Well Trained Chilean Ninjas

Published Apr 3, 2024, 5:29 PM

Hour 4 of A&G features...

  • How Israel is handling their televised war...
  • There's no way to avoid our national debt...
  • This...
  • Final Thoughts. 

From the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio at the George Washington Broadcast Center, Jack Armstrong and Joe Getty Armstrong and Getty show.

Israel facing mounting questions over why three clearly marked AID vehicles from the World Central Kitchen were targeted in an IDF air strike, killing seven workers delivering supplies. The AID group says the workers coordinated their movements with the Israeli military and were traveling in a free car convoy in an area deemed safe. The convoy was then struck three times. The World Central Kitchen calling the incident unforgivable and immediately halting operations. Prime Minister Benjamin Etnahoo launching an investigation but saying it was unintentional and that it quote happens during war.

Wow, where was that from? CNN? Is that where that came from her? Israel targeting the AID workers. Okay, well that's specifically true because you know, just shooting bombs different directions. They targeted those people, but they didn't think they were AID workers, is the thing. So that's a little fudgy there. But I don't know, you either believe it was an accident or on purpose. And if it was an accident, then what this is the sort of thing that happens in every war that's ever existed, never will which is horrible. It's absolutely horrible. Remember when we killed all those people in where was that a rack? Where did we go after somebody? And we got this guy just coming home from work bringing water bulls family Afghanistan. God, that was a horrible story. But yeah, it happens, and it's terrible.

Well, and what would Israel gain by doing it intentionally? That's a bizarre notion. Yeah, yeah, this is the first fully televised war. People talk about Vietnam, but that was some journalists in a few places taking film with their cameras. No, this, everybody's got a camera everywhere all the time, and those who seek to influence opinions are well aware of that, and they use that video and audio to influence opinions constantly around the clock.

Right, And people are not sworn to put out their video accurately in any way?

Well, no, And just the horrors of war is something the non warrior has not had to contemplate for virtually all of human history. Even if when the warrior came home injured or changed or affected, that's different than watching it yeah.

I was listened to a podcast yesterday with a guy who he's an expert in urban warfare, but he was talking about various battles in World War Two, for instance, that we fought where we would go into towns and there were combatants mixed in with civilians and lots of civilians got killed because we had to win and we decided that that's what we were going to do. But there weren't, you know, people with cell phones around, and it didn't get posted to Twitter immediately. Uh, yeah, you're exactly right.

And I don't know.

I don't know what's gonna happen here. I don't know how this is going to play out. It would seem that this Rafa battle is going to be, uh maybe a turning point for the history of coverage of war, or people's perceptions of war or something. They're going into that last Hamas stronghold that now has between a million and one point four million Palestinians in Gaza on purpose. Hamas is gonna driven them that direction to try to have as many civilians surrounding them as possible, so that you will have the horror when Israel goes in and tries to clear out those tunnels and kill the last of Hamas, and it's gonna be crazy the way the coverage of that is.

I will say, again, with all due humanitarian respect to Israel's need for restraint and accuracy and not making mistakes like they apparently did. Some of Hamas's best and brightest are in a meeting room right now discuss saying how can we maximize civilian casualties? That is the number one weapon we have in terms of global opinion.

Yeah, the thing you got to understand is when Israel killed those aid workers, Hamas cheered, you know, they did, they thought that was fantastic.

What an ugly situation.

But the biggest protests in Israel since the war began over the last couple of days, three days in a row. Now, tens of thousands of Israelis in the street around Jerusalem protesting. A lot of the families of hostage is demanding a ceasefire, you know, agree to what Hamas wants to. So that's not the majority of the opinion, but it's a lot more than it was a couple of months ago.

Yeah, and I.

Think the hostage families believe and I can't fault them for it. That look, agree to some long ceasefire that's going to benefit Hamas, get everybody home again, and then you can get back to what you're doing, having been delayed somewhat or letting Hamas regroup somewhat. But you got to get the hostages back. And if that's what they feel, I sympathize with them.

