Hour 3 of A&G features...
From the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio at the George Washington Broadcast Center.
Jack Armstrong and Joe Getty Armstrong and Getty show.
Coordination was extraordinary. You had dozens of US and Israeli fighter jets in the air, the US fighters alone shooting down those eighty armed drones with heat seeking missiles. There were refueling tankers in the air, ships at sea launching anti ballistic missiles, all the while tracking more than three hundred drones and missiles launched by Iran and its protzeys. But despite that success, the Pentagon will not be evolved in assisting with any Israeli attack on Iran, not aeriel, refueling nothing.
A senior US official warning.
That Israel is intent on responding, adding that the world may think this is.
Over, it is not. Yeah, that is interesting. Israel is going to respond in the United States being so clear that look, we don't support it. We won't even let you, we won't even help you refuel nothing. You can no support from US on that. I don't I lean toward you gotta respond, and we should help, But I don't know that that's the right answer. Let's hear a little bit from also from AYBC James Longman on how Israel could respond when it does.
This region is bracing for Israel's response. The question is where might they strike and how extensive could it be? Could they strike inside Iran or could they strike in Lebanon and on Iran's most important.
Ally, Hezbola.
Could that be an incursion push Hezbola up away from the border with Israel. What is clear is that all of Iran's proxies in this region have been emboldened.
I don't know about you, but I've heard some pretty convincing arguments on both sides of this. I heard an argument yesterday where I thought, okay, I'm settled on this before I got moved off that position of Iran. It looks like took their best shot and failed miserably. And it was made very very clear, you don't have a chance of taking on Israel and the other countries around and there are.
Other countries, mind the United States, You never mind the United States, and there are other countries that join in immediately.
So forget it, and ya you call it good there. The other argument, obviously, is they're screaming toward a nuclear weapon. They continue to say they're dedicated to the idea of killing you, eliminating you.
You go after them, you punch back, you gotta Yeah, I think there's an assumption that Israel will respond within the length of the American attention span, which is as we know what I have already lost you too slow. Israel will respond away and at a time that is most effective. It could be in five months a cyber attack. They are, to their credit, not a society, intelligence service military that is into knee jerk.
Well so from the experts that I like to listen to, and Mike Lyon said this to yesterday. He laughed at the question of was was Iran actually trying to do any damage or was this just a gesture. See, you know, you can't send this many missiles and drones at the same time trying to confuse radar and everything like that without the intention you're trying to kill a whole bunch of people. That's what they're trying to do. But if that was their best shots, why would Israel not hit them hard, like right now, just bomb the but Jesus out of something and say, really say, don't backing it up with some muscle of that will happen again. Ten times that don't and and what are they gonna do. They just took their best shot at you and failed miserably. I just figured this.
Out for the listening audience. You need to send a fax or something to Joe Biden. He takes faxes. He probably has a fax machine. That's right, I think, and you'll totally get this because you're a math guy. I think what we're doing wrong here is putting parentheses around this incident if you can picture a math equation, and acting as if this is a distinct incident that needs a distinct response. This is part of a very long road, and I think Netanyahu and his war cabinet, with whom he is, at each other's throats from what I understand, but they're they're not bothering to bracket this. They're thinking, Okay, that's yet another sign that we need to achieve X, Y and z whatever they want to achieve. Re Iran might alter the timetable a little bit, but Netanyahu's thinking, all right, we have I have this plan to take their nuclear reactors completely offline, destroy their nuclear infrastructure, kill all their scientists. Whatever that's going to win the day. Long term, guys, do we want to make a big show of this or do we just continue on the road to ultimate victory, And it's entirely possible they'll say no, I tell you what, We're going to let this sleeping dog lie and everybody's going to be running around saying, oh my god, when is Israel?
Why didn't Israel? What's going on with Israel?
And Plan A is going to be rolling along at full speed if you know what I mean.
Right, And there's also the idea that Israel continuing to form alliances with other countries like Saudi Arabia, which makes you more protected exactly. David Ignatius in the Washington Post quoting a senior Israeli official who said, we do not seek to escalate this. We want to contain it, but we cannot let it pass. And that kind of sounds like what I was saying. And I feel like, if you're responding five months though it doesn't have the feeling of it it was because of this, it doesn't need to Maybe that's my premise.
