This week, NCLA will be presenting oral argument before SCOTUS in Garland v. Cargill, a case that challenges ATF’s unlawful expansion of the statutory definition of a “machinegun.”

Mark and Vec preview the upcoming oral argument in Garland v. Cargill before the highest court in the land.

This week, NCLA will be presenting oral argument before SCOTUS in Garland v. Cargill, a case that challenges ATF’s unlawful expansion of the statutory definition of a “machinegun.”
Mark and Vec preview the upcoming oral argument in Garland v. Cargill before the highest court in the land.

Administrative Static is an irreverent legal affairs podcast that exposes the unlawful side of administrative power. Hosts Mark Chenoweth and John Vecchione will decry federal and state agency abuses, trot out legal arguments, grill expert guests, and bandy about the latest cases and controversies. 

Administrative Static is an irreverent legal affairs podcast that exposes the unlawful side of administrative power. Hosts Mark Chenoweth and John Vecchione will decry federal and state agency abuses, trot out legal arguments, grill expert guests, and bandy about the latest cases and controversies.&nbsp;

Administrative Static Podcast

Administrative Static

NCLA Asks Supreme Court to Rule Against ATF’s Unilateral Bump-Stock Ban

NCLA is fighting back against the Department of Education’s $475 billion “SAVE” plan, which illegally shifts student loan debt to taxpayers! The plan rewrites the Higher Education Act in ways Congress never approved. After a divided Tenth Circuit panel lifted a crucial injunction against this scheme, NCLA has teamed up with the Cato Institute, Mackinac Center, and Defense of Freedom Institute to challenge this unconstitutional overreach.

Join Mark, Vec, and Jenin as they dive into this explosive case and the battle to stop executive overreach!

NCLA is fighting back against the Department of Education’s $475 billion “SAVE” plan, which illegally shifts student loan debt to taxpayers! The plan rewrites the Higher Education Act in ways Congress never approved. After a divided Tenth Circuit panel lifted a crucial injunction against this scheme, NCLA has teamed up with the Cato Institute, Mackinac Center, and Defense of Freedom Institute to challenge this unconstitutional overreach.
Join Mark, Vec, and Jenin as they dive into this explosive case and the battle to stop executive overreach!

NCLA Asks Supreme Court to Block Education Dept.’s Latest Illegal Scheme to Cancel Student Loan Debt

NCLA is taking on government censorship once more! In Dressen v. Flaherty, we're challenging the federal government’s collusion with social media giants and the Stanford Internet Observatory’s Virality Project to censor online support groups for COVID-19 vaccine injuries, echoing our fight in Murthy v. Missouri.

Join NCLA’s Casey Norman with Mark, Jenin, and Vec as they explore this critical case and the fight to restore the plaintiffs' civil liberties.

NCLA is taking on government censorship once more! In Dressen v. Flaherty, we're challenging the federal government’s collusion with social media giants and the Stanford Internet Observatory’s Virality Project to censor online support groups for COVID-19 vaccine injuries, echoing our fight in Murthy v. Missouri.
Join NCLA’s Casey Norman with Mark, Jenin, and Vec as they explore this critical case and the fight to restore the plaintiffs' civil liberties.

NCLA Challenges Government’s Censorship of Support Groups for Victims of Covid Vaccine Injuries

NCLA’s amicus brief in Mohamud v. Weyker takes on a dangerous trend of courts shielding cross-deputized officers from accountability. This critical case argues that Americans should still have the right to pursue damages for constitutional violations, even when officers are operating under both state and federal authority. 

In this episode, Mark, Vec, and Jenin are joined by NCLA’s Casey Norman to unpack the implications of this high-stakes legal battle and how this case is pivotal for holding law enforcement accountable.

NCLA’s amicus brief in Mohamud v. Weyker takes on a dangerous trend of courts shielding cross-deputized officers from accountability. This critical case argues that Americans should still have the right to pursue damages for constitutional violations, even when officers are operating under both state and federal authority.  In this episode, Mark, Vec, and Jenin are joined by NCLA’s Casey Norman to unpack the implications of this high-stakes legal battle and how this case is pivotal for holding law enforcement accountable.

NCLA Asks Supreme Court to Rule Against ATF’s Unilateral Bump-Stock Ban

In 1 playlist(s)

Administrative Static

Follow podcast

Recent clips