I get that.

I think from the perspective of the Israeli leadership, many many, many people are going to die, and the hostages might well be on that list.

And it's grim.

Yeah, and public opinion has dropped quite a bit in the United States too, so in the next couple of weeks it's believed that after Ramadan, Israel is going to go in at that.

Boy, it's gonna be some story to follow anyway.

You know, this is an unnecessarily light metaphor, but I think it illustrates the point I'm trying to make. An avid golfer, though not a good one, And sometimes you find yourself in a situation and you hit it into the woods or whatever where you have only one choice and you can't go for the hero shot. You can't hook it around those trees. No, you have one opening, and that's your only choice. Well, in the midst of all this horror and confusion and israel has I think most Israelis would agree a certain amount of clarity, no matter whether the discussion about casualties or bombs, or strategy or hostages, whether it's long or short, complex or simple, if it ends in and therefore you're just not going to be able to defeat Hamas, that possibility gets rejected.

It has to be rejected.

The only objective or only result that they can possibly consider is Hamas is completely defeated, and that lends a certain amount of clarity, even in the midst of horror.

Yeah, and I keep mentioning this book, but I'll do this quickly. So when began, Prime Minister took out the nuclear reactors in Iraq. That was his decision in eighty one or eighty two. He knew there was going to be tremendous condemnation around the world, including from Ronald Reagan. But his thoughts with his inner circle was better to be condemned and take out that nuclear power plant then not be condemned and have a nuclear power plant where they're making weapons designed to take us out.

So I'm sure that's nothing. Yahoo's calculation.

Also, yeah, yeah, there's a great line in Masters of the Air that absolutely terrific Apple TV series produced by Steven Spielberg and Tomhanks about the aerial warfare and bombers in World War Two. It's really good. But one of the heroes of it is beating himself up because he it was, in his mind, responsible for a friend's death. And this gal he is with who spoiler alert, turns out to be much more than she seems. Well, I guess it didn't spoil.

Anything, says to him.

Your friend died for one reason, because Hitler and his band of goons decided they should rule the world. That's why your friend died. The rest is just details. Yeah, yeah, speaking of clarity, that's pretty good. All this has happened because hamasit tacked on October seventh, mistakes are going to be made, you know, bad decisions might be made.

But that's why all this happened. Don't lose sight of that.

So while we're on this topic, and then maybe we'll take a break in reset, try it, you know, and get our feet back underneath this.

I heard somebody say this yesterday. I thought it was so good.

Why don't we have more politicians either side saying out loud, because what we're up against right now is Iran. That's what Hamasa is at the behest of Iran, Iran, China and Russia trying to eliminate the world order that has existed for eighty years, mostly dominated by the United States. We need Trump and Biden and every presidential candidate and every US send it. Everybody in Macron, everybody in the world needs to say the current world order is better.

Right, The American led world order is better than all the alternatives period.

Yeah, I agree with it, and you need to Both parties need to have to say that the college students and old people and Euros and everyone, the US led world order is better than what they want.

And that's not set out loud enough right now.

I'm not sure either party wants to say loud because it's not America alone enough, and certainly Democrats don't want to hear that because a US led world order sounds kind of I don't know, mean or something, or imperialism or something.

And I was taught that the country was founded on racist right, so that can't be Yeah, you're right, it ought to be an unequivocal statement, and it's so beautifully simple. It doesn't claim we're perfect and everything we do is right. No, but the American led world order is much better than any other alternative. Let's start there. Okay, what would you like to fix? Having agreed upon that, what would you like to fix? More than willing to talk about? Sure?

Up, I don't live long enough to see what a non US led world order looks like, but I may. Anyway, we will recite well, got You've got so many new stories to get to, and we'll do that coming up. Pete Boodajeedge made me so bad yesterday.

Have that for you? Come out many many hours ago.