Yeah, it's it's and I don't mean to under estimate or under you know, to take on the enormity of the attack, but it's it's almost like Churchill is not pausing to chuck rocks at every dog that parks. Number one, what are you doing chuck and rocks and dogs in the first place? But Israel is thinking, we have a plan, we know we're doing. We're gonna do it good and hard, and do we want to be distracted by this or change your plan at all because of this?
No, I don't think so, We're good. I can see that it is calculating. I do feel like that's underplaying an attack with hundreds of missiles and drones shot at you from directly from Iran to Jerusalem.
Yeah, an attack, Oh, I know it is.
So.
You had the metaphor the other day, which I really enjoyed. You got your your crazy neighbor who's got a gun and a pit bull and he's a pit bull's bit to some family member I can't remember actly, and then he squeezed off shots at you, and you've got to respond if you have a plan that tomorrow at noon, his house is going to blow up, and you're going to you know, first, you're gonna gas him, put him to sleep, put him in your underground dungeon, blow up his house, and he'll never be seen again. On the face of the earth. You're not gonna say, well, I better punch him a couple of times because he just did this. No, you're gonna wait till tomorrow at noon.
I like the fact that I have a dungeon in this scenario that.
Just pomped into my head. It's a little perverse. I think I may get some counseling.
God, I know. I watched Pulp Fiction the other night for the first time in twenty years. That movie's thirty years old. Came out in ninety four. Shocking. It's only shocking if you're old. U. Yes, but uh it holds up. Man, That is not like it seems. Why was this a big deal? What a freaking fantastic movie. John Travolta is amazing. But anyway, there's some disturbing scenes in that movie. Oh yes, there are. Do you have many of them? Because I hadn't watched it long not even I hadn't watched it in a long long time, and I thought, don't wonder if I could watch this with Sam? No, No, I could not watch this with Sam. You should have asked me. Oh my, he said, wow, not good parenting one word in gimp. They'll just say that word. Yeah, that's that's the reason you can't watch this with your fourteen year old back to Israel if you want them to ever be able to sleep again. Maybe, if you don't care if your kid never is able to sleep again. Wow.
So uh, why don't we just go ahead and roll clip number fifty five? I Isshta Hasny on Special Report last night.
Watch that conversation like Cow Speaker Mike Johnson ignoring Fox's questions about aid for Israel. The Speaker has yet to announce a proposal, but he's getting no shortage of I.
Have to do it now now.
The President, along with leaders Chuck Schumer, Mitch McConnell, and Hakeem Jeffries, all calling on Johnson to take up the ninety five billion dollars Senate past foreign aid package that includes aid for Ukraine and Taiwan.
If House Republicans put the Senate supplemental on the floor, I believe it would pass today, reach the President's desk tonight, and Israel would get the aid it needs by tomorrow.
Well, Biden's now now reminiscent of his don't don't aren't you embarrassed at how everybody always ignores you stop playing that card. But House Speaker Mike Johnson plans to bring separate bills to the House floor, funding Ukraine on one hand, Israel on the other, in Taiwan on the odd third hand, in a maneuver aimed at breaking that month long deadlock over the ninety five billion dollar four in age package that they mentioned.
The Senate passed.
So now the the President oddly has said, if you bring me a separate or Israel funding, I won't sign it.
It's got to be the package.
And number one, I don't understand that politically, and I certainly don't get it constitutionally. Congress writes the law. Chum, you know they'll they'll pass what they pass. If you also want Ukraine funding, then campaign hard for that next.
It's so troubling to me, though, as a guy who believes in democracy, these things are not controversial. Really, Aid for Ukraine overwhelmingly would pass if you could just somehow get it to the floor. It's not even close. It's like two thirds of Congress is going to vote for it.
Right, You've got the ugly tribal politics working against it, your group of Republican rebels who wouldn't vote for it is actually quite small, but they're their majority's even smaller, and so they've got to have Democratic buy in. But the Democrats don't want to give the Republicans a win or help them out if they can possibly avoid it, no matter how high the stakes for humanity, which is, if you're taking the temperature of that am mixing metaphors, if you're trying to get an idea of the depths of amorality in American politics right now, that's a pretty good measure.
I'm trying to find the Marjorie Taylor Green text from the other day, but I can't where she basically said, I'm not for funding more Nazis in Ukraine. She actually referred to the whole thing as like like directly is framed by putin that these are Nazis we're supporting. Yeah, she's a dope or does she believe that? Oh? I think she does, which proves she's a what's the term dope? And everyone knows it.
