, I'll be interested in seeing your text more on the way.
Brian Stelter returning to CNN, you know, Brian claimed that getting fired was the best thing that ever happened to He had fun. Fact, after being fired, Stelter said he had moved to.
A horse farm but.
Now that he's finished eating, he's ready to return to work. Stelter will once again publish a reliable Sources newsletter, but also get his own streaming service, CNN Plus Size.
Well, these are just fat jokes, fat jokes. Greg Gutfeld just going after the UNUX fat belly making fat jokes about CNN host Greg Gutfeld on Fox, who regularly gets as good or better ratings than the other big network shows, which is something.
So I thought we had some of the UNUX audio. I'd asked for it. Maybe he didn't.
Back to the decay or not of civilization talking about the sex toy aisle at Target, what we got this text Target sell sex toys. Wait what WTF? That's so wrong for Target. Yeah, I think a lot of you don't know this, but you turn down the aisle looking for vitamins, which I was actually looking for Flintstones vitamins, and right behind me was all these sex toys and like men, not like one or two in a box where you'd have to read the label to know what it was. Big giant pictures displaying what they were. If you're you know, a person of the world, he knew what they were at first glance, and tons of them and all kinds of different lubrications and condoms and vibrating this and grabbing that and blow his air up you For some reason, I don't even know what that toy is.
Again, I'll pass on that one well.
And I was asking is this a good thing? Like? Is this enlightened? Or is this? You know, decay A bunch of texts, but this one, for instance, twenty plus year listener. Love you guys, but even you guys have gotten way courser in the air, so much so that I won't listen with when I drive with my seventeen year old son to work. So maybe we're part of the coursening of society. Jack Walmart by my house keeps jeez, I can't say this word. Oh give me initials BP. If you had a leak, I wonder if you had a leaky south end, you might need a plug to keep it from leaking anymore? Enough, Jack the Walmart by my house keeps BPS at the checkout between the breath mince and the chapstick. I don't know how I know what.
I could use some Altoyd's and a PP.
I don't know if I believe that or not. Many people pointing out that Walmart does the same thing. Yeah, I'm just picking up Target, picking on Target because I shop at Target. But I'm sure Walmart does have the same thing. They're definitely inappropriately targeting children. This is the number one response we got with these items. Putting them down low where kids can see them. They're trying to sexualize children. Blah blah blah, the bright colors, it's hard not to think. I mean, why are they down I mean, you've got them like at child level, eye level height. That's an accident.
Sexualizing children. Part of Neo Marxism is so sickening. Got a great hour Next Hour. If you can't get it, get it via podcast later Armstrong and Getty on demand.
Subscribe, follow us Armstrong and Getty