When the show began, Jack opened with his usual line, life will not be a bore in twenty four or at least you may have and it certainly won't be. I'm not going to belabor any of these points, but they certainly all seem to be pointing toward the world changing rapidly before too long, and we could absolutely dwell on this one. The good folks at Bloomberg, which is a liberal media outlet, conducted a million simulations on the US economy and debt and federal budget, and in eighty eight percent of them, the future was unsustainable. In only twelve percent of the many computer simulations. Did we work our way out of the debt problems without like gigantic changes? And I could get into the technical stuff, but it's not that interesting. But they're talking about the fact that the Congressional Budget Office forecast that the national debt will grow to an astonishing fifty four trillion dollars in the next decade, and that payments on the interest on the debt are expected to triple from nearly four hundred and seventy five billion dollars last year to a studying one point four trillion dollars in twenty thirty two, which is only eight years from now, and then shortly after that, the payment on the interest on the debt will be more than the US spends on Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and all other mandatory and discretionary spending programs.

Am I having trouble imagining what the twelve percent where it does work out? What happened there? The spaceship lands with bars of golder.

I don't know. Corn goes to fifty billion dollars a bushel and we grow a lot of it. I don't know I can't imagine, but anyway, I just and I'm not going to dwell on that. Although I've seen a handful of articles and headlines about the debt and the deficits and spending that went completely out of vogue for a while, partly because you know, Biden doesn't want to talk about it and Trump doesn't want to talk about it. But again, it's not about that. I want to go fairly quickly here. The reason I think this is significant to what I want to talk about next is that as AI changes the world and puts millions of people out of work. And if you don't believe it will I think you're wrong. But that's fine. We in the developed world will have a fair amount of money to deal with it, to hand out at least for a while, so people don't starve the death as their entire industry is eliminated. And I'm talking about you know, legal assistance and insurance, salespeople and white collar workers of all sorts of descriptions. Had an article earlier Wall Street Journal talking about how the big business schools are all saying, look, learn AI. Don't be afraid of it. Learn it because the guy who's good at Ai'll keep his job. The person who's not they'll be victims of AI. I thought this was so interesting. India billion point two people.

Something like that.

I'm rounding to the one hundred million. They have this incredible unemployment problem right now. The more educated you are, the more likely you are to be unemployed. Wow.

Wow has that ever happened before in human history? I doubt it.

They've got a fair amount of manufacturing, construction, road building sort of stuff going on. But if you have a college degree, if you're a white collar person, an engineer, whatever, those people are out of.

Work in droves because.

Just the nature of the economy and they churn out a lot of young, highly educated people and they don't have anything for them to do at this point.

But AI is definitely going to do that. Like we got some texture about guys various jobs saying well, they're not going to be peoble to replace this. So that's going to be a weird situation when when all the people with kind of complicated college degrees, you're an accountant, you're a you're a legal this or that whatever, all taken by AI, and it's the people that I don't know dig holes and fix tractors.

That still have jobs. I don't know what that'll do to society.

Now, is that one job where you dig some holes then fix some tractors.

Or it's one job they dig holes in the morning and then you fix tractors in the afternoon. It's too hot, so you don't get bored.

Oh it gets hot right anyway, two different jobs.

Yeah, I see.

And if you have studied the revolutions of mankind, uh, perhaps you already know where we're going. The idea of droves of educated young people with nothing to do with their skills, perhaps settled with college debt, angry, militant, and smart enough to know what to do about it, that can lend us some fairly serious unrest.

Yeah, revolutions didn't happen with smartphones available, though, So maybe you got a giant chunk of the population that's getting some sort of guaranteed income from the government, and you got a smartphone to a museum, a Netflix password, and uh, you're okay.

And other than Glenn Youngkin in Virginia who just vetoed a bill legalizing recreational marijuana in Virginia, and you've got a hell of a lot of places around America where you can just get high and lay around, play video games, cash your government checks.