I mean I agree with her sometimes, but you know, stop clock is right twice a day.
A post that came out yesterday on Twitter. I don't know if it's from the President's office. I don't know if Zelenski said it, or I came from his office. He's got people too to protect Israel, which is not a NATO member. Western countries did not need Article five of the Alliance. The same as possible. In relation to Ukraine, political will is needed, Ukrainian President Zelenski said in his evening address. So he did say it in his address. But so he's making the point that so the world came together all these different countries to protect Israel. It's not because of NATO or anything that it weren't obligated by some treaty. It was just against mad Man government that is on the wrong side of the world. That's a decent argument. Oh, Iran, Russia, and China are together in all this, so the world will gather together and never ending support for Israel against Iran. But Ukraine you're kind of on your own, not exactly sure what the argument is there. Oh and one more thing on MJT. She just another Republican just joined her calling for JT. That's not even close. M MTJ. Marjorie Taylor MTG. There you go, There he goes. There, Marjorie Taylor Green, there you go. It only took me a half an hour. Another Republicans had joined her in calling for the ouster of Speaker Johnson Honky Douck. So good luck with that. Have fun. Democrats announced the other day, and I'm not exactly sure why he who's the leader of Jeffery Jeffreys is the name of the King Jeffers leader of Democrats. He announced, we won't side We're we're not going to try to take the speakership. He said that out loud. I don't know why doing that, said that, we won't, you know, take all of our members plus a couple and try to get a Democrat elected. So he announced that straight out, which protects Johnson to a certain extent. We got more on the way, stay here or on rats.
New York City now plans to deploy rodent birth control that comes in the form of salty pellets, which will hopefully be more effective than their last idea temmy tiny condoms.
I had, Ah, you got a Supreme Court thing you want to talk about coming up? Oh?
Yeah, the Supreme Court has taken up a January sixth case. They could affect hundreds of the prosecutions.
Okay, Katie Kirk on Bill Maher on his Basement show that he does. Explaining the Trump voter in a way that will piss you off. Pissed me off. I had a bad parenting moment yesterday.
Oh you passed on showing your kid's pulp fiction.
Thankfully that it was a good parenting moment. My kids are six and four. My fourteen year old, I'm determined to know. He's not ready for pulp fiction either. I was thirty when I saw it. I wasn't ready for it, exactly. So. He had a soccer game yesterday. Kind I hesitate to say this on the air. He had a soccer game yesterday. They're watching it. Soccer games are very long, oftentimes not a lot of activity. I'm a busy man. I had a few things I had to do on my phone. I wasn't just scrolling crap and a few things. I mean, I was getting some texts about this and that, some things I had to deal with. I missed the one and only goal he married ever score in his life. Oh no, I wasn't looking.
Oh no, in a Little Boy Blue and the Man on the Moon.
When you're coming home, Dad, I don't know when, Oh boy, am I wrong? I'm not wrong, just like you, Dad, HOUCHI. You couldn't have just said you saw it. I did, actually, so that's the other part of this story. I claimed I saw you understand this is being aired right right. So dad of his friend came over and said, hey, Sam got a goal. Awesome, Yeah he did. I said I missed it. He said, oh, don't tell him you missed it.
Oh boy, Well I yeah, this was a weekday.
Correct. Correct, Yeah, you are a busy man. Well do you do you keep your eyes glued to the field for the entire hour and a half?
Yes, every second. Of course I was coaching three quarters of the time. But yeah, I really enjoy watching soccer.
I don't even know what's happening. So they're trying to put the ball in the goal. Let's start there. I get that. I don't know much else, but like with baseball or something like that, you know, you know when they're gonna bat you don't miss him batting. Yeah, that's true. It's an interesting point. I don't know, or maybe I'm just an awful person. Swipe right if your kid scores a goal. Oh and there's been a constant theme for eight years now. Wow, why do so many people support Trump? Well, Katie currc Do you remember her. She used to be the perky little woman on the Today Show back in the day. She was on Bill Maher's show the other day. They're smoking pot and talking. I don't know if she was smoking pot. He was, certainly, but she was America's sweetheart, right. She had an explanation for why people support Trump, and I think you'll love that coming up next segment.
