Our time, energy, and emotions are valuable because they are finite.
And yet conversations with Seth Godin always leave me feeling more patient, energized, and full of love.
Seth is a prolific author and a marketing genius who knows first-hand how love can take an interaction from transactional to transformational.
This is… A Bit of Optimism.
For more on Seth and his work check out:
A Song of Significance, out May 2023: https://geni.us/pdnqnz
Great ideas are not magic tricks. You don't just pull a rabbit out of a hat and there you have it. It's a great idea. There's a lot of work that goes into great ideas. It's more like a sculpture made out of stone, where there's a hammer and a chisel and you chip away at something and it slowly takes form. And one of the best ways to come up with great ideas is to allow someone to push you to chip further and deeper and harder, to round all the square edges. That's what happens whenever I talk to Seth Godin. He is a god in the marketing world and a prolific author who just came out with a new book called The Song of Significance. Whenever I get together with him, he pushes me and challenges me and forces me to think deeper about the ideas that I have so that when we get to the end, I guess it is a bit of magic. This is a bit of optimism. So I love you, and I don't think i've ever told you the reason I love you. When my career was just starting out, you and I had the opportunity to speak on the same stage, and I had paid money to go to events that you were speaking at in the past, so I definitely knew who you were. And you were sitting in the green room and you were off by yourself in a corner, and I walked in and I wanted to introduce myself. I mean, you were one of the people I admired and loved. And I knocked on the door and you looked up and you go, oh, A bunch of people have told me I need to meet you, and you saw me do my thing, and you came up to me after this and said you were really good. You want to go for lunch, and already I'm like floating. We traded numbers and you said call me if you ever need anything, and I called you when I needed advice, and you always took the call, and you always were honest with me, and you were honest with me because you wanted me to do well. I never got a sense that there was anything self serving or anything like that. And you're one of the people in my life who I know I'll always get an unadulterated, honest input. Don't always agree, but I know it's always unadulterated and honest and done with love. Well, if you're not going to do it with love, then what's the point because it's not a hustle, it's life, right, You don't get tomorrow over again. So how do you show up for people who you admire, who are kind, who you care about in a way that you do it again? And I don't understand why you would calculate what's going to be the best thing for me in this transaction when you have the chance to say, how can I turn on a light and open a door? And if this person wants to come, that's great, and if they don't, well that's okay too. This idea of doing something with love, I think is a really interesting one. What does that mean to do something with love? And how do you know somebody is acting with love? Which is different than I really like you or I really respect you. Those aren't the same thing. I do things for people that I like, I do things for people I respect, and I can't say that I always do things with love. Though, What do you mean when you say do it with love? That's not a standard for everybody, is it. I think it's too exhausting for it to be a standard with everybody. We want to have low trust, high stakes transactions, often in order to live our lives now. We want things to be the way they were supposed to be, cut and dry. Even Steven deals a deal, We're done, and part of that is the idea of the transaction being over. No one owes anybody. And what we learned from Lewis Hyde's book The Gift, is that gifts connect us, whether they are physical gifts or the gift of an emotion, and giving someone an emotion, for privileged folks like us, is more expensive than giving them a candle, right, because that emotion is finite and we can't give it out all day long. And the question is, you know, my late friend zig Ziggler used to say, you can get everything in life you want if you'll help enough other people get what they want. I had a problem with that because it implies that the purpose of helping other people get what they want is to help you get what you want. And I am much more comfortable with you can help other people get what they want period, because the period has so much joy in it. To be able to say without exhausting me or causing myself harm, I held the door open for somebody for an extra minute. There's love in that, and then real exertion on behalf of somebody else becomes even more special. It's a privilege to be able to say this was truly inconvenient for me, and yet I did it because I could. I think there's also a fine line between doing things with love and giving and helping people get what they want and martyrdom. And I've definitely seen people do this where they hold themselves to this, and I don't think they're they're not virtue signaling, like, look at all the things I did for you with love. It's not that, it's that they genuinely believe that it's good to give a life of service, give, give, give a give, give to the point of burnout, exhaustion, and self