Hour 4 of A&G features...
From the Abraham Lincoln Radio studio at the George Washington Broadcast Center, Jack Armstrong and Shoe Getty. Armstrong and Getty show.
The defense today likely to try and portray miss Daniels though as an extortionist who was seeking a payday from Trump. This morning, they had a cydebar with the judge. They objected to the prosecutors wanting to bring in details about her allegedly having sex with Trump, but Judge Murshan said some of those details will be allowed in so the jury we'll hear supposedly about the alleged sex act.
I will allow some of the details, but only the sexiest ones.
So it just ruled.
Yeah, So it turns out there's been a lot more details than we are expecting. What is the latest reporting from people that are in the courtroom there, Katie Green?
And then before you jump in, Katie, I will explain why this is such a good thing for Trump.
Okay, So Stormy Daniels had sex with her was a good or you mean they legally speak well, I'd have to ask him about the first part legally and politically.
Okay, back to you, Katie.
Stormy Daniels described herself as being traumatized by the encounter.
She was shaking and bewildered and wondering how she.
Got into the place of having sex with Trump, But she says.
She I can help you with that.
He's a he's a guy. He met you, and you talked about your porn career, and he invited you up to his hotel room and you went.
That's how he ended up in a position of having sexual democrats.
Step one, she says she didn't say no because I didn't say anything at all.
Stormy Daniels continues.
To walk the prosecutors through the encounter. She says, Trump didn't wear a condom. Did you say anything about it? The prosecutor asks no, because I didn't say anything at all.
Why there are two choices here? Wear a condom or don't wear a condom? No? No, not that either.
She is testifying truthfully and had the sexual savvy of a blushing, naive virgin, right, and we'll put aside how hilarious that claim is. Or she's trying to portray herself that way for a reason. What could the reason conceivably be. I don't know.
I was just reading a little bit about her background. She started as a stripper at age twenty one, then moved to LA and started in adult films at twenty.
Three, and she is in many, many, many dozens of films.
So the idea, and I mean just being in show business in general, let alone a porn star. And again not claim She's not claiming at all that this is not consensual. So this is not like a Harvey Weinstein Weinstein thing where you know, you could be on her side for a variety of reasons. She's saying it was consensual. So some rich guy invites you up to his hotel suite and he's in his pajamas when you get there, come on, and.
Then he's in his underpants when you come out of the the.
Bathroom with your background.
No, no, don't try to go through that like you had no idea that that's what was on his mind, and you just you went into a you know, a state of the vapors at that moment.
And okay, yeah, because as Katie told us earlier, she came out of the bathroom and was so freaked out to see him like ready for sex. She her she lost the circulation where heads and her feets and she kind of blacked out.
He had completely misread her intentions. All right, and she's.
Saying now, while she didn't object in the moment, she also didn't enjoy it and felt that there was a quote imbalance in the power dynamic.
There you go, there you go. This is ludicrous. And the judge just scolded her for going off topic. So all what topic did she go on? To car repair flat Mike Glandulo with the staff joke joke of the day. Everybody, congratulations, we have.
I don't know.
We told her to just answer the questions. Wow.
So so going back to what we discussed earlier. Uh, they asked her, so did you have sex? And she said, yeah, we started in the buying position.
Then missionary, she said, according to the New York Post, okay, and the judges, well, whoa, whoa, whoa whoa? Or the defense I guess somebody defense jumped in.
And said, hey, we object, and the judge says, yeah, we don't need to hear that.
Also, Trump apparently called her, honey bunch, this is so tawdry and idiotic.
My IQ was dropping every fifteen seconds of this, apparently, according to the New York Post, At one point every fifteen seconds.
Apparent according to New York Post.
At some point, so Donald Trump welcomed her to his luxurious hotel suite wearing Hugh Heffner's style silker satin pajamas. Again, the old guy who invited to his room answers the door in silk pajamas, and then later you're shocked that he's got sex on his band.
Oh my lord, this realizes you.
Oh lord, this sounds like it could be a start to a porn movie.
She would write, right, because she wrote and directed them.
