The New Civil Liberties Alliance has filed a petition with the Ninth Circuit to review the SEC’s denial of our long-standing petition to amend the agency’s “Gag Rule.” In place for over five decades, this pernicious rule forbids every American who settles a regulatory enforcement case with SEC from even truthfully criticizing their cases in public.

Representing several SEC enforcement targets silenced by the Gag Rule, NCLA’s Peggy Little talks with Vec about the petition and this egregious trampling of First Amendment rights.

The New Civil Liberties Alliance has filed a petition with the Ninth Circuit to review the SEC’s denial of our long-standing petition to amend the agency’s “Gag Rule.” In place for over five decades, this pernicious rule forbids every American who settles a regulatory enforcement case with SEC from even truthfully criticizing their cases in public.
Representing several SEC enforcement targets silenced by the Gag Rule, NCLA’s Peggy Little talks with Vec about the petition and this egregious trampling of First Amendment rights.

Administrative Static is an irreverent legal affairs podcast that exposes the unlawful side of administrative power. Hosts Mark Chenoweth and John Vecchione will decry federal and state agency abuses, trot out legal arguments, grill expert guests, and bandy about the latest cases and controversies. 

Administrative Static is an irreverent legal affairs podcast that exposes the unlawful side of administrative power. Hosts Mark Chenoweth and John Vecchione will decry federal and state agency abuses, trot out legal arguments, grill expert guests, and bandy about the latest cases and controversies.&nbsp;

Administrative Static Podcast

Administrative Static

NCLA Asks Ninth Circuit to Overturn SEC’s Illegal Gag Rule on Targets of Settled Enforcement Cases

The House Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government convened a hearing pertinent to two of NCLA's cases challenging the government's unconstitutional infringement on freedom of speech—Murthy v. Missouri and Changizi v. HHS. The hearing scrutinized the Biden White House's censorship policies implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic. 

In this episode, Jenin, Vec, and Mark delve into the proceedings of the hearing.

The House Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government convened a hearing pertinent to two of NCLA's cases challenging the government's unconstitutional infringement on freedom of speech—Murthy v. Missouri and Changizi v. HHS. The hearing scrutinized the Biden White House's censorship policies implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic. 
In this episode, Jenin, Vec, and Mark delve into the proceedings of the hearing.

NCLA Discusses Recent House Hearing on Biden Censorship Scheme

When a federal judge accedes to an agency's interpretation of the law, it essentially deprives the non-governmental party involved in the litigation of due process. Moreover, such deference undermines the judge's Article III mandate to uphold judicial independence. The notion of Chevron deference becomes particularly untenable when considering these significant drawbacks. NCLA is actively challenging Chevron in the case of Relentless v. DOC, staunchly advocating for judicial independence.

In this episode, Vec, Mark, and Jenin delve into a recent Law and Liberty article titled "Constitutional Government After Chevron?" which examines how the cessation of Chevron deference might impact our constitutional institutions holistically.

When a federal judge accedes to an agency's interpretation of the law, it essentially deprives the non-governmental party involved in the litigation of due process. Moreover, such deference undermines the judge's Article III mandate to uphold judicial independence. The notion of Chevron deference becomes particularly untenable when considering these significant drawbacks. NCLA is actively challenging Chevron in the case of Relentless v. DOC, staunchly advocating for judicial independence.
In this episode, Vec, Mark, and Jenin delve into a recent Law and Liberty article titled "Constitutional Government After Chevron?" which examines how the cessation of Chevron deference might impact our constitutional institutions holistically.

NCLA Discusses Constitutional Government in a Possible Post-Chevron World

In their latest episode, Vec, Mark, and Jenin delve into the contentious firing of Martin Dickman, the inspector general of the U.S. Railroad Retirement Board (RRB), by the Biden Administration. Questions surrounding allegations of creating a "hostile work environment" have drawn scrutiny, prompting Senator Chuck Grassley to address the lack of clarity in the reasons provided to Congress for Dickman's dismissal.

In their latest episode, Vec, Mark, and Jenin delve into the contentious firing of Martin Dickman, the inspector general of the U.S. Railroad Retirement Board (RRB), by the Biden Administration. Questions surrounding allegations of creating a "hostile work environment" have drawn scrutiny, prompting Senator Chuck Grassley to address the lack of clarity in the reasons provided to Congress for Dickman's dismissal.

NCLA Asks Ninth Circuit to Overturn SEC’s Illegal Gag Rule on Targets of Settled Enforcement Cases

Administrative Static Podcast

In 1 playlist(s)

Administrative Static

Follow podcast

Recent clips