Oh boy, something to look forward to. I really want to get to this Supreme Court January sixth stuff. But did you want to hit a few of those texts that we were talking about during the break?
Yeah, So Marjorie Taylor Green had a tweet over the weekend basically saying she's a no on funding for more Ukraine aid I'm not in favor of supporting Nazis is what she said, which is a ridiculous Kremlin talking point. Don't worry, folks, there's about to be back and forth. So we got a bunch of texts similar to this. You adults could not be more wrong about Ukraine and parroting each other doesn't sound like independent thinking to me. Look up the Asov regiment and we got several texts about the Asov Regiment, and I do, and I assume this is going to make the argument that they.
Are Nazis or something. I don't know what the Azov Regiment is. I haven't taken the time to google it. Well, we talked about it back in the day. But I've been talking about a lot of things. And first of all, friend, it's we're allowed to agree with each other now and again.
And why you're mad?
Oh?
Anyway, Yeah, the asof Battalion let Me is absolutely a far right organization that uses some imagery that's pretty naziish. Here's my question to you, my friend, if say, I don't know, starting in twenty fourteen, the big country next door started gobbling up your land by force, sometimes moving the border in the night, taking town after town, village after village. Let's say if this was the United States, do you think there might be ultra right organizations that rose up and would like shoot guns at those people and try to take their country back. Not only would that happen, a lot of you dudes would be in those organizations.
Excellent point.
Who are now thinking Putin is the defender of Christianity or whatever the hell that the existence of a far right wing of Ukrainian politics, and indeed they're military. These are the guys who de the steelworks at mary Opole, who the bloody, horrible siege that they endured.
It's because they're patriots.
Is some of their political imagery or thinking over the top from my point of view, Yeah, probably so. But yeah, you've got a country that's besieged by its big bully next neighbor. Yes, you're gonna have ultra rightists again, you'd probably be the first in line. So cut it out with your Ukraine is run by Nazis, gesus.
That's interesting. You're absolutely right that would happen.
It's inevitable anyway, Again, explain it to the Jewish Voladimir Zelenski about the Nazis. This is much more important on the domestic front now Here's I have a feeling some of those people writing those same angry emails also or attacks whatever, are also convinced that a lot of the prosecutions of the I'm going to call them trespassers. On January sixth, I'm not talking to anybody who fought a cop.
You fight a cop, you're going to jail. Okay, Well, as you know, listeners, you know I had friends there that day. I was getting text in real time, which was very exciting. On January sixth, met home on the farm and we get a text from uh, oh my god, So and so is there what And they're sending us pictures And they did the thing where they're just part of the crowd. Oh my god, we're walking the capitol and they couldn't believe it was happening. And then as soon as it got crazy, they went back to their hotel and watched the rest on TV. Lots of people like that. She ended up getting arrested. By the way that person that was texting it is.
Precisely where I'm going with this. A lot of folks believe that there has been a miscarriage of justice inequity over prosecution for people who are merely, arguably not even trespassing.
I agree with you one hundred percent.
The violent people, the people who did damage, the people who fought cops whatever, they need to go to jail.
But the innocent about the deuces, people who dropped deuces, that is repugnant and probably a misdemeanor anyway. Moving impressive to have that sort of self control.
All right, I'm trying to get to the Supreme Court ruling, and you want to talk about pooh pooh, you just give me a signal when you're done, and the grown ups will continue to talk.
Anyway, I'd forgotten that people pooped. What do you us desk on her desk?
You know it is, as editorials go, an unmistakable message.
Well do you go in with that idea or did you get there and think you know what I ought to do and then can summon it up? All right, we're moving on now.
So the Supreme Court is taking up a January sixth case that could affect hundreds of popular of prosecutions, many of which are completely unjust in my view. After attending this is a great example. After attending to stop the steel rally near the White House on jan six, twenty one, small town police officer Joseph Fisher and a friend began driving home to central Pennsylvania, then around and went back to Washington after learning their fellow supporters of President Trump were occupying the capital. I don't know why they turned around and went back, but they did. They joined the chaos, and they ultimately spent about four minutes inside the building and looked around.
That's it. Well, that netted.
Fisher seven criminal charges, including a felony count of obstructing an official proceeding.
Wow, I think our friend just got a misdemeanor. But yeah, to wonder how they decided on a case by case basis. But anyway, go on.