destruction. And so we believe in giving, but we don't believe in giving to everyone. We believe in serving, but we don't believe in serving everyone. We believe in loving, but we don't believe in loving everyone. And I think the thing that I'm trying to sort of get to is when do we give with love and when do we know to hold it back because it actually is too much or overdoing it? Or in this case, I'm being exploited and I didn't even realize that where it's not worth it, and to the point where I exhaust myself, h I burn myself out and I hurt myself. The best B to B sales book ever written is by Manan Costlo. It's called Let's Get Real or Let's Not Play. And I don't want to talk about that book, but I want to talk about the title, which I mentioned several times in my new book, Let's Get Real or Let's Not Play. And what it says is, this bus is going to Cleveland. If you want to go to Topeka, don't get on this bus. Don't complain about where the bus is going. Turnover is a good thing. We're going over there. Come if you want to come. And so a big thing for me about the intention of relationship is let's get real about what change we're seeking to make, about what kind of interaction we are seeking to have. That there are people that I have met who I got off to a good start with, as I got off to a good start with you, who then came back too many times and made it clear through their behavior that I was going one place on this bus and they were going someplace else, and I don't want to sign up for that. I am not here to bleed for people who aren't going to get real. That's not a healthy relationship. And so this isn't about how do we keep score. It's not about how do we trade favors, because trading favors in itself is a significant turnoff for me. And so, just to give you a trivial example that I think people can possibly relate to, one of the things has been going on in the book business since the term was coined by the person who wrote the poem Purple Cow, I might add blurbing books. Blurbing books have been around for about one hundred years in which one author says something nice about another's author's book, and it used to be an actual gift and actual true connection, and in the last seven years, hustle culture has turned it into how do I collect as many of these blurbs for the back of my book as I can, which why I don't have blurbs in my books. And I am trying still to pay forward what Tom Peters did for me all those years ago when he blurbed one of my books and made me feel like I was a member of the community, and what I found is, first of all, people show up with a pre written blurb, which offends me. Second, they don't expect me to read the book, which offends me. Third, I have a two page memo where I say, before you ask me to do this, these are the things I'm going to ask in return about how you use my name and stuff. And about half the time they angle to get a better deal. And as a result, I can't blur books anymore because it sucks. It's like no good deed goes unpunished, because good deeds don't matter anymore because it's trading favors. Who wants to live a life of hustle and trading faith? I want to live a life as a human. Before I forget, I have to share two funny stories about the blurbing topic, semi unrelated. Number one, someone I love and care about said, I'm in a jam. Somebody asked me if you would blurb this book and it was an obscure book about an obscure topic. Yeah, And I was like, but I'm not gonna lie, but I needed to do it. So iry about if you're looking for information about obscure topic this is a great place to start. I love that blurb. But the second thing is for the new book, I needed a blurb, so I got one from GPT three. I'm the first person who's had their book blurbed by artificial intellience, so good. I remember I asked you a bunch of years ago, what is your standard for blurbing, and you said, there has to be at least one idea in there worth twenty four ninety five. And I want that blurb on the back of my book. I want to have my next book. Publisher says there's at least one idea in here worth twenty four ninety five. Seth Godin, that's going to be the only blurb we're going to have on the back of my book. That's my dream. So I think the point we're making is what used to be done as a gift has not become a transaction in this hustle culture. A lot of things that used to be done with generosity have now become part of the hustle because somebody said you got to have this, and everybody looks for that. Even on TikTok, where people used to like genuinely buy a product, genuinely like a product genuinely make sort of a homegrown commercial saying I really like this, and now because that seems to quote unquote work, people are being paid to appear like they genuinely bought it and appear like they genuinely like it, and those things are all over social media. And I can't believe that companies think that we can't tell the difference between somebody who is actually into something and somebody who's kind of into something. It might be into something, but taking money for being into something and all of these things that used to be done with generosity and kindness. I'm not asking for anything in return. I don't want free product, I want free money. I don't want anything. Have now become a business. I was with you into the last clause. Companies only do this because it works, and it works because human beings are components