Sounds like you're great life. Wow.

So one more semi related thought or a piece of information that kind of flows in a weird way. Wall Street General reports the jobs numbers aren't adding up. US employment figures contain a mystery that's left many economists scratching their heads. How is the country generating so many jobs even while the unemployment rate has drifted upward? Well, the emerging consensus, you're probably way ahead of us already. Hey, he dopes, millions of people have flowed across the border. Yeah, that's it a surgeon. Immigration not only explains inconsistencies in the jobs data, but suggests the economy can keep adding plenty of jobs without overheating. Can I decode that for you as a guy who took lots of economics classes, You can keep adding lots of jobs.

But wait a minute. You have a limited number of workers.

So that will cause wages to rise because all those jobs need people. You'll give them ten dollars an hour, I'll give them twelve, twelve, Hell, I'll pay them fifteen. Well, you import lots and lots of poor people. Illegally across the border. In good news, you keep wages artificially depressed. Now the journal puts it without overheating the economy or causing inflation. That's one way to put it, or keeping everybody's wages good and low, particularly if you are, you know, not a white collar professional.

According to the President's Transportation secretary, if you're not getting into an electric car, you're like people that didn't want to start using cell phones.

What Armstrong and Getty.

If the solar eclipse is less than a week away, it's going to happen here in New York City a Monday afternoon at three twenty five. Yeah, of course, it's important to remember the solar eclipse is like a smiling guy on the subway. It's best not to stare directly at it. I thought that to celebrate the big day, Applebee's is offering the perfect eclipse. Margarita Applebee says it's a great way to blackout during a blackout, which I thought.

So.

This push for electric cars is making people nuts. Most people don't want them. That's been shown by sales which are still tiny even with all the incredible rebates which are going to go away. They just and the brow beating on the manufacturers. Yeah, and all of the media in favor of it. It's still a tiny percentage of cars being sold. So they're shoving carrots down our throats even as.

They beat us with sticks. Confused.

And yesterday bet boot Edge judge who is the Transportation secretary, was on Fox and they were asking about so Tesla posted the first time their sales have gone backwards in four years or something like that, and how there's just non appetite for it, and boota judge actually said this about people not buying electric cars.

Let's be clear that the automotive sector is moving toward easise and we can't pretend otherwise. Sometimes when these debates happen, I feel like it's the early two thousands and I'm talking to some people who I think that we can just have landline phones forever.

That's idiotic.

How nonsensical is that he's a smart guy? Did he actually think that made sense. We weren't forced by the government into cell phones, which we didn't like. We preferred line landlines, but the government made us use cell phones, and some of us stupidly held on to landlines even though the government was forcing us into cell phones for clans. No, we all started using cell phones because we loved him so much, too much, and eventually decided, why am I still paying for a landline? I don't even use it anymore, and we switched over. That's the exact opposite of electric cars. What you're trying to force us.

To do it most people don't want to do at all, because it's less convenient and it's not cheaper.

I tell you what, Pete, what if I were to approach electric vehicles exactly as I approached the whole cell phone landline question in terms of expense, usefulness, reliability, landline as the advantage. Let me add up all the pros and cons and then make an intelligent decision. Uh, that's not what's happening here, not all.

No, Even of the electric cars that we we sell in the United States, that small percentage, most of.

Them, I gotta believe are a gesture.

They're not because it's actually better for you cost a car, ease of charging getting around. Now, it's some sort of gesture toward this is this would be nice for the environment. I gotta believe that's the majority of electric car sales. Don't you think at least you don't know what the number is.

It's absolutely part of the equation, which is yet another non parallel with the whole cell phone landline thing. Right, there's no frantic virtue signaling involved there either.

Wow, what a stupid analogy.

It's like the early two thousands people holding onto their landlines. No, No, not in any way in the least we got this text.

Different topic.

Hi, I'm a forty six year old woman and I live in Sherwood, Oregon, twenty miles outside of Portland.

