Vec recently attended the SCOTUS argument in the case of Trump v. United States. This pivotal case aims to define the scope of immunity for former presidents regarding potential criminal prosecution for actions allegedly tied to their official duties while in office.

In this episode, Mark and Vec discuss the highlights of the oral argument and case. 

Vec recently attended the SCOTUS argument in the case of Trump v. United States. This pivotal case aims to define the scope of immunity for former presidents regarding potential criminal prosecution for actions allegedly tied to their official duties while in office.
In this episode, Mark and Vec discuss the highlights of the oral argument and case.

Administrative Static is an irreverent legal affairs podcast that exposes the unlawful side of administrative power. Hosts Mark Chenoweth and John Vecchione will decry federal and state agency abuses, trot out legal arguments, grill expert guests, and bandy about the latest cases and controversies. 

Administrative Static is an irreverent legal affairs podcast that exposes the unlawful side of administrative power. Hosts Mark Chenoweth and John Vecchione will decry federal and state agency abuses, trot out legal arguments, grill expert guests, and bandy about the latest cases and controversies.&nbsp;

Administrative Static Podcast

Administrative Static

Vec Reports on Oral Argument in Trump v. United States

The NCLA has notified the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) of its intent to sue the agency over Commissioner Richard Trumka’s alleged violation of Dreamland Baby Co.’s constitutional and statutory rights. Dreamland, which manufactures infant and toddler products, claims Trumka made false and damaging public statements suggesting its wearable infant sleep sacks caused infant deaths. The NCLA’s letter demands that CPSC and Trumka preserve all related documents and communications and cease their illegal actions against Dreamland. 

NCLA's Kara Rollins joins Mark, Vec, and Jenin to discuss the details.

The NCLA has notified the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) of its intent to sue the agency over Commissioner Richard Trumka’s alleged violation of Dreamland Baby Co.’s constitutional and statutory rights. Dreamland, which manufactures infant and toddler products, claims Trumka made false and damaging public statements suggesting its wearable infant sleep sacks caused infant deaths. The NCLA’s letter demands that CPSC and Trumka preserve all related documents and communications and cease their illegal actions against Dreamland. 
NCLA's Kara Rollins joins Mark, Vec, and Jenin to discuss the details.

NCLA Plans to Sue CPSC over Comm’r Trumka’s Illegal Efforts to Stop Sales of Weighted Sleep Sacks

In a 7-2 decision, the US Supreme Court ruled in Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Community Financial Services Association of America that the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's (CFPB) funding mechanism is constitutional.

The CFPB operates with a funding method outside direct Congressional control. The NCLA, along with The Buckeye Institute and the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, filed an amicus curiae brief urging the Court to overturn the CFPB’s funding method as a violation of the Constitution’s Appropriations Clause.

NCLA's Mark and Vec have a lively discussion about this decision in this latest episode! 

In a 7-2 decision, the US Supreme Court ruled in Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Community Financial Services Association of America that the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's (CFPB) funding mechanism is constitutional.
The CFPB operates with a funding method outside direct Congressional control. The NCLA, along with The Buckeye Institute and the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, filed an amicus curiae brief urging the Court to overturn the CFPB’s funding method as a violation of the Constitution’s Appropriations Clause.
NCLA's Mark and Vec have a lively discussion about this decision in this latest episode!

SCOTUS rules in Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Community Financial Services Association of America

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit upheld the dismissal of the In re Bystolic antitrust lawsuit! NCLA supported this outcome in its amicus brief, while the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) supported the plaintiffs despite not filing suit. NCLA argued that plaintiffs must show a large net payment, not just a large gross payment, to prove antitrust violations. The Second Circuit ruled that plaintiffs failed to state a valid claim. NCLA and the International Center for Law and Economics (ICLE) applaud this decision!

Mark and Vec discuss and celebrate the victory in this latest episode. 

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit upheld the dismissal of the In re Bystolic antitrust lawsuit! NCLA supported this outcome in its amicus brief, while the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) supported the plaintiffs despite not filing suit. NCLA argued that plaintiffs must show a large net payment, not just a large gross payment, to prove antitrust violations. The Second Circuit ruled that plaintiffs failed to state a valid claim. NCLA and the International Center for Law and Economics (ICLE) applaud this decision! Mark and Vec discuss and celebrate the victory in this latest episode.

Vec Reports on Oral Argument in Trump v. United States

In 1 playlist(s)

Administrative Static

Follow podcast

Recent clips