in a giant system, not people who truly want to show up as people. I mean, some people are making millions of dollars doing what you're describing, and it's because the companies are making tens of millions of dollars paying them millions of dollars. This is something sad about advertising. I think when TVO first showed up. When digital records first showed up, one of the great promises is you can skip commercials. Now. Digital has forced us to watch commercials. But the thing that I find is hilarious is now we live in a world and I don't care what platform you're watching on, where commercials have a countdown, you know, in a minute and a half, thirty seconds or only five seconds more and then you can skip the commercial. Now, if you think about it, how bad does your product have to be that you actually have a timer to tell people how much they have to suffer? And so my question to the advertising industry is, why don't you make a great product so we actually want to enjoy it? Oh Simon, Simon Simon. So, one of the most beloved TV commercials of all time is the Me and Joe Green commercial from Coca Cola, and one of the other ones is I'd like to Teach the World to sing. So beloved it became a top forty song. Evidence shows that neither one of those commercials sold one bottle of coke. On the other hand, TV commercials that are run on the Super Bowl in the first half that promote chips or beer computers are now in place so sophisticated that they can find out how many people ran out during halftime to the convenience store and bought that brand wow in the minutes afterwards. And they have discovered that it is obnoxious, annoying commercials that human beings actually take action on because we have been indoctrinated again to be in this Pavlovian relationship in the interruptions. And the last part is if you think about a magazine like Vogue, people who read Vogue magazine would pay extra for the issue with ads in it. They would pay less for the issue with no ads. So we say we hate the ads, but we still buy the things that are in the ads. That's just the way human beings click. A bit of optimism just became a bit of depression. Sorry, but it's I have to share things that are true. One of the challenges we have of end game industrial capitalism is stuff that would have been completely unacceptable fifteen or twenty years ago, and the way we treat other people is now, Well, I have to do it. It's my job, and this really bothers me. So I came up with a phrase that made me think of you when I wrote it, which is the whole idea that there is a department in a company called human resources gives away the whole game. And my point is humans are not a resource. Humans are the point advertisers have been treating humans like a bank instead of them like people. You're one of the great marketers in the world, and your work has from decades been the bibles that we turn to to learn how to market. What about marketing doesn't work now that you used to, and also vice versa. I guess the first thing I would say is I have, on a percentage basis, been one of the most ignored writers in any field ever, and lots of people who are in the field may be aware of my work, but the pressures of their work short term caused them to ignore it. So permission marketing says, take your time, earn permission. Being heard and trusted by people is way more valuable than spamming them and interrupting them. Nobody disagrees with this idea, and yet in the time since you and I started talking, fourteen pieces of spam ended up in my box, some from brands we've heard of, right because the person who did it didn't say I'm a jerk and a thief. They're just like a jerk and a thief because they think that's what their boss wants. So I would say the biggest shift for sure is we have shifted from brand advertising, which is an ad you don't know if it's going to work, and you can't measure if it's going to work, so you want to be proud of it, which is almost all the ads there were until twenty years ago, to direct ads, which can be measured. So anything that's happening on the Internet can be measured, and you can bet they can tell if you're clicking. That's why you see so many weird things online because they're not doing it to talk to a human, they're doing it to talk to a database. I wonder how much of this is because the nature of brand has changed as companies went online, right, because the barriers to entry for an online company are very low, but the barriers for exit are also very low. So like, oh, I loved friendst until my Space come along, and I loved MySpace until Facebook came along, and like we all loved it until something else came along. Because it's really quick and easy, and if you think about it, some of the big, expensive, famous brands that are purely online. Let's take Amazon. Amazon is a great example. Right. We like Amazon because Amazon's super convenient, but few if anybody loves Amazon, no matter how much they spend on advertising. We'll never love Amazon because we never get to interact with Amazon other than online. The question I'm asking is can we fall in love with something that exists solely in a virtual space. There's so much juicy stuff here. I would love to decode this. You ready. The original name of Amazon, which they still own, which still redirects to them, is relentless dot com. And Jeff's entire point of view is he wants to be direct, marketing driven and