My excellent point, Katie, Yeah, just a porn star writing and directing.
It's only misogyny that makes you call her porn star. Film director stormat Aaniels.
Well, I don't know she was involved in the lighting and the sound also, or the sounds.
They called her the Scorsese of threesomes.
Anyway, So he answers the door in silker satin pajamas, she said. She immediately made fun of Trump. Does mister Hefner know you stole his pajamas, she recalled, telling him it was a reference to Hugh Heffner's top typical pajamas.
Blah blah blah.
I told him to change. He obliged, very politely. Trump then came back into the room wearing a button down shirt and pants.
That's interesting. So she told him to change out of the room.
Out of his pechas, because then nobody has sex after wearing a shirt and pants.
What. Yeah, I don't know.
This is nonsense. I mean, this whole trial's inn inbsinity. But what else, Katie, this is. It's astonishingly dumb, all of it.
I mean, they're taking note that Trump. He's closed his eyes a couple of times, but he has been noticeably awake throughout this portion.
Of the trial. She somehow aroused his attention.
Yeah, so he started chatting her up on the golf course. She was at one of the holes. I'm sorry about that, both the bonus hole. God, dang it, how do I know that's what they're called.
You know which hole was she at?
Anyway, So she was one of the hotties you have at golf tournaments, you know, you get off the green, and then she was there serving drinks or whatever, and chatted her up.
That's how the whole thing started. I have been part of that tawdry scene and cringe.
His various golf buddies flirted like crazy with the young hotty, which I find humiliating.
I do too.
I'm surprised that how many guys like get some enjoyment out of that. I do not want to walk away from any encounter with a woman where they're just like, ugh, what a creep.
I don't want that much a million years old guy. That's what they're doing. That's humiliating. Yeah, it really is. Anyway, what was I gonna mention?
Oh?
Yeah, so she did blurt out. And I know a lot of you don't want to hear any of this stuff, although some of you do. He had asked her about She had asked him about Milania. He started showing her pictures for some reasons. I don't know what that was about. He showed me a few pictures and things, and I said, oh, what about your wife? He said, don't worry about that. We don't even sleep in the same room anymore. And then he went on to compare her to his daughter at Vanka.
Oh, calling doctor Freud, calling doctor Freud. And then, shockingly, I'm sure we're getting there. He suggested they had sex, and she that's when she got the vapors or something.
Don't worry about my wife.
We were not really together anymore, having invited you to my hotel room.
Right, yeah, okay, so yeah, the guy's in soilk pajamas explaining how his wife is not really a relationship anymore. You're in his hotel room, and then you're shocked to find out that he has sex on his mind.
I would hope the jury is taking all this in and thinking, you're insulting my meager intelligence.
Here a sweetheart, Well, what does this got to do with anything? I would be thinking as a.
Dry As the CNN gal pointed out, we're thirteen days in.
They haven't connected any of this to an actual crime.
Stormy Daniels testified that she had sex with Donald Trump on the hotel bed. Daniel said they were having sex in the missionary position before an objection was raised, and the judge sustained the objection because how in the hell could that be more irrelevant to anything than I mean, you'd be a hard press to come up with the more irrelevant detail than.
What position you were in. Having said, if.
It were in any way relevant to the case, the actual case that's being tried, you could say you asked for details to flesh it out. Pardon me to give the jury a better sense of whether she's telling the truth or not. As you get into details, you could make that argument, but it's entirely irrelevant to whether federal I'm sorry, federal campaign finance rules were bent by a local financial filing, therefore break in the state law against election fraud or something like that.
Oh, now she's testifying. I was just looking at this, Katie.
Don't know if you've seen this about how she Then afterwards the next year, she went to Trump Tower once and it was a very rushed meeting, and he said, yeah, yeah, yeah, I'm working on the apprentice thing, and didn't seem like to be as interested as she was hoping.
Well, have our people call your agent again.
Another thing that's got to be shocking is someone who had been in show business. You mean, he misled you about the project that you might be in, and then it turns out you're not going to be on the Apprentice, even though he had sex with him.