So Fisher is pleaded not guilty in his waiting trial. But first he has a date with the Supreme Court Rights the Journal, which on Tuesday will consider his claim that the obstruction of Congress charge is illegitimate. If the court agrees, it could upend hundreds of January six prosecutions, including Trumps.
By the way. At issue is.
Whether prosecutors are allowed to charge the rioters and or trespassers with violating an obstruction statute that was pasted as part of the Sarbaines Oxley Act, which was an on financial scandal law to do with corporate governance and finance. The law imposes up to twenty years in prison for anyone who alters, destroys, or hides a record, document, or other object so that it can't be used in an official proceeding like a court case or congressional investigation. So I'm the CFO of Enron, I think, oh, man, the walls are collapsing. All of our crimes are going to be exposed. I'm just going to burn all the records. That's what I'm going to do, right, That's what this law is meant to deal with that?
And how does that and then get it back to the January sixth people.
Well, the law also applies to anyone who otherwise obstructs, influences, or impedes any official preceding. But the law is written to deal with a wildly different situation, I would say. But the Justice or the Injustice Department has used these statute against more than three hundred people it says engaged in violent conduct during the January sixth riot, although they're.
Definition of who was violent and who was and is overly broad.
Anyway, the Supreme Court is going to take a look at whether you can even charge under that statute, which should be really interesting. I'd love to go on on this topic, but we're short a time, and I wanted to get to a couple of other things fairly briefly that are of a similar tone, and just a quick message to the to new listeners, you're thinking, Wow, these guys just they seem to be like in favor of something that's kind of trumpy. And then they were against something that I hear big Trump fans saying, and now they're saying something sympathetic. Yeah, we call them as we see them. Our tribe is conservative and American patriots. And if you want all one and none of the other, we're always right right, right, right right. The other side's always wrong, wrong, wrong, whatever you perceive the other side to be, you're not gonna get it.
Okay, it's not what we do. But here's an example.
Here's a far left extremist trans identifying female who pleaded guilty to attacking physically violently a pregnancy resource center in Ohio in violation of the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act.
Now, this is a progressive transgender.
Weirdo of some sort or another who has gotten only two years of probation and a small fine for doing what she did. Then you had the conservative man who prayed outside an abortion clinic and was accused of blocking it sentenced to harden Wow, because he pleaded guilty.
That's pretty outrageous.
Again, I'll keep this around, we can get into the details of it. It's wildly outrageous.
And then this, which I've been wanting to get so like you're using the legal term weirdo.
Yeah, well I almost went to law school and then this, this is getting zero coverage, which you know, do we need to remake the case that the mainstream media is wildly biased and utterly honest?
I don't think so. But this is such an interesting story.
The House Oversight Committee is subpoena in various Justice Apartment officials about the Hunter Biden sweetheart plea deal, the allowing of the Statute of Limitations to lapse, all of that unholy, obviously mobbed up mess that. Remember the plea deal that the judge said, wait a minute, Wait a minute, wait a minute, do I understand this plea deal?
What is this?
Have you ever cut a plea deal like this before? And it all blew up in public? You remember that? Well, the Oversight Committee wants to know what happened at the Justice Department. How did that unholy, mobbed up plea deal get started, who is involved in it, who made the decision? And they're subpoenaing people to show up. Those people are stonewalling. They're not showing up. They're defying the subpoenas. The DOJ is defying congressional subpoenas. So the US District judge, whose name is Annas is slamming the DOJ for stonewalling Congress while they imprisoned, for instance, Peter Navarro for doing Trump advisor Peter Navarro for doing the very same thing, and one or two other people too. And I have the list of names here, but so, and this is actually Jonathan Turley writing about this. The only way for the House to investigate such corrupt special dealings is to interview the principal actors, including two attorneys from the DJ that they want to talk to. Otherwise, as Democratic members have done, critics can exist insist they've no direct evidence a wrongdoing. So the judge noted the obvious, Uh, there's a person in jail right now because you all brought a criminal lawsuit against him because he did not appear for a House subpoena. The DOJ demanded six months in prison for Peter Navarro. He's serving currently a four month sentence. Former Trump advisor Steve Vannon also received a four month sentence for defying a House subpoena.
The judge noted, it's quite I think it's quite rich.