transactional. The turnover at Amazon is so high that it costs twenty five percent of their company's total profit last year, and that more than half the people who were hired lasted lesson sixty days, and in some cities they are worried that they are run out of human beings to hire who haven't already worked at Amazon and quick. So Amazon is an algorithm, a machine, and he could have built a brand that people decided to love, but instead he chose to have no voice, no feel, nothing but convenient transaction because he asserted that he could get so far ahead of anybody else they could never catch up with him on that axis. And by refusing to be distracted by the clever teddy bear that they could have built, he said, no, the only way we're going to keep winning is by being more relentless than anybody else, and he delivered on that. A couple of years after Google started, I was in Union Square in New York wearing a Google shirt that they had given me instead of paying me to give a speech, I got a shirt. I'm standing in the square and this woman who's like one hundred yards away, who has a beautiful dog, and she's sort of attractive. She sees me and she says Google, and she starts coming over and she looks at me and says, do you work at Google? I love Google, and proceeds to chat me up right, Because in those days, the search results you found on Google were unifferentiated from the search results of Yahoo. If you switched the logos, the search results were the same. But Google presented itself in a way that had mystery and delight and surprise as part of it. And this particular woman fell in love with that feeling. Google, because it is run by technocrats, also veered away from being a brand you could fall in love with, But there are plenty of brands, including Simon Sinek, who human beings have decided to fall in love with in a digital space because it completes them in some way. I can go down this rabbit hole for a very long time because I find it endlessly fascinating. And you know, I'm a huge fan of the human being, and I'm even more fan of the human relationship. I have a story to tell everybody that's one of my favorite stories in the world, and it is a story told of sheer love. And I think my definition of love. What I love about time and energy is their non redeemable commodities. If you have two friends and you're moving, and one friend says, I'll give you five thousand dollars towards the moving van, super generous, and the other friend says, I'll come to your house, I'll fill up the boxes with you, I'll spend all day with you, I'll load the van with you, I'll drive with you to the new house, and i'll help you unload all the boxes. And six months later, both of them ask for a favor on the same day, you're going to go with the one who gave their non redeemable time and energy, because it's actually worth more than any amount of money. When we talk about what is love, my definition is and someone is that they give without desire for return, but they give time and energy. Thanksgiving is my favorite holiday, and I love Thanksgiving. And I came to your house for dinner shortly after Thanksgiving in early December, and because it was close enough, the conversation was, how was your Thanksgiving? And I went on an unfortunate rent that my Thanksgiving was awful. I went to a friends giving of a friend of a friend, and this guy fancied himself an amateur chef, and he ruined Thanksgiving because he thought it would make it better to take every dish and make them worse, to add fois gras to frickin' stuffing, and to add too much butter to everything, and put caviare in everything and makes everything so rich and so awful that everything was inedible. One dish like that, two dishes like that is a luxury, but every dish like that ruins Thanksgiving. And he ruined Thanksgiving for me, And I told you the story and then we had dinner four months later, five months later, many months later, I came to your house for dinner and you made me a full Thanksgiving dinner with all the turkey, all the stuffing, all the traditional things done traditionally. And I think it was just the three of us having dinner, you, Helene and me, and we had a Thanksgiving feast. And I don't even want to make a full Thanksgiving on Thanksgiving, and you made me a full Thanksgiving for dinner. And if that is not an act of love, then nothing else is. Well. Thank you for reminding me of that story. And I want to say I probably got more out of it than you did. Let's go back to the beginning of where this started, like when do you know when to do something and when not to and when do you risk burnout? And I think to your point, which is there is a cost, there is a payment, an emotional payment, and when that when you say when the giving of the time and the energy that I got more out of that expense than your receipt of the gift, I think that is the test of love, that the joy that the giver derives from the extreme expense is actually greater than the receiver. Part of the cost to this is in a post village world where we all live now, particularly as people seek to become famous, is the difficult work of choosing to be less connected and less famous than you could be. And so most people who send me an email will get an auto reply that if somebody is going to have a zoom call with me, it's only going to last fifteen minutes. That I'm going to make it very clear to them that there is a bound in the kind