Again, shocking, shocking stuff.
She met again with them at a party at Vodka party in two thousand and seven. I wanted to maintain that sort of relationship with them for the chance to be on the Apprentice that was still up in the air.
It would have been a great thing.
Well, like her legs, it was up in the air. Although wow, there was zero chance it was gonna happen.
Wow.
Well, you know, we're criticizing her a lot, but in her defense, she is a generous and imaginative lover.
She said it was very brief and unenjoyable. Oh, I'm sorry to hear that. This is one of the low moments in American history, Tiz, Liz.
I'm looking forward to how the media covers it, particularly like your serious you know, like ABC Evening News.
How are they're going to cover that? Or MSNBC what are they going to see their wall to wall on it? Right now?
But show man, all right, Katie, if anything else interesting comes.
Up, and look, just friends.
Well, I guess we've said how stupid it is many times, but it's just it's it's so stupid, it's almost spectacular. Why are you talking about it? Because it's just so incredibly stupid. It's hard to believe this is happening in the midst of the first ever trial of an ex president, clearly trying to railroad him off of the CA and Payne Trail. This is something that I'll tell my grandchildren about it.
Yeah. Again, I look forward to the coverage throughout the day. How they handle this yeesh.
So earlier Katie brought us some fantastic audio of a California assemblyman grilling a Newsome administration official on whether the billions of dollars poured into the so called homeless programs are doing any good?
How much does the government care about where your tax money goes? That's a good one. Stay tuned, arm this is extraordinary what you're about to hear. You'd like to believe for sure here is naive as Stormy Daniels is pretending to be today. If you believe the government really cares about your tax money and how it's spent, but you'd sure like to believe it does a better job than you're about to hear. What they're doing with all the homeless money in California.
Government spending is to get votes, period in line.
So I remember when this story broke a while back, but they did some sort of digging into where they billions of dollars in spending money on trying to deal with all the street people in California, where the billions of dollars have gone and hasn't done any good, and then the people got the.
Money, couldn't could didn't have an answer. We don't know. We haven't been keeping track of that, you know.
I want to give credit where it's due. Give me just a second of finished type in this out.
And I would assume, like I fully believe this is true with many many government programs at state, local, and federal levels that if you were to ask where'd the money go and did it do any good? Especially that did it do any good part, they'd say, we don't really.
Have a way to measure that.
I apologize. He's such a great dude, and his name is flitted out of my head. The assemblyman who uh some who demanded an audit.
But we'll play this for you.
This is the grilling that happened yesterday, Assemblyman Phil Ting grilling a Gavin Newsom administrator on where the homeless data is. We've given you plenty of time because this story broke. I remember a couple of months ago, come up with the how much money has been spent? How and did it do any good? And they're supposed to show up yesterday with the info and ears how it went.
Do we have anything from twenty twenty two.
Well again, I apologies.
Why is it taking so long? I mean you you're the one that said you're urgent.
I don't know.
Maybe my sense of urgency is different from your sur urgency.
We're working expeditiously.
What does that mean?
Though we're very short order will have the what a short order mean?
We're working in the next several weeks to have a half annual report produced.
So I mean you're coming to hearing today and you have you can't tell us how many you know, we spend billions of dollars and you can't tell us at all how many people we've helped.
Apologies, I don't have the information in front of me to share you have any office again, were working through data quality issues in order to finalize the report.
If you're going to spend billions of dollars on something, you should be able to update people any moment of any day of any week on how it's going.
The data quality issue is they don't have any data because they don't care. They haven't even asked the question whether this crap is effective, much less gathered the answer and documented it well.
In a lot of these problems, there's no way to measure whether it's doing any good, which to me as a fiscal conservative, means then don't spend the money if there's no way to make sure if it's doing any good.