You guys pursue criminal investigations and put people in jail for not showing up, and now you guys are flouting those subpoenas and you don't have to show up. Ray Has went on to note that the DOJ lawyers quote, are making a bunch of arguments that you would never accept from any other litigant. I imagine that there are hundreds, if not thousands of defense attorneys who would be happy to hear that. DOJ's position is if you don't agree with a subpoena, if you believe it's unconstitutional or unlawful, unlawful, you can just unilaterally not show up. Right, And she lectured the DOJ and when the lawyer said, oh, she said, all right, would you drop your opposition if they're allowed to have DOJ lawyers in the room for the questioning. And the lawyer said, well, we can't answer that question at this time. The judge said, are you kidding me? She is blasting the Department of Justice in open court for hypocrisy.
It's getting no coverage.
God, I'd say it's getting no coverage. Is the first I've heard about it? Yeah, I know it, I know it, and I'm taking a lot of news. Yeah, I know, Well, thanks for listening. We try to bring you those stories.
The Atlantic has got a piece called in the Atlantic Leans Left what the upper middle class left doesn't get about inflation that I can hit you with a little bit of I think you like that is just flat out true, among other stuff on the way, stay here live from CBS bool this is your news now. So what was that that was Sunday night? Now, this is mostly an East coast thing Billy Joel was doing is one hundredth sold out Madison Square Garden concert, which is a record and I understand from listening to various people who have gone that it is quite the event. It's packed every single night. He sings all the songs everybody knows, everybody sings along, has a great time. Anyway, CBS actually decided to air live the one hundredth concert and then he gets to his biggest hit that people like to sing along to the most, and everybody's watching on TV. And because of the Masters or something, I don't know, he delayed the concert or whatever. Anyway, right getting to the hot part of the song, they cut it off and go to local news and a lot of people were outraged and the way people get outraged about things that don't really matter. And now CBS has announced they're going to rerun the whole thing on Friday night. There you go, and everybody's happy. If you're sitting at the bar and putting bread in his jar. Here's what it would have sounded like if you heard the whole thing, a little bit of it.
It's good that the drummer kept timing, because you cannot trust a crowd to keep accurate time.
It's a good decision. So Billy Joe is seventy four years old, holy cow, and maybe more popular than he's ever been. I can't imagine what it feels like to have a packed Madison Square Garden, the most famous arena on earth, singing your words back to you that you wrote fifty years ago, with that much enthusiasm. That's gonna be. How do you keep your ego in check or not thinking? Will? I am pretty? I am pretty damned wonderful. That's one thing I know from experience. I am wonderful. Well, don't ask Billy Joel how to keep your ego in shack. He well, he might have figured it out by now, but you had to be a big shot, didn't you. Yeah, nice job, CBS. So that part that everybody was watching for you kind of now in local news, potholes got filled in Jones Street, right, So Joe said in the little thing during the commercial break that what did you say about the Oh.
Yeah, I was swipeding emails, and I'm like, no, I'm not reviewing the hotel.
I just stayed in.
Somebody else can it was fine with the floor creek, the little who cares?
I don't have time for that, all right, and I never do either. How was your experience at the Witchita? Sheare it? And I don't ever. But the people that do then mislead us all when we want to stay somewhere because everything always because I was doing this yesterday look in the little family vacation, trying to figure out some place to say, and they're either five stars, greatest place I ever stayed, but you know the maids came in and give me foot massages in the morning and put the strawberries on my pillow, or it's you know, there are rats in my food and a guy broke in and attacked me in the night, And just so it's either five stars or zero stars for every place you ever stay.
Right, I was gonna call it the five star one star phenomenon. Yeah, and then it averages out to a four point three, like every product and hotel on Earth averages out to a four point three because you got eighty percent five stars. Then one guy who tripped on a doorway cracked his head open, and you'll never be the same.
He gives it one star. I wish I could give it zero stars. Restaurants the same way, literally back to back, best meal of my life, we'll be back soon, and worst restaurant I've ever eaten at asked for my money back. What am I supposed to do as a consumer with that information? Yeah, and people are so much more likely to fill those out if you had a negative experience. If I have a really bad experience, I will take the time to fill it out. But if it was perfectly okay and worth what I paid for it probably not.
Yeah, getting back to the idea that every American should be forced this is probably not entirely constitutional to work three months in retail than three months in food service, and everybody would calm the heck down a little bit. It's not as easy. It's harder than it looks.
You don't bowl a three hundred every time. Definitely thrive, armstrong, and getty