Oh, but it's really nice in Sherwin.

I was a member of Planet Fitness and was in the women's locker room and noticed a transgender employee in at the same time.

I believe she's referring to a dude was in there. That's a dude is the term of art.

Yes, in the locker room made me very uncomfortable. I emailed corporate told them it was inappropriate for men, even transgender, to share a room where women are undressing. I was basically told I was the problem, and transgender men are welcome to use the women's locker room.

Okay, now I know. There was a bit of a flap.

A couple of weeks ago when Planet Fitness put out a memo to its employees saying, hey, let people use whatever locker room they identify with. Was that an email to us or a tweet or what.

You know, Kadie, Well, there was just there was just a story where a woman was banned by Planet Fitness because she took a photo of a transgender man in the women or a trans whatever wown locker room.

And see how that's I'm sure that is a crime to take a picture of people in there undressed but.

Well fully clothed.

It was just a guy dressed as a chick claiming to be trans in the women's locker room. She took a picture and took it to Planet Fitness and said, wtf is this? And they said, We're going to have to ban you from our gym.

All right? So this is luck with that.

This leads me to this opinion guest day in the New York Times that I found guest Essay, What did I say, Guessa, I'd save time.

The slip of the tom thank you.

The problem with saying sex assigned at birth. There's a lot of interesting stuff in this article. The American Medical Association and the American Psychological Association endorsed the terminology sex assigned.

At birth, which is new. We didn't used to say that, I just used to ask your sex regender. Yeah.

The Cleveland Clinics Online glossary of Diseases and Conditions tells us that the inability to achieve or maintain an erection is a symptom of sexual dysfunction, not in males, but in people assigned male at birth.

It's ridiculous, but go ahead.

This trend began around a decade ago, part of an increasing emphasis in society on emotional comfort and insulation from offense, what some people have called safetyism. Sex is now often seen as a biased or insensitive word because it may fail to reflect how people identify themselves. One reason for the adoption of assigned sex, therefore, is that it supplies respectful euphemisms, softing what to some non binary, transgender people, among others, can feel like a harsh biological reality. A signed female at birth is taken to be an indirect and more polite way of communicating that.

The person is biologically female.

The terminology can also function to signal solidary with trans and non binary people. Obviously, eh point of order, mister chairman, your discomfort with reality is not my problem. As well as conveying the radical idea that our traditional understanding of sex is outdated.

Well right, that's the point of a term like that is to kind of backdoor you into agreeing with radical gender theory in general.

Well, well, I think, well sometimes that's the case. I think a lot of times they're just trying to stay out of trouble. We just need to know if you're a man or a woman. You fill out some paperwork. We're trying to figure out how to word this so we don't get in trouble.

We just want to know if you're.

A man or woman. That's all, were you assigned at birth? See, we're up with the cool thing that you're into. See the way we use the phrase, which are you?

What they want to know? Well said?

The shift to sex assigned at birth may be well intentioned, but it's not progress. We are not against politeness or expressions of solidarity, but sex assigned at birth can confuse people and creates doubt about a biological fact when there shouldn't be any. Nor is the phrase called for because our traditional understanding of sex needs correcting.

It doesn't. This is the New York Times. Again.

This matter is because sex matter. Sex is a fundamental biol logical feature with significant consequences for our species, So there are costs to encouraging misconceptions about it. I read, I listened to a long podcast actually with the Schultzburger Schultzman or the Schultz people that have been run in The New York Times for generations, and.

They are Sultzburgers.

They get a lot of pushback from the trans community for running any articles or opinion pieces that look at the other side of it, the other side being like eighty percent of America that other news organizations don't.

Well, that's because you know, the so called trans community is just the college educated and woke. I'm down with all the radical theory crowd, which includes the vast majority of people who are not quote unquote trans. I mean because that the number of people who are actually suffering from serious gender nice for you is vanishingly small. You've got these sudden onset gender dysphoria adolescent girl crowd, which is a distinctly diff group. Then you've got the folks who just want to be different, say yeah, I'm gender fluid, because that makes you special. It's the narcissism of small distinction. So you take all of those groups together, that's that's still a very small minority of people, but it's a fair number.

