NCLA continues to fight on behalf of Honorable Judge Pauline Newman as she faces unjust attempts from her colleagues to remove her from a constitutionally appointed lifetime position as a Federal Cir. Judge. This case isn’t just about restoring her to the bench—it is about the very independence of the federal judiciary and the ability of each federal judge to fulfill the office constitutionally entrusted to her.

Mark and Vec are joined by NCLA Senior Litigation Counsel Geg Dolin who provides updates on Judge Pauline Newman’s case against the Judicial Council of the Federal Circuit.

NCLA continues to fight on behalf of Honorable Judge Pauline Newman as she faces unjust attempts from her colleagues to remove her from a constitutionally appointed lifetime position as a Federal Cir. Judge. This case isn’t just about restoring her to the bench—it is about the very independence of the federal judiciary and the ability of each federal judge to fulfill the office constitutionally entrusted to her.
Mark and Vec are joined by NCLA Senior Litigation Counsel Geg Dolin who provides updates on Judge Pauline Newman’s case against the Judicial Council of the Federal Circuit.

Administrative Static is an irreverent legal affairs podcast that exposes the unlawful side of administrative power. Hosts Mark Chenoweth and John Vecchione will decry federal and state agency abuses, trot out legal arguments, grill expert guests, and bandy about the latest cases and controversies. 

Administrative Static is an irreverent legal affairs podcast that exposes the unlawful side of administrative power. Hosts Mark Chenoweth and John Vecchione will decry federal and state agency abuses, trot out legal arguments, grill expert guests, and bandy about the latest cases and controversies.&nbsp;

Administrative Static Podcast

Administrative Static

NCLA Continues the Fight to End Unlawful Suspension of Federal Circuit Judge Pauline Newman

The House Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government convened a hearing pertinent to two of NCLA's cases challenging the government's unconstitutional infringement on freedom of speech—Murthy v. Missouri and Changizi v. HHS. The hearing scrutinized the Biden White House's censorship policies implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic. 

In this episode, Jenin, Vec, and Mark delve into the proceedings of the hearing.

The House Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government convened a hearing pertinent to two of NCLA's cases challenging the government's unconstitutional infringement on freedom of speech—Murthy v. Missouri and Changizi v. HHS. The hearing scrutinized the Biden White House's censorship policies implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic. 
In this episode, Jenin, Vec, and Mark delve into the proceedings of the hearing.

NCLA Discusses Recent House Hearing on Biden Censorship Scheme

When a federal judge accedes to an agency's interpretation of the law, it essentially deprives the non-governmental party involved in the litigation of due process. Moreover, such deference undermines the judge's Article III mandate to uphold judicial independence. The notion of Chevron deference becomes particularly untenable when considering these significant drawbacks. NCLA is actively challenging Chevron in the case of Relentless v. DOC, staunchly advocating for judicial independence.

In this episode, Vec, Mark, and Jenin delve into a recent Law and Liberty article titled "Constitutional Government After Chevron?" which examines how the cessation of Chevron deference might impact our constitutional institutions holistically.

When a federal judge accedes to an agency's interpretation of the law, it essentially deprives the non-governmental party involved in the litigation of due process. Moreover, such deference undermines the judge's Article III mandate to uphold judicial independence. The notion of Chevron deference becomes particularly untenable when considering these significant drawbacks. NCLA is actively challenging Chevron in the case of Relentless v. DOC, staunchly advocating for judicial independence.
In this episode, Vec, Mark, and Jenin delve into a recent Law and Liberty article titled "Constitutional Government After Chevron?" which examines how the cessation of Chevron deference might impact our constitutional institutions holistically.

NCLA Discusses Constitutional Government in a Possible Post-Chevron World

In their latest episode, Vec, Mark, and Jenin delve into the contentious firing of Martin Dickman, the inspector general of the U.S. Railroad Retirement Board (RRB), by the Biden Administration. Questions surrounding allegations of creating a "hostile work environment" have drawn scrutiny, prompting Senator Chuck Grassley to address the lack of clarity in the reasons provided to Congress for Dickman's dismissal.

In their latest episode, Vec, Mark, and Jenin delve into the contentious firing of Martin Dickman, the inspector general of the U.S. Railroad Retirement Board (RRB), by the Biden Administration. Questions surrounding allegations of creating a "hostile work environment" have drawn scrutiny, prompting Senator Chuck Grassley to address the lack of clarity in the reasons provided to Congress for Dickman's dismissal.

NCLA Continues the Fight to End Unlawful Suspension of Federal Circuit Judge Pauline Newman

In 1 playlist(s)

Administrative Static

Follow podcast

Recent clips