And I have a very strong feeling Gavin Newsom and his band of thieves ran the brightest female they could up there to defend, to run interference essentially with the questioning, because you can beat the hell out of a dude verbally in a hearing in a way you can't get away with with a woman, which is fine, but so they just had their smartest woman get up there and say things like, well, we're working on that, We're working diligently. We've had concerns about data fidelity. We'll work on that for you until Phil Ting, God bless him, Phil, here's to you, buddy, just had to give up. He ran out of time. Obscene billions and billions. Even the AP which is a liberal news outlet, more than a month ago, how effective our California's homelessness programs audit fine state has not been keeping track. Not only do they not have the answer, they didn't ask the question. Billions and billions and billions of dollars.
So California's ended up with by some people's counting half the homeless people in the entire country or in California, spending all these billions of dollars, and no, we didn't think about keeping track of if it's making things better or worse by spending all these billions of dollars.
And I retweeted some excellent videos yesterday from San Francisco of people who have zero interest in getting straight, finding a house.
They like being junkies, armstrong and getty.
Our Constitution is much more important than jail.
It's not even close.
I'll do that sacrifice sitting day.
So that was Trump yesterday. So he got another violation of the gag order thing. I think this is the tenth one of the thousand dollars fine. The judge figured out that finding a billion dollar billionaire one thousand dollars at a time is not having any effect and threaten Trump that hey, if this happens again, I might have to put you in jail. So Trump responds to that in the hallway afterwards, saying, and the Constitution is more important than jail time. I'm willing to sacrifice for the Constitution, trying to set himself up.
As a that guy. Yep, simple and brilliant, and we got this text.
It is probably true if you've been following, We've been updating you about the Stormy Daniel's testimony all day long.
Which has got to have Trump riled up.
And if somebody texted as soon as today's trial is over, Trump is absolutely going.
To violate the gag order.
I mean, he's gonna be so fired up coming out of that courtroom today. He almost certainly is going to say something that violates the gag.
No, no, no, no, You've got to say something about the trial in general and impuging the judge, because that will be reported over and over and over again in news reports. Not saying I can't believe that fat old skink came in here and lied.
I mean, that's not good strategy.
But don't you think that's probably pretty good guess. I mean, he's got to be fired wrong. So that'll be fun when he comes out of the courtroom today to see what he says.
Wow. You know what I never got to was the bottom line after we were talking about all the tawdry testimony from Stormy Daniels, was that all of this about what sex position and her pretending to be a blushing virgin and shocked that, oh he invited me up to his hotel room to have sex. Oh my lord, I'm going to pass out. I mean, just just beggars belief. All of it adds to making this trial seem like a ridiculous railroading.
I think you.
Know what's interesting about this because I've known some guys like Trump with that attitude.
Rewomen.
He loves people knowing that hot young Stormy Daniels had sex with him. He's not embarrassed about it, right, he loves everybody knowing that.
Yeah.
Yeah, So I guess we'll see about the whole gag order thing. Whole thing makes me gag. This was so good and so rare. We'll just run through some of these clips from Special Report with Brett bhar talking about the third rail of American politics.
It's even worse.
It's like they've called social security the third rail of American politics. Since there's a little kid, and I had to ask somebody, since I didn't grow up in a big city, what's the third rail mean? Now, it's like the third rail plus a poison gas gets released talking about reigning in Social Security or doing something to finance it.
We'll start with fifty. Michael, what's the bottom line headline of this report.
Yeah, the bottom line, unfortunately, is the same bottom line that they have every year, which is our two biggest government programs, Social Security and medicare the thing that seniors that matters to seniors the most, are both headed towards insolvency.
She he is talking to Maya mcguineas who you're listening to right now. Let her go on, Michael.
Yeah, if you really scratch below the surface and look hard, you can find some good news, which is the economy's doing a little bit better, Disability.
Take up is a little bit lower.
But there is a big picture issue here that has been here not for years, but decades, and that is we know the trust funds don't have enough money to pay the benefits that have been promised, and that means when they run out in less than a decade. For Social Security, if you are newly retired in soci Security, I'm talking about when you're seventy one years old, there are going to be across the board benefit cuts of above twenty percent.
That's terrible.
I mean, it's really unimaginable that nobody's doing anything to fix these programs.