Well, in that guessay that I just read from guest essay, I've just made up a word.

If you.

Brought somebody in a time machine, you wouldn't have to go very.

Far back at all.

Ten years would be plenty twenty seventeen.

I mean, you wouldn't have.

To go very far back, and you, you know, brought them forward and handed in this New York Times guest essay, they'd be like, what what are you talking about?

Right?

So, how does anything move with this speed?

Well, I think there ought to be classes taught in the future, whether in political science or whatever. The incredible effectiveness of the radical the critical theory, crowd, their strategy, GEZ, their tactics, their techniques, the specifics of their messages. It's it's an unbelievable case study in propaganda and ideology.

Yeah, it's.

Yeah, for what you just said, what is the next craze that we'll be talking about endlessly in five years that we can't even see on the horizon. Obviously, it's impossible to predict because nobody predicted this.

Well, I think you could. You could, James Lindsay could have. If you're familiar with the critical theory crowd, they have a whole bunch of different, un interrelated things like critical race theory, radical gender theory, queer theory. It's all you know in the same grab bag of lunas.

So you're thinking, like the two plus two equals five could catch on and be like the big thing in a few years.

Yeah, it's a good example.

Yeah, I would have to grab my copy of Cynical Theories, the brilliant book James wrote with Helen Pluckrose to have that full list of the various wackadoodle theories.

But yeah, there's a list.

He has written long pieces explaining why two plus two does not equal five, with tremendous pushback from PhD level academics in mathematics.

Isn't that been there?

Nuts? And all they're arguing is that, how dare you, as the white man, tell other cultures how math works.

It's bizarre? Well, what the ultimate point being? Nothing is? Nothing is true? Yeah?

Exactly, Yeah, or well warned us about that. We can change what it is true exactly, including history. Yeah, fascinating stuff, gives you ultimate power. We'll finish strong.

Next strong sixteen million.

At the peak of the Caitlin Clark Iowa basketball game the other day, by far, the most watched women's basketball game.

Of all time, I was just reading about ends. He stayed on the men's side. Yeah, they're cool. I'm a misogynist, so I'm gonna move quickly to the men's side.

The big fat black guy center. He's very entertaining.

That's that's insensitive on several different levels, some kind of how he builds himself, body shaming him, bringing race into it. Oh, this is this is the ugly set of America folks. Yeah, but they're the odds, the odds, the odds against him and the team being there is like thirty two ninety.

Ninety one or something like. Yeah, yeah, it's astounding.

Oh yeah, and it's just I mean, we could go on and on about the nature of teams and sports and how teams get hot and exceed their expectations blah blah blah. But anyway, I'm gonna watch them and enjoy the final four. I have not watched the gals hair to four. I guess I'll watch the the final game as well, but it's exciting.

So I remember we talked about.

This story in Los Angeles a week or two ago. These Chilean burglary gangs that are exploiting the visa waiver for Chileans to come to the United States as tourists, except they're not coming as tourists. They're coming to rob people's houses. And there's a big flap going on in the Detroit, Michigan area now because there have been a rash of these thefts in some of the like super upscale suburbs of Detroit. I think we all think of Detroit and think downtrodden, you know, shuttered car factories, poorer people in abandoned housing. But you know, it's it's it's made a hell of a comeback as a city. In the suburbs around it, they're like some crazy rich people there. But the Sheriff of Oakland County, Michael Bouchard, says that well trained Chilean ninjas are robbing rich Americans.

Hold on.

Ninja, Well, yeah, I just cloth around their face and the knives and the numbchucks kind of.

And that's for one. I love the phrase well trained Chilean ninjas. It sounds like a Saturday morning cartoon show from back when we were kids.