of promise I want to make them, because what I have found is two things happen with people who don't make those bounds. Either, they end up really disappointing you because they have confused the signals they've been sending you. Because you know, this first started for me when I left my job in nineteen eighty six. I had been working with who was in the industry I was moving to. On four occasions, as soon as you leave, come to New York, I will introduce you to the people you need to know. We will make sure you get a good start. Four times he said that, And when I really needed it, and the time came. Nothing Crickets never ever got anything from him, from him with him to him whatever for in the next five years, because he didn't mean it, He just needed to have that feeling in the short run when it wasn't going to be anything that mattered to feel good or people. And I've seen this, and you've seen this a lot people who meanwhile keep promising it and then they run out and they just break and they think that they are living a life of substance and meaning, but what they're really doing is sprinting away from the noise in their head by trying to serve as many people as they possibly can, and then they end up disappointing everybody. Yeah, saying no, I'm really good at saying no. Have you always been good at it? Or did you have to learn it? Saying no and failing, I think are two of my best skill So how did you I'm not going to ask you how you learned to fail? I'm assuming that that's natural. No, learning to fail was an intentional act. Actually go on. But this is more interesting, I think than the no part. The learning to fail, the expression this might not work yeah makes some people very uncomfortable. I made a bunch of T shirts for a dozen people who spent some time in my office years ago and had a picture of Humpty Dumpty, and it said, this might not work. And I wear that shirt all the time. A lot of people have trouble wearing that shirt because just saying it makes people really uncomfortable. So what I learned when I was twelve, probably thirteen, I decided to get joy out of anything that was generous, not selfish, but generous where I could add and this might not work to it. And at first I didn't get joy, but then I did it enough times that I could find the joy. Do you know what I find genius about that is it's an expectation setter. We're so afraid of failing, and we're so afraid that our self worth comes from our success, and if we have any kind of failure, people would judge us. And to say this might not work puts the possibility of failure on the table, and so all you have to do is enjoy it. I think you're right. I think for all of us to say this might not work before we say our ideas out loud takes the accountability off of us and makes it a team effort. Right, this might not work, Let's do this is what the team decides versus I think we should do this. Now the accountability is on me, and now it has to work otherwise I look like an idiot and I have pardon the humpty dumpty pun, but egg on my face. Oooo. Well done right, thank you, thank you? All right? So the no part, it's the yeses that end up getting you into trouble because you've sold tomorrow, whereas if you say no now you're on the hook for the stuff you've already said yes to. Oh, that is such a good definition that saying no is what gets you out of trouble. So you don't think of it as rejecting someone and hurting someone's feeling. You think of it as getting yourself out of trouble. The amount of things that I agree to because I'm so worried about how there was, but I ended up screwing it up for them and for me, no keeps me out of trouble. Oh, I love that. How do you decide what's worth writing a book about? Like? How did you decide that your latest book was worth writing about? Because you are more prolific than I am, and I'm curious. Is it just it's partially because you just have discipline to write that I don't have. But I'm also curious when you decide an idea that you have because you generate a lot of ideas when they're worth writing about. I used to be significantly more prolific than you because I was so close to bankruptcy for so long, and new books were the only way forward. So well, I would wake up in the morning saying, the way to relieve my situation is what's the next book? So there was a book on a regular schedule that stopped a bunch of years ago. Now I only write a book as a last resort, and the last resort is can I get rid of this idea by sharing it as a blog post? Can I get this idea to the people we need to hear it by doing X, Y or Z, Or does this idea demand this thing that's going to take a year of my life. It's going to give me sinu sidist, It's going to be physically difficult and be a significant professional risk as we look at books differently. So the Song of Significance happened because I was face to face with a few forms of tragedy and mortality. I was staring at industrial titans belittling and harassing their employees. I was looking at a signal change in the way our culture works, and I said, I feel I have to do this because if I don't, I won't be able to tell myself why. And as I explained to Rich when I was talking to him two days after it happened, when I was in California, right when I was going to see you, I almost drowned, and being in the ocean and knowing that that was probably the end of that, I thought about my family, and I thought about