And then Brett bhar gets into the fact that it is the third rail of American politics, which, if you don't know, is the rail through which electricity runs to power subway cars in that sort of thing, and if you touch it, you will instantly be a dead person. Here are examples of Biden and Trump addressing the fact that social Security is going broke.
Many my friends on the other side of all, I want to put social Security on the chopping block.
If anyone here.
Tries it cuts SoCal security, Medicare, or raise the retirement age, I will stop you.
First of all, there is a lot you can do in terms of entitlements, in terms of cutting and in terms of also the left and the bad management of entitlements, tremendous bad management of entitlements. There's tremendous amounts of things and numbers of things you can do.
Biden's full of crap, because that's the whole.
If you dare to say, hey, we need to work on this, You're gonna starve bolsters to death.
No one.
You got to remember that was from the State of the Union dress. Then Republicans stood up and shouted.
No, don't you dare say we're trying.
To cut these programs because we're not glad to And then they are both on the record is nobody's gonna touch this.
Stuff right, and Trump's was full of crap too, a little less so, but there's no way you can make up for the declining ratio of young workers to old people in this country by just cutting waste, fraud, and abuse. I would love to see that happen. I love the idea, but it's not nearly enough. May rolls on.
So this is both parties trying to outdo each other with promises of what they will not do to fix the system. And that's the opposite of what they should be saying. First, it's dishonest voters and particularly to seniors. And second it's sort of government no longer functioning. And instead of saying, hey, we have a program that has over promised because we're living longer, there's nothing that's bad about this situation. Is reflects that we're living longer, but that means you have to make changes to the program.
And then the final indictment.
Politicians aren't willing to talk about anything hard because it's always a death match between the two parties. We need to be honest with people, because the longer we wait, the more difficult those changes will be. Particularly because nobody's going to touch benefits for existing seniors. They'll be protective. So so much of this is going to fall in younger workers.
And I've told this story before, but reading the great Robert Carroll books about Lyndon Johnson's life, there was a section in there about Congress and spending in this late fifties early sixties, but there was an agreement by the gatekeepers in both parties and the committees that could allow any of the big bills to go through. Republicans and Democrats believed it was moral to spend more than you take in and to pass along debt, and they were hardcore, both the senior leadership people in both parties that that is not something we can do as a nation. How do we go in a half a century from both parties agreeing it's absolutely a moral which it is. And even if you don't think it's immoral or don't believe in morality, it's just suicide through reality. Yes, sooner or later we'll come back and bite you in the ass. That's not a moral judgment. That's reality. So now there's neither party has it's a race to see who's going to more forcefully stand up.
And say not a chance we're ever going to.
Look at doing anything about Social Security, which is weird.
So the day after I see that fabulous report on Fox News, I come across this story in the Wall Street Journal.
Social Security funds are running dry. Don't panic.
Congress faces tough decisions about the program's finances, But there may be an easier political path, and that is essentially relabeling or mislabeling various uses of government funds and or borrowing it, running up the debt even more. That's the quote unquote easier politically solution.
Well, it is easier politically, it just doesn't pencil out can very long.
I can't imagine that level of immorality and dishonesty. I guess I need to work on my imagination. Stupid imagination. You're not even trying. So I love this. What are the trust funds and how do they work? And they mention that, and this is worth hearing. It's a little dry, but you'll get a great idea of what's happening here. So for decades after Congress overhauled the program in nineteen eighty three. Back when our system works, social Security took in more money than it spent on benefits, and that accumulated in the trust funds. But the trust funds didn't set there. There was no luckbox. As Al Gore put it right, which was actually a decent eye. He said, we can't be spending this money. It's not four other things. Instead, Social Security technically lent it back to the rest of the US government, which then used it for anything from funding military operations to paying back bondholders of other debt.
Yeah, that makes sense that that's where you do it, accounting wise.
In return for the cash, the government gave the trust fund special IOUs treasury bonds that can't be traded but are secured by the full faith and credit of the US. These bonds generate interests supplementing the income social Security now nets from the payroll tax, which is split between you and your employer.
Did you know that?
Yes, to many economists, one part of the US government lending to another part of the US government at high interest rates, I'm injecting that part is anomalous. Many of them disregard blah blah blah blah blah when they consider the overall Oh, they disregard inter governmental debt when they consider the overall US debt burden. So the US government, oh wow, is ohs billions and billions, if not trillions of times trillion to the US government.
We have the interest and that doesn't count on the thirty four trillion that we're exact. I didn't know that, correct, Wow, that's interesting. So that would be like if I was taking money out of my kid's college fund for vacations or whatever.
Right, family ran that out of there.
But agreeing to pay it back at ten percent interest.
But when I talk about like how you myself, but when I talk about my net worth, right, I don't factor in that I need to pay that back.
Correct.
I'm sitting here thinking if I had a friend describe how he was getting by with his wild overspending, and he described a scheme that seemed sounded like that, I would go back home and say to Judy boys, John Aft, he is completely aft.
Better analogy would be like if you're taking it out of your four to one K, so instead of an interest rate, it would be the penalties you pay on having to take it out early, and you're telling yourself or other people or your wife or whatever, right, well, we're gonna we'll put I'll put the money back in the four on one go.
Oh yeah, when I pay it back with interest, we'll have more than enough money to retire on.
But how is that ever going to happen? Because you already don't have enough income to cover your.
Current bills and to get to finish the accounting thing is you're still counting that Fourah one.
K in your net worth even though you spent it. Yes, that is wild.
I mean you'd have to be a really idiotic or devious person to do that.
I despise communism, China totalitarianism, But when Shijin Ping says that system doesn't work anymore about us, he has a point.
You could make the argument that people can't govern themselves, at least not for very long.
Until they can vote themselves money from the treasury as the old sagos. Yeah, does anybody have a counter argument?
Are we missing something that people can govern themselves not for very long? It's entirely possible.
Every system has a shelf life, especially in the hyper fast change of the twenty first century, and that it needs to be torn down and reinvented. Unfortunately, that sentence which I uttered in what two and a half seconds, Sometimes that takes one hundred years.
Yeah, Well, of people fighting and dying.
The people have to say either moral or civic minded, depending on how you want to look at it.
Oh for two.
And I don't want to always bring it back to you know, the going away from God and the church or whatever. But it was actually, according to the Robert Carroll book, they saw it as a moral issue as church going men. Yeah, to not spend more than they took in. So that's what drove them. So even if it's not religious, if it's just civic minded in that, well, we can't put this on a grandkids, because then how are they going to.
Get out of it? Yeah?
I would hope you didn't need religion to do something that incredibly immoral, But I don't know what to say.
Imagine like actually saddling your kids, your own kids with debt. So when you get out of college, Hey, I spend all my money. Well some people actually do that, but you're gonna have to pay my rent and my car payment because I spend all my money in Yeah, knowingly doing that, you can't make them. If I were them in that situation, I'd say that's your fault.
Sorry, dad.
Yeah, But if it's us taxpayers, there's saying that you got to pay it back.
Right, That's a heck, that's a sticky wicket right there.
It's not really if you have an electorate that says, yeah, we got to do the right thing.
We get the government we deserve.
Yeah, anybody got a counter to that? Our text line is four one five two nine five KFTC.
We will finish strong. Next.
Walt Disney World is set next month to exhibit dozens of former President George W.
Bush's paintings. As if my kids weren't already begging for me to take that.
Georgia Bush is a pretty good painter. But yeah, I'm not that that's a funny joke. I'm not traveling to go watch to look at them. I'm going through more of the Stormy Daniels testimony today, the porn star Trump had sex with on the stand today and listen to this hilariousness. So we already got into the her pretending she had no idea why he invited her to his hotel suite and he's in his pajamas, and she was thinking, oh, he completely misread my intentions. All right, whatever, you're a porn star. Rich, you're a porn star in the in the in who lives in Los Angeles near in show business, A guy twice your age invites you to his hotel room.
I mean, come on, he doesn't.
But and she's not claiming anything was non consensual, So it's not a like she came in and he forced himself.
She went up.
There was claims she was shocked to find out what he wanted and then did it anyway without a condom.