Well trained Chilean ninjas. Yeah, they have adventures and stuff like that.

I don't know, but I'm looking at a security camera picture of these guys. Yeah, and they are gloved and masked and have specific burglary tools. They work in teams. They're trained. They go about it like they're h I don't know, like the swat team. Everybody knows their jobs. They move quickly, they know what they're looking for, cash, jewelry, super high end person.

They don't look in your sock drawer do thing, because that's where I keep my stuff.

Damn it.

They sussed you out.

But they scout houses, they figure out who's not home. They sweep in, they sweep out, They get all your good stuff, and then lay low till the next night and then rob another, you know, big house.

I guess a quote from the sheriff.

In the last three or four days, we've had a nonumber of super super similar cases. The home is empty, very large upscale homes, the area is backed up to little or no observation from neighborhoods. They swarm over the wall, in the backyard like their ninjas. If you've got a wall, backyard or whatever fence and they just go in and out with military precision.

A ninja also certified ninja.

All the intelligence estimates suggest from Chile, we have one hundred plus burglary teams in operation right now in America, teams of four to six people.

Wow, and they came here illegally.

Uh well, legally they got around that, that's what you said.

They got around some.

Yeah, so that's the Chileans. The Venezuelan's just walked across the border and saying that the Chileans. Why'd you bother with the whole paperwork thing anyway? U. So if this gets any sort of attention, you'd think it would just really fuel the fire of get hold of the immigration system, because this is a facet of the immigration system.

Early.

Sorry Clodn guy, So geez, go ahead, go ahead.

It's a train wrecked Michael, and you're to blame. I'm sorry about that. We're right low on time. Okay, here's your host from final thoughts, Joe Getty.

Let's get a final thought from everybody in the crew, including the fumble finger Michael Angelo.

Michael I'm just scared about AI. I'm sorry.

Maybe this is why I messed up, but I've been thinking about AI all morning and what I'm gonna do to feed myself in about ten years.

Yeah, well, you and every other human in first world countries are going to be having the same thought.

How are you at clambourne over walls and stealing purses?

You could join one of those burglary ninja gangs.

Huh, Katie Green are esteemed to Newswoman as a final thought, Katie.

Well, fine, while fumble fingers is hilarious, I'm gonna defend Michael. That was not his fault. Michael, You're the best. Don't listen to jail.

Well trench of Lily and Ninja.

Final thought for us the idea that AI will be more profound to humanity than fire or electricity.

I mean, I can't even wrap my head around that. Neither can you. By the way, even if you think you can, you can't. My final thought is a shameless plug. Good Armstrong and geddy dot com.

We are featuring our interview with Riley Gaines, the great crusader for women's rights and sports and locker rooms and prisons. Speaking of there, are men and there are women. Let's keep it simple. There are important reasons to do that, but we'll you'll find that at least a little later on today, perhaps at Armstrong and Getty dot com.

Armstrong and Getty wraping up another grueling four hour workday.

Also at that same web location, a web site if you will hot links. Our email address is mail bag at Armstrong and Getty dot com. If there's something we ought to be talking about, send it along. Pick up an A and G T shirt? Would you helps keep everybody on the staff? Hat Sports Spras is endorsed by my daughter.

We have sportspros we're doing. They're super comfortable. See tomorrow. God bless America. Two individuals the committee is particularly concerned about.

I'm Strong and Getty. The key word in that phrase is the work. Historically, that's true with stars and everyone knows that. You know what, I'm not making this up. This is real, absolute it is. So let's go out with a barn.

And each sex is deserving an equal opportunity, privacy and safety.

It's wild that we live in a time where that now requires bravery.

They are very much Armstrong and Getty

Armstrong & Getty On Demand

The official podcast...of the broadcast...of The Armstrong & Getty Show!  Learn more at ArmstrongAn 
Social links
Follow podcast
Recent clips
Browse 7,847 clip(s)