A House Financial Services Committee recently held a hearing titled 'SEC Enforcement: Balancing Deterrence with Due Process.' The hearing focused on a number of issues that NCLA has been litigating, such as denial of due process rights through in-house adjudications, lack of jury trial rights, abusive processes in SEC investigations, use of disgorgement, the Gag rule, etc.

In this latest episode, Vec is joined by NCLA's Kara Rollins to discuss the hearing.

A House Financial Services Committee recently held a hearing titled 'SEC Enforcement: Balancing Deterrence with Due Process.' The hearing focused on a number of issues that NCLA has been litigating, such as denial of due process rights through in-house adjudications, lack of jury trial rights, abusive processes in SEC investigations, use of disgorgement, the Gag rule, etc.
In this latest episode, Vec is joined by NCLA's Kara Rollins to discuss the hearing.

Administrative Static is an irreverent legal affairs podcast that exposes the unlawful side of administrative power. Hosts Mark Chenoweth and John Vecchione will decry federal and state agency abuses, trot out legal arguments, grill expert guests, and bandy about the latest cases and controversies. 

Administrative Static is an irreverent legal affairs podcast that exposes the unlawful side of administrative power. Hosts Mark Chenoweth and John Vecchione will decry federal and state agency abuses, trot out legal arguments, grill expert guests, and bandy about the latest cases and controversies.&nbsp;

Administrative Static Podcast

Administrative Static

NCLA Discusses House Financial Services Committee hearing on SEC Enforcement

The U.S. Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision, overturned a significant preliminary injunction granted by the Fifth Circuit in Murthy v. Missouri, ruling that the parties protected by the injunction lacked standing for future relief. The injunction had prevented officials from the White House, CDC, FBI, CISA, and the Surgeon General’s office from urging social media platforms to censor constitutionally protected speech. The New Civil Liberties Alliance, representing Drs. Jayanta Bhattacharya, Martin Kulldorff, and Aaron Kheriaty, and Ms. Jill Hines, expresses disappointment over the Court's decision, which narrows Americans' First Amendment rights.

Mark, Vec, and Jenin discuss where the Justices stood on this ruling in this latest episode. 

The U.S. Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision, overturned a significant preliminary injunction granted by the Fifth Circuit in Murthy v. Missouri, ruling that the parties protected by the injunction lacked standing for future relief. The injunction had prevented officials from the White House, CDC, FBI, CISA, and the Surgeon General’s office from urging social media platforms to censor constitutionally protected speech. The New Civil Liberties Alliance, representing Drs. Jayanta Bhattacharya, Martin Kulldorff, and Aaron Kheriaty, and Ms. Jill Hines, expresses disappointment over the Court's decision, which narrows Americans' First Amendment rights. Mark, Vec, and Jenin discuss where the Justices stood on this ruling in this latest episode.

Supreme Court Issues Troubling Decision in NCLA Case Against Censorship Industrial Complex

The U.S. Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision, overturned a significant preliminary injunction granted by the Fifth Circuit in Murthy v. Missouri, ruling that the parties protected by the injunction lacked standing for future relief. The injunction had prevented officials from the White House, CDC, FBI, CISA, and the Surgeon General’s office from urging social media platforms to censor constitutionally protected speech. The New Civil Liberties Alliance, representing Drs. Jayanta Bhattacharya, Martin Kulldorff, and Aaron Kheriaty, and Ms. Jill Hines, expresses disappointment over the Court's decision, which narrows Americans' First Amendment rights.

Vec and Jenin discuss the ruling in this latest episode. 

The U.S. Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision, overturned a significant preliminary injunction granted by the Fifth Circuit in Murthy v. Missouri, ruling that the parties protected by the injunction lacked standing for future relief. The injunction had prevented officials from the White House, CDC, FBI, CISA, and the Surgeon General’s office from urging social media platforms to censor constitutionally protected speech. The New Civil Liberties Alliance, representing Drs. Jayanta Bhattacharya, Martin Kulldorff, and Aaron Kheriaty, and Ms. Jill Hines, expresses disappointment over the Court's decision, which narrows Americans' First Amendment rights. Vec and Jenin discuss the ruling in this latest episode.

The U.S. Supreme Court upheld the right to a jury trial for Americans facing administrative proceedings, striking down the SEC’s administrative prosecution regime. The Court affirmed the Fifth Circuit’s decision in SEC v. Jarkesy, ruling 6-3 that the SEC violated George R. Jarkesy Jr.’s Seventh Amendment rights by using an Administrative Law Judge without a jury. This decision, aligning with the New Civil Liberties Alliance’s amicus brief, marks a significant victory for civil liberties and limits the SEC’s abuse of power.

Mark, Vec, and Jenin continue to discuss the win in this episode and dig into an interesting footnote. 

The U.S. Supreme Court upheld the right to a jury trial for Americans facing administrative proceedings, striking down the SEC’s administrative prosecution regime. The Court affirmed the Fifth Circuit’s decision in SEC v. Jarkesy, ruling 6-3 that the SEC violated George R. Jarkesy Jr.’s Seventh Amendment rights by using an Administrative Law Judge without a jury. This decision, aligning with the New Civil Liberties Alliance’s amicus brief, marks a significant victory for civil liberties and limits the SEC’s abuse of power. Mark, Vec, and Jenin continue to discuss the win in this episode and dig into an interesting footnote.

NCLA Discusses House Financial Services Committee hearing on SEC Enforcement

In 1 playlist(s)

Administrative Static

Follow podcast

Recent clips