This story beggar's belief. Listen to this part.
When asked about approaching Trump directly to purchase the story, this gets into the actual money part, which is the crux of the whole thing. Right, Daniels said, my motivation wasn't about money. It was to get the story out. Just before the question, Daniels responded yes when I asked if the point in October sixteen was was her focus to sell the story to news outlets, So she says it wasn't about the money. It was I just wanted the story to get out.
Really, boy, she's a bad liar. Call the New York Times say, hey, this is Stormy Daniels, I had sex with Donald Trump.
The story would be out, sweetheart as unbelievable. And I don't know what the jury's thinking now.
The New York Post reporter is claiming that, And this is always the perception of the reporters and the perception of the If I have time, I'll read the perception of the New York Times reporter, which is completely different in one of these things. But this New York Post reporter said that several jurors looked like they were having trouble keeping a straight face. But that just could be the perception of the New York Post reporter, who leans toward so. But like, listen to this from Maggie Haberman. This is her own dang, and I might have lost it because they updated. She is a liberal, yeah, and she absolutely hates Trump, but she wrote something about.
Bah lynks grow links grow ling.
Anyway, she was talking about how damaging this is to Trump's image, and how he cares about so much his image and how much this hurts.
And like I said earlier, he doesn't feel.
Damaged by having everybody know that he had sex with a twenty six year old porn star that doesn't hurt hurt him. He's not feeling embarrassed. But Maggie, heaven read how uncomfortable this must be for Trump to have the world no blah blah blah.
Are you kidding, Maggie baby? How many moons are there in your world?
Why do you think he surrounds himself with all these super hot women?
He wants to imply that these women want to be around him. That's bizarre. The whole thing is just nuts.
I have some final thoughts, and some people say they are the greatest final thoughts they've ever heard. But if you look at what's happening, I would have to say Armstrong and Getty have some wonderful final thoughts. They are right up there with Abraham Lincoln and everybody knows it.
Wow, that's so good.
Here's your host for final thoughts, Joe Getty. Let's get a final thought from everybody on the crew. Michaelangelow lead us off.
Media is going to have a field day with this, and all you're going to hear is I want to apologize viewers before I say this, but it's part of the court record.
So it's dark duty to tell you. They will happily say it and laugh as they're saying it. Right.
Oh boy, Katie Green are esteemed the newswoman disgusted by all of it.
Do you have a final thought, Katie?
Yeah, I'm a big Trump fan, but I could have gone my entire life without picturing him in his underwear.
Who big fat, old, sweaty man. Wow Wow wow Jack a final thought for us. I was just reading more from The New York Times.
Daniels described Trump's sweet and like taho, I don't remember why they were there, So he went to his suite again?
Or is that the sweeting question?
Now, every aspect, down to the color of the tiles and the sexual positions, she seems to have a photographic memory. That's what we all needed to know, isn't it?
So this numb skull isn't even the person Jonathan Turley's writing about. When he wrote an article with his headline Alvin Bragg's entire case against Trump hinges on a disbarred serial perjurer, Michael Cohen See your case hinges on Stormy Daniels and Michael Cohen. This is awful.
Yeah, it was a low moment today, low moment in American history. Absolutely.
Armstrong and Geddy wrapping up another grueling four hour work.
There so many people to thanks a little time. Go to armstrong in geddy dot com. The hot links there many fine clicks stuff we referred to. You can read it yourself. Drop us a note mail bag at armstrong in Geeddy dot comments. There's something we ought to be talking about. Pick up a T shirt or hat while.
You're there that will be delightful.
As you said, Michael, watching these news agencies act like they don't want to talk about this than talking about it. See tomorrow, God bless America.
I'm strong and Getty.
This has to stop, and it has to stop like the day before yesterday.
Frankly used to go go away. This is one of the low moments in American history. His Liz, are you sure of that, dude? Well, yep, absolutely, it is a painful moment. We get that yourself more educated. What about Jamara? Loll out of here. I've been thinking that we really all need a tremendous hug it. Thank you all very much, Audio, Armstrong and Getty