the fact that I had to do this project. I didn't know you nearly drowned. Yeah, it's your fault, because if I had been at your house, it wouldn't happen. I have no witty response for that whatsoever. I will accept that responsibility if you are willing to pay for the therapy bills. I didn't mean to harsh your melo. You didn't harsh my mellow at all. I'm just glad that the god of the ocean sought fit that day to leave you on our planet. I think it's similar to what you said. It's the similar thing about the Turkey, which is, you know, when I write a book, I really don't want to. I do everything in my power not to write a book. You know, I'll give a speech, i'll do a post, anything, not to write it. But the idea it either instead of things pulling that idea out of my head. The problem is everything I see, everything I learned, and everybody meat keeps adding to it. Yep, and it becomes so overwhelming that I decide to write. And I enjoy moments of it, but I don't as a whole project. I don't enjoy writing books. But to your point, the joy it comes afterwards. The joy always feels worth it, well for when I got it out of my body. But two, I get to become a follower of the idea as much as everybody else, because now it's it's not mine anymore. Now it's a thing all on its own. It's interesting. I used to be able to do a seven hour audiobook in eight hours in the studio in one day. Wow, that's the way I recorded my first twelve. But now I do it in the bathroom here, which is all padded and everything, and they let me. But I can only do ten minutes a day. And I finished recording it yesterday and I read the acknowledgments and I burst into tears and couldn't stop crying. And I don't think it was because I found joy that I was done. I think it's because the satisfaction of hearing myself say these words and listening to them. I was glad to hear it. It resonated with me. I felt more human. This all goes back to doing something with love. Yeah, if you can make yourself cry because the project you've given so much of your life too is over, it's because it was a deeply emotional experience and it wasn't transactional. When people come up to me, and I've heard people have said this to me, they go, I wrote a book, I'm like, amazing, What was that Like? That was super easy. I wrote it in like six weeks. And I always think to myself, Oh, that's a shitty book, you know. And the reason is the same as cafeteria food. Like you can take the exact same proportions as a home cooked meal and make cafeteria food. The ingredients are the exact same proportions, but the cafeteria food will taste like shit because it's missing the essential ingredient. It was missing love. And I think the ingredient of love comes with sweat, It comes with energy, It comes with rigor, it comes with sacrifice, It comes with pain, it comes with laughter, it comes from mad fits of inspiration. And at the end of whatever it is, whether it's a book you wrote, a cake you made, or someone you fell in love with, it is overwhelming and hard to put into words. And that's the test. Yeah, when I think about loving friendships, you know, friendships aren't transactional to your point. You know what. Nobody walks around with a notebook in their back pocket and keeps score of what you did for me and what I did for you, and I'm sure they do well. True friendship is not basically friends. Friends don't do that. Sorry, people do that. Fine. Friends don't walk around with a notebook where I keep track of everything and at the end of every month we account for how many favors you owe me vice versa. And true friendship is you could have done fifteen things for me one hundred things for me, and I've done nothing for you. But the reason we're friends and we love each other is because you know, the one time, the one time you want or need me you know I'll be there. Or it could simply be that there is a liminal space between us that is worth the effort and it has nothing to do with incurring an option on future reciprocity. But in fact, it's this liminal space of trust and possibility. Yeah, that fuels for me the most important relationships in my life. The friendship I have with you is about liminal space, which is we don't talk that often. The reality is we don't talk that often, and when we do talk to each other, sometimes it's a little transactional. Hey, quick favor, quick question for you. Sometimes we call each other with a challenge. We try hard to make time for each other when we're in each other's cities, but sometimes we miss each other. But I have unbelievable love for you. It doesn't fit any of the traditional metrics. And all I know is I love you to death and I would do anything for you, any day, anytime, no matter what. I might even make you a Thanksgiving dinner without turkey is your vegetarian. That's the other thing you made me in non vegetarian Thanksgiving as of it, which means you didn't even eat most of it. I mean, who does that who does that? All good? I love you, You're the best, Simon Sinning. If you enjoyed this podcast and would like to hear more, please subscribe wherever you like to listen to podcasts. And if you'd like to learn more about the topic you just heard, please check out the Optimism Library at Simon sinek dot com, where you can get access to more than thirty five undemanded classes about leadership, culture, purpose, and more. Until then, take care of yourself, take care of each other.