Many humanities-minded historians think that human beings and the course of human history are too complex to analyze broadly or to examine using predictive models - but one evolutionary anthropologist believes that mathematical models could be used to understand the past, and to predict the future. 

In his recent Atlantic piece “The Next Decade Could Be Even Worse”, Graeme Wood dives into the research of evolutionary biologist Peter Turchin who coined the term and discipline “cliodynamics” -  statistical modeling and analysis of the rise and fall of human societies. He explores Professor Turchin’s methods, as well as his dire predictions for the next decade in American history.

We dive into the academic endeavor to use big data and mathematics to analyze and predict history, Turchin’s predictions for the next decade and the larger tensions between science and humanities-minded academics over the validity of this approach. 

Guest: 

Graeme Wood, staff writer at The Atlantic, where his recent piece is “The Next Decade Could Be Even Worse”; lecturer in political science at Yale; he tweets @gcaw

Many humanities-minded historians think that human beings and the course of human history are too complex to analyze broadly or to examine using predictive models - but one evolutionary anthropologist believes that mathematical models could be used to understand the past, and to predict the future.&nbsp;
In his recent Atlantic piece &ldquo;<a href="https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2020/12/can-history-predict-future/616993/" data-cke-saved-href="https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2020/12/can-history-predict-future/616993/">The Next Decade Could Be Even Worse</a>&rdquo;, Graeme Wood dives into the research of evolutionary biologist Peter Turchin who coined the term and discipline &ldquo;cliodynamics&rdquo; -&nbsp; statistical modeling and analysis of the rise and fall of human societies. He explores Professor Turchin&rsquo;s methods, as well as his dire predictions for the next decade in American history.
We dive into the academic endeavor to use big data and mathematics to analyze and predict history, Turchin&rsquo;s predictions for the next decade and the larger tensions between science and humanities-minded academics over the validity of this approach.&nbsp;
Guest:&nbsp;
<a href="https://www.theatlantic.com/author/graeme-wood/" data-cke-saved-href="https://www.theatlantic.com/author/graeme-wood/">Graeme Wood</a>, staff writer at The Atlantic, where his recent piece is &ldquo;<a href="https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2020/12/can-history-predict-future/616993/" data-cke-saved-href="https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2020/12/can-history-predict-future/616993/">The Next Decade Could Be Even Worse</a>&rdquo;; lecturer in political science at Yale; he tweets&nbsp;<a href="https://twitter.com/gcaw?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor" data-cke-saved-href="https://twitter.com/gcaw?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor">@gcaw</a>

Join Larry Mantle weekdays for lively and in-depth discussions of Los Angeles and Southern California news, politics, science, entertainment, the arts and more. More AirTalk at www.kpcc.org.

Join Larry Mantle weekdays for lively and in-depth discussions of Los Angeles and Southern California news, politics, science, entertainment, the arts and more. More AirTalk at www.kpcc.org.

Lively and in-depth discussions of city news, politics, science, entertainment, the